purgatory

  • Thread starter Thread starter durhamfire
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Romans 7:15-25
I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do. 16And if I do what I do not want to do, I agree that the law is good. 17As it is, it is no longer I myself who do it, but it is sin living in me. 18I know that nothing good lives in me, that is, in my sinful nature. For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. 19For what I do is not the good I want to do; no, the evil I do not want to do—this I keep on doing. 20Now if I do what I do not want to do, it is no longer I who do it, but it is sin living in me that does it.
21So I find this law at work: When I want to do good, evil is right there with me. 22For in my inner being I delight in God’s law; 23but I see another law at work in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin at work within my members. 24What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death? 25Thanks be to God—through Jesus Christ our Lord!

Why does Paul struggle with sin?

Why does he say that he continues to do the very things he hates?

If Paul sins, is he innocent of that sin because it’s not really him doing the sinning?

Now, if Paul can claim to be a prisoner of the law of sin at work within his flesh, how much more do those of us who are less holy need to be freed from the attractions of the flesh, the devil and the world?
Moondweller?

Yankee_drifter?

Thoughts?
 
Moondweller?

Yankee_drifter?

Thoughts?
This is our frustration, Randy, Many Prostestant simply pass over these hard passages of Paul’s teaching, can’t l look at them and ponder for very long. Gotta find the easier meaning. They some convince themselves they have :eek: and come to Catholic Answers to witness the false doctrine.Well, got news for them. Catholics here CA are too well grounded in the truth of our Lord Jesus and what he commissioned his Apostles to hand on down to us until the last day.👍:)Carlan
 
[/INDENT]And since the tense of verb should be more accurately translated “are being sanctified”, one wonders why you fail to appreciate that sanctification is a process and not a one-time event.

You’ve been shown this many times. Why do you ignore it? 🤷
I didn’t ignore it, Randy. I answered this error TWICE, once way back on page 48 and then again on page 49. Literally,“For by one offering HE HAS perfected in perpetuity the sanctified” (Heb. 10:14). This verse states emphatically that it’s God Himself who has perfected, in perpetuity (for life) true believers who are presently and continuously sanctified, and that by the one time, past, completed event of the ONE (once for all) sacrifice of Jesus Christ.

What your mind seems to blank out on, Randy, are the phrases “He has perfected,” and, “by one offering.”

What the verse does NOT say is that by the personal efforts of the believer to achieve sinlessness or sacramental forgiveness in this life is he “being” perfected and sanctified. But rather, “BY one offering HE has perfected in perpetuity the sanctified” (i.e., the sanctified in the risen Christ, see Acts 26:18; 1 Cor. 1:2; 6:11; Heb. 2:11).

That’s the power God has through the cross. What you don’t understand (like the Jewish, religious leaders in Christ’s day) is the Scriptures and the power of God,

The ONLY way any true believer, now sanctified in the risen Christ, would ever go to your purgatory is if the risen Christ Himself is presently in purgatory. Is He Randy? There’s not even any Divine revelation of its existence.
 
Question for MD, and Yankee, re. Purgatory;

Obviously there is a reason for purgatory, why it needs to be so.
If there was a “need” for purgatory, Thing, then it would have been reveled in Scripture. It’s an extrabiblical, RC tradition borne out of unbelief in what God has the power to do “by one offering.”
So my question to you both is why, if you are both born again christians, why do you sin?
We sin because we’re still in these yet unredeemed bodies. But even these sins were dealt with, once for all, judicially, “by one offering.”
 
moondweller;5977593
If there was a “need” for purgatory, Thing, then it would have been reveled in Scripture. It’s an extrabiblical, RC tradition borne out of unbelief in what God has the power to do by one offering

I beg your pardon.

I would like to present the following to you. I do hope you will take the time to ponder it.
And please excuse me if this was presented to you earlier, however, if it was, it certainly won’t hurt to take it in again.
Code:
                                               IS PURGATORY  SCRIPTURAL?
                                ******************************
First we should note that the word ‘purgatory” is not found in Sacred Scripture, this not the point. The words, “Trinity” and “Incarnation” are
not found in Scripture, yet these doctrines are clearly taught there.
Likewise, the Bible teaches that an intermediate state of purification exists, we call it Purgatory. What is important is the name.
Code:
       Where does the Bible refer to the doctrine of Purgatory
Mt12:13:

And whoever says a word against the Son of
man will be forgiven: but whoever speaks
against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven,
either in this age or in the age to come…
Jesus implies that some sins can be forgiven in the next world.
Sin cannot be forgiven in Hell. There is no sin to be forgiven in
heaven. Any remission of sin in the next world can only occur in
Purgatory.

1Cor3:15
If any man’s work is burned up, he will
suffer loss, though he himself will be saved,
but only through fire.

1Pet3:18-20
For Christ also died for sins once for all,
the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might
bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh
but made alive in the spirit; in which he went and
preached to the spirits in prison, who formally did
not obey, when God’s patience waited in the days of
Noah, during the building of the ark, in which a few,
that is, eight persons, were saved through water.

1Peter4- 6
For this is why the Gospel was preached even
to the dead, that though judged in the flesh
like men, theY might live in the spirit like God.

Note that it is a prison for disobedient spirits, and yet they were
saved when Jesus preached to them. This is not hell, because no
one is saved from hell. This is probably not the ‘limbo of the fathers, “
(often called “Abraham’s bosom”, where the righteous souls of the
OT waited until Christ opened the gates of heaven), because this is a
place for disobedient spirits. One cannot imagine that St. Peter is describing the waiting place of such righteous OT saints as David and
John the Baptist when he mentions disobedient spirits.

St. Peter is describing a temporary state for disobedient souls who
were eventually saved. At the very least, it proves that a third place can
exist between heaven and hell. At the very most, it proves the Catholic
doctrine of Purgatory.
Code:
The clearest affirmation of the existence of Purgatory comes from the
Greek Septuagint; the Old Testament Scriptures used by Christ, all the
NT writers, and the councils of Hippo and Carthage( which authoritatively determined the”cannon” of inspired books of the Bible.)

2Maccabees 12:44-45
For he were not expecting that those who had fallen would rise again,
It would have been superfluous and foolish to pray for the dead. But if he is looking to the splendid reward that is laid up for those who fall
asleep in godliness, it was a holy and pious thought.
therefore he made atonement for the dead, that they might be delivered
from their sin.
Code:
 It is impossible to aid souls in heaven ( they have no need )
And equally impossible to aid the souls in hell(they have no hope)
Praying for the dead presumes souls in a middle state where atonement for sin can be made.

This passage from Maccabees is a proof text.
It explicitly affirms an intermediate state where the faithful departed
make atonement for their sin.

2 Maccabees was so contrary to the “justification by faith alone” theology of the reformers that Martin Luther chose to remove it( along with six other books) from the Old Testament.

This takes us back to the question of the canon of the Bible, and that’s a
topic for an other thread. Carlan

San Juan Catholic Seminars.
Farmington, NM>‘
 
If there was a “need” for purgatory, Thing, then it would have been reveled in Scripture. It’s an extrabiblical, RC tradition borne out of unbelief in what God has the power to do "by one offering.
What the Holy Spirit teaches the Apostles and the Church Christ founded after Jesus Christ died is not written in the Sacred Scriptures.
"We sin because we’re still in these yet unredeemed bodies. But even these sins were dealt with, once for all, judicially, “by one offering.”
I remember reading somewhere that if you do not forgive your brother you will