Prove Transubtantiation and I will convert

  • Thread starter Thread starter guanophore
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Christ died once on the cross in payment for the sin of the world. In the mass, when he is viewed literally in the wafer and the wine as being literally there…its like he is having to be sacrificed again and again. I will say this repeatedly…I am not a catholic basher…I have MANY dear and precious friends of that religious institution…but please…the mass is not Biblical…neither is transubstantiation. I know that in days past…you were damned basically if you did not believe that…according to the Canon laws, which states…If any one shall deny that the body and blood, together, with the sould and divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ are truly, really and substantially contained in the sacrament of the most holy eucharist, and shall say that He is only in it as a sign, or in a figure, let him be accursed. I will state that I quoted this from a book by Jack Chick. Ok…I know…he is not popular among the Catholic institution…but he truly is trying to state Biblical truth.I know my post probably isnt popular…but please, I do not mean to be ugly or disrespectful…just sharing what I know.
 
I have MANY dear and precious friends of that religious institution…but please…the mass is not Biblical…neither is transubstantiation.
But Jesus said, “My Body is Food indeed, and My Blood is Drink indeed.” and "Whosoever eats my Flesh and drinks my Blood has eternal life. and “He who eats Me, lives because of Me.” and “I am the Bread of Life.” and “THIS IS MY BODY.” Paul said, “Whoever eats and does not decern the Body… is guilty of the Body and Blood of the Lord.” So it is Biblical.
know that in days past…you were damned basically if you did not believe that…according to the Canon laws, which states…If any one shall deny that the body and blood, together, with the sould and divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ are truly, really and substantially contained in the sacrament of the most holy eucharist, and shall say that He is only in it as a sign, or in a figure, let him be accursed.
Well, the “symbolic” heresy/view, didn’t pop up until Zwingli, 1500 years after Christ, so we know that’s not true.
I will state that I quoted this from a book by Jack Chick. Ok…I know…he is not popular among the Catholic [Church]…but he truly is trying to state Biblical truth.I know my post probably isnt popular…but please, I do not mean to be ugly or disrespectful…just sharing what I know.
Ha! Jack Chick? In his anti-Catholic tracts which has a “real” testimony of Alberto Rivera, who was a supposed Jesuit priest, when, in reality, he failed seminary and is now in a mental institute in the Caribbean. Jack Chick’s propaganda is known to be a patchwork of lies, misrepresented history, blasphemy, and anti-Catholic bias. Just sharing what I know.
 
Christ died once on the cross in payment for the sin of the world. In the mass, when he is viewed literally in the wafer and the wine as being literally there…its like he is having to be sacrificed again and again
It’s not a re-sacrifice. It makes presence the Sacrifice of the Cross in an unbloody manner.

Jesus is God the Son and he is Eternal, not limited to our time and space as we know and experience it. Our past, present and future are forever present to God who knows no limitation. He is the Beginning and the End, the Alpha and the Omega. Therefore He is able to make anything possible that is impossible. What we can not see with our eyes we see with the eyes of faith and faith is believing in that which we can not fully understand and God gives us the grace to believe and see (2 Corinthians 5:6). Apart from God we can do nothing but with God all is possible. God created us to know him, to love him, and to serve him in this world and to be happy with him forever in the next. If we deny God he will deny us, but if we turn our lives over to him and confess our sins, he is faithful and will forgive us and he will remember our sins no more (1 John 1:9)

During the celebration of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, Jesus becomes present in a most profound and special way and works through his minister, the priest (in persona Christi- in the person of Christ, 2 Corinthians 2:10; Revelation 1:5-6). So in reality it is Jesus himself as Priest and Victim offering the Mass through his priest and with all of us in unity with the Holy Spirit to God the Father. Our gifts along with bread and wine are brought up to the altar. The bread is not mere bread but it is all our prayers and intentions of the past week and present moment that we bring to God. We see our gifts of bread and wine (prayers and intentions) brought forth and given to the priest. By the power of the Holy Spirit during the words of consecration, “This Is My BODY, This Is My Blood”, the bread and wine will be changed into the Body and Blood of Christ. Now present before us is the cross of Calvary and the once and for all sacrifice of our Risen Lord Jesus.
 
I will say this repeatedly…I am not a catholic basher…I have MANY dear and precious friends of that religious institution…but please…the mass is not Biblical…neither is transubstantiation.
The Mass is Biblical. The Mass brings into mind, “Do this in remembrance of me.” For as St. Paul said, “For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes in glory.” (1 Corinthians 11:26)

Transubstantiation merely states that during the consecration of Bread and wine. The subtance of bread and wine are no longer present. The substance has been replace by the substance of Jesus Christ himself. His body, blood, soul and divinity is truly present. We received Jesus Christ at Mass. St. Paul again said, “Whoever, therefore, eats the bread and drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord.” 1 Corinthians 11:27). If this were just mere symbolic, then the verse itself would not make any sense.
I know that in days past…you were damned basically if you did not believe that…according to the Canon laws, which states…If any one shall deny that the body and blood, together, with the sould and divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ are truly, really and substantially contained in the sacrament of the most holy eucharist, and shall say that He is only in it as a sign, or in a figure, let him be accursed. I will state that I quoted this from a book by Jack Chick. Ok…I know…he is not popular among the Catholic institution…but he truly is trying to state Biblical truth.I know my post probably isnt popular…but please, I do not mean to be ugly or disrespectful…just sharing what I know.
Jack Chick is Anti-Catholic. I would be careful if you read his material. Most Protestants in here (who have been longer here than you have) hate the man for distorting Catholic belief. Jack Chick is one Protestants who put his Anti-Catholic practices into practice.

His tracts are rather disrespectful and annoying. We believe in the Real Presence because in John 6:53-58:

“Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. As the Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats me will live because of me. This is the bread which came down from heaven, not such as the fathers ate and died, he who eats this bread will live forever.”

Here some commentary from John Salza:
John 6:55 - to clarify further, Jesus says** “For My Flesh is food indeed, and My Blood is drink indeed.”** This phrase can only be understood as being responsive to those who do not believe that Jesus’ flesh is food indeed, and His blood is drink indeed. Further, Jesus uses the word which is translated as “sarx.” “Sarx”** means flesh (not “soma” which means body**). See, for example, John 1:13,14; 3:6; 8:15; 17:2; Matt. 16:17; 19:5; 24:22; 26:41; Mark 10:8; 13:20; 14:38; and Luke 3:6; 24:39 which provides other examples in Scripture where “sarx” means flesh. It is always literal.
John 6:55 - further, the phrases “real” food and “real” drink use the word “alethes.” “Alethes” means “really” or “truly,” and would only be used if there were doubts concerning the reality of Jesus’ flesh and blood as being food and drink. Thus,** Jesus is emphasizing the miracle of His body and blood being actual food and drink**.
Unbiblical Nope. Not at all. Our belief is very Biblical.
 
To Tommi first. Your statement about us living in a rational society appears to be false. It was my “rational” mind that was influenced by my irrational feelings that moved me to be agnostic for 40 years. There is nothing rational about the world we currently live in, EXCEPT. LOVE which is seen as irrational. It is through love that rational living begins and opened me to something I believed wasn’t real. It is through loss of love that we act irrationally. To be created to experience love from a universe that doesn’t appear loving or at least indifferent is just like not understanding how God can exist in a piece of bread. When I had no belief in God which was the history of my family then God was not real. I thought that I was rational in my thinking. Gravity cannot be seen but can be experienced. When I began to know that love could only create a loving creature that was a start. When that love began to affect me like gravity it became personal and told me one night in a voice not male nor female “I love you.” That love became God. Then if God can create all of this God can do anything. We are told that God is through all and in all. It would be nothing to be in a piece of bread but it took several miracles to bring me to the beginning of rationality based on love to believe that simple miracle of the Eucharist.
 
To Bible Believer, St. Paul stated that he was told things that could not be put into words. The Eucharist is a gift of grace. If we Catholics fully believed it there would be an obvious sign to the world that would change everything. The doubts about Christ being in the Eucharist is the fault of us Catholics. We do not live like we have Christ in the Eucharist. I am profoundly sorry about my part in that grave sin. But everytime I go to Confession and confess the times I sin it is a reminder that it is those times that I do not believe and Christ opens me a little more to the reality of his words. And I hope to have the faith of a mustard seed some day.
 
Matthew 26: 26-28. During the meal Jesus took bread, blessed it,broke it, and gave it to his disciples. “Take this and eat it,” He said, " this is my body." Then He took a cup, gave thanks, and gave it to them. " All of you must drink from it," He said, " for this is my blood, the blood of the covenant, to be poured out in behalf of many for the forgiveness of sins."

Mark 14: 22-24. During the meal He took bread, blessed and broke it, and gave it to them. " Take this," He said, “this is my body.” He likewise took a cup, gave thanks and passed it to them, and they all drank from it. " He said to them: “This is my blood, the blood of the covenant, to be poured out on behalf of many.”

Luke 22: 19-20. Then, taking bread and giving thanks, He broke it and gave it to them, saying : " This is my body to be given for you. Do this in rememberance of me." He did the same with the cup after eating, saying as He did so: " This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which will be shed for you. "

This is my body, This is my blood, not this is a symbol of my body and blood, or pretend that this is my body and blood, but This is my body, and This is my blood.

HMMM
 
The Eucharist is a gift of grace.
Hi

In my opinion it is not a gift of grace, it is only a mark of superstition and superstition does not reflect one’s steadfastness on relgion but a weakness of that.

I respect your religion.

Thanks
 
Ronald.

I, unsurprisingly, have to disagree!

Gravity cant be seen, but it can be measured, explained, and recreated. Gravity isnt supernatural, its not magic.
Now love is emotion. Can emotion be explained or measured? In it’s raw state, yes it can. Can it be explained? Yes, it is a Human response to socialisation, need for company, our herding and co-operation. It’s obviously much more than that yet Love is rational and explainable.

The default position remains rationality. If the inverse was true, we would be living in some kind of crazy LSD trip where the floor was made of spongecake and the colour Blue had a taste, nothing would be real.

I am very happy and willing to understand thet the Wafer and Wine are the Blood and Body of Christ in beleivers hearts. But there is Zero arguement, none whatsoever, that the food changes into white blood cells and muscle tissue of a 1,975 year old prophet.

If you dont beleive me, check out the contents of your mouth sometime. It’s mushy wafer and wine.
 
Tommi, I once believed as you. Nobody could talk me into believing what I do now. It is impossible to put into words what has been shown to me. Words cannot describe infinity and the infinite possibilities that do exist. What you call a rational explanation are beliefs formed from your experience and your internal sense of your existence in self awareness that really has no rational explanation since you seemingly suddenly appear and perceive out of nowhere. We explain what we see and take measurements or make calculations to support our point of view in order to not go crazy. We try to rationally explain our existence and call that reality. We then call ourselves intelligent because we make sense to ourselves. I was there and I did not choose to be where I am now. I could not deny what was shown to me. I will never convince you otherwise. Love that came from nowhere brought me here. A bright luminescent light to me that I was loved at age 57. My shame was gone and I love and think and speak like never before. I pray for people who blow up innocent people so that their hearts will soften. I pray that we are released from the smallest amount of hostility because I know that it contributes to hostility that harms and kills innocents. I never did that before.

Dear Paar, If my reality in the Eucharist is a superstition and it is weak then my faith is meaningless. However, no man forced me to believe this. I would not believe this from a man. Just as I do not expect you to believe me. However, if you say you are a bridge and you call my belief superstition because you do not know what I know you are sounding a bit hostile in your judgement. My belief of Christ in the Eucharist only deepens my love for God and all I desire is for everyone to have this connection of love. I never had this love before 57. I am now freer at age 60 and would never return to my state of mind in which I hated the Catholic faith. It was irrational.
 
My belief of Christ in the Eucharist only deepens my love for God and all I desire is for everyone to have this connection of love. I never had this love before 57. I am now freer at age 60 and would never return to my state of mind in which I hated the Catholic faith. It was irrational.
Hi

I don’t want the you should lose hope or get disappointed, yet I would say it is only a superstition, an exaggeration of the actual in my opinion.

What you hated at the age of 57, now you love most , it might be a sense of remorse. Please base your faith on facts rather than sentiments or being emotional.

Thanks
 
Ronald.
I’m happy that you have found such peace and love in your faith, and indeed your right. Untill the heart is opened to beleif then a person cannot be persuaded.
It’s like looking at a table and someone trying to convince you its a chair. It is not my intention to try and convert you or anyone from your faith, because thats not going to happen.Nor would i want it to.

Im just facinated why, intelligent thinking educated people, often with degrees and doctorates can accept something like Transubstantiation that , in the face of cold hard reality, breaks down immediatly it is challenged.

I have no doubt that in 300 AD it was easy to swallow, if you’ll pardon the pun, but in those days the world was flat and witches were burned and Noah was thought to have really physically built a big boat.
I’m happy to accept the scribes who wrote the bible conjouring up such stories as warnings not to anger God. What religion ever succeded without a stick to go with the carrot? But in these days do we need to adhere to the letter of the bible instead of the spirit?
I have no doubt that Jesus may have said “This bread is me body”, but is there not just a slight chance he was really saying " Look, im dead soon, and i dont want to be forgotton, so evrytime you eat, think of me and spread the messages i’ve given…but hey, just to make things totally clear, 2000 years from now , dont be thinking something crazy like theres bits of my actual body mixed in with the bread or something similar
 
The default positon for reality is non-supernature.

The Bread is made out of flour and water, it remains exactly that, and goes through a normal digestion process. This is perfectly provable.

To suggest anything else based on ontinology, you might as well argue that a traffic cone is actually lemon cheese pie. You might be able to point to a obscure book written in a time of ignorance, that says traffic cones are Lemon Cheese pies, you may debate for centuries that Traffic cones are metaphorically lemon pies, But that dosnt make, at the end of the day them any more pie-like.

The original poster wanted proof that transsub existed, and i’m afraid, it’s impossible to prove…and rather easy to prove the opposite.
And, for an agnostic to argue any matter of faith, while completely lacking in same, is illogical. You make yourself superior in intellect to every scholar and theologian in almost 2,000 years of Christian history, as well as to ancient Jewish and pre-Judaic scholars back to creation. That’s some chutzpah!

Why do “agnostics” come here, anyway? To learn, or to condemn?
 
Hi

In my opinion it is not a gift of grace, it is only a mark of superstition and superstition does not reflect one’s steadfastness on relgion but a weakness of that.

I respect your religion.

Thanks
So it would appear to one who is a non-believer. However, Christ Himself instituted the Eucharist and it has been celebrated consistently since. Superstition has no place in Christianity, never has and never will. Supernatural, now there’s something else.

Peace be to you.
 
And, for an agnostic to argue any matter of faith, while completely lacking in same, is illogical. You make yourself superior in intellect to every scholar and theologian in almost 2,000 years of Christian history, as well as to ancient Jewish and pre-Judaic scholars back to creation. That’s some chutzpah!

Why do “agnostics” come here, anyway? To learn, or to condemn?
Hold up, I’m not saying i’m superior to the theologians.
I may well be wrong. I often am. But specifically in this case, the OP was challenging the catholics here to prove Transub, and theres pages and pages of people replying with Scriptural “Evidence” and with theories such as " It is both bread and body simultaniously".
But evryone of them seems to be incapable of saying " Yeah, OK it’s actually bread…" and evryone of them is saying, “This bread is transformed in ways we do not comprehend, by the power of god, into the body and blood of christ”

But it’s still just bread.

Why do agnostics come here. Well not to be converted for sure, but yes indeed, to learn as i have said. I’m facinated as to how someone can answer these questions apart from the *“Leap of Faith” *of “It’s just True”
 
Hold up, I’m not saying i’m superior to the theologians. "
Tom,
A few posts back you made a statement that is false. You said love is an emotion.

You can feel love emotionally, but it is not a feeling or emotion. You can feel heat but heat is not a feeling. Heat is a physical phenomenon. Love is a spiritual phenomenon. You can measure heat and observe and measure its effects with instruments. There are no instruments that can measure, weigh or hold love. I can move heat or temperature, the physical phenomenon, from one container into another and store it in a heat sink. I can take heat out of my house and push it outdoors with an air conditioner, a machine. No machine can do this with love.

We take in information or data from the physical universe with our five physical senses and instruments that are extensions of our physical senses, to examine it, and using our minds try to explain and understand the things that exist in the physical universe. The natural sciences do this.

If a thing is real and it is not of or in the physical universe then it is a spiritual thing. If something is real and it can not be measured, weighed, touched, held, moved from one place to another, it is not physical. If it is not physical, but still real, it is spiritual.

Love is a spiritual reality.

Which of your five senses do you use to feel love? Which of them measure it or touch or hold it, see it, taste it, smell it, hear it? I can see someone I love with my eyes. But my eyes can not see the love. You made the mistake of thinking it is an emotion, because it can be felt. Where is it? Is it in me? Is it in my wife? Is it between us? Explain it to me. With what faculty do you feel or know love? Where is it in you if you have some? Is it in your mind, your liver, your bones?

It is in your soul, which you are unaware of having. In Latin the word for heart is cor. Love is in the core of your being, if you have it. Love can be in us, but it can also not be in us. Some have it and some lack it. We can know it, or if it is not in us, we do not know it. If I never knew it I could easily say I do not believe it exists. Those who do know or have love also know that it comes in degrees. It is something that is good to have, but more is always better. It is something that we can be richer or poorer in. Those who lack it are starved. Since it can not be measured we never know if we have a lot of it or a little. We can think a little, or a little taste of it is enough, because no matter how much we have it comforts us. Some people experience so much of it that they call it spiritual ecstasy.

So there is something many of these posters is telling you they have experienced and it is in them. They would like you to also know this thing, because they think it is good and want to share something with others they think is good that they have found. To them it makes life worth living, gives life meaning and without it they suffer. They also use the term love to describe this thing. You are saying you don’t believe it, because you have not experienced it yourself and you do not know it.

One of the things we humans do is share our experiences. We use words to try to explain what we encounter in our individual lives. I experienced such and such. You should try it. There is a great place to watch the sunset. Check it out. We try to help one another in this way. We share knowledge. If someone has a sick child we try to help them find a doctor, or medicine, or a cure. We tell them what we know, but we can not make them take the medicine.

Doing evil is a spiritual sickness. Everyone is sick with this illness, but some deny they are sick. There is a cure for it and it can not be had until one admits sickness. Some people say they have found the cure. Others simply don’t get it and think these religious people are crazy. They wonder how anyone could believe medieval nonsense when they see no evidence for it.

Some people feel very burdened by their consciences over the evil they have done and do. They want to change. Others who do the same things don’t seem bothered. They are willing to remain as they are. It is this desire to be purged of evil and seeking a way to be free of it that leads people to Jesus. You apparently lack this. You see no need.

Jesus said to the pharisees that He came for sinners, but they said they had no sin so they had no need of Him. Those who find Him say everyone needs what He gives them.

Logic says either they are right or wrong. If they are wrong they are living a fantasy. If they are right where does that leave you?
 
But specifically in this case, the OP was challenging the catholics here to prove Transub, and theres pages and pages of people replying with Scriptural “Evidence” and with theories such as " It is both bread and body simultaniously".
You believe in evil, right? It can’t be measured in the horror of famine-starved corpses, the body counts of wars and insurrections. You see evil played out on TV. It cannot be completely defined, contained or physically measured, since it is a pure force of human will.

Quite the same with God, Who alone is good. Since the human intellect is so limited, so finite, so feeble in confronting evil, one is left to wonder what power, what force is able to destroy, if not even dominate, evil. That force is the creative God, witnessed to by those of faith over the millennia.

We have varying degrees of faith, which disposes us to believe in the unseen. Even believing in that which is seen requires faith that it is truly what it is believed to be. How can you be certain? We are certain through God’s gift of faith. We simply see things differently. To us, an agnostic or atheistic train of thought seems shallow, incomplete, cognitively lacking.

You are aware of the unseen forces which control so much - you mention gravity. You see evidence of gravity and believe in it. We see evidence of God, and believe in Him. There is little functional difference between us, when viewed in this manner. It should not be such a stretch, huh?
 
I have no doubt that Jesus may have said “This bread is me body”, but is there not just a slight chance he was really saying " Look, im dead soon, and i dont want to be forgotton, so evrytime you eat, think of me and spread the messages i’ve given…but hey, just to make things totally clear, 2000 years from now , dont be thinking something crazy like theres bits of my actual body mixed in with the bread or something similar
OK, so why would Christ allow so many to leave Him over His teaching in John 6? That is contrary to His nature, unless He actually meant what He said.
 
I have no doubt that Jesus may have said “This bread is me body”, but is there not just a slight chance he was really saying " Look, im dead soon, and i dont want to be forgotton, so evrytime you eat, think of me and spread the messages i’ve given…but hey, just to make things totally clear, 2000 years from now , dont be thinking something crazy like theres bits of my actual body mixed in with the bread or something similar
OK, so why would Christ allow so many to leave Him over His teaching in John 6? That is contrary to His nature, unless He actually meant what He said.
 
I’m facinated as to how someone can answer these questions apart from the *“Leap of Faith” *of “It’s just True”
It is revealed truth, from the beginning until now. It is not revealed through means that man can grasp in the physical realm. It is spiritual, since man has both body and spirit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top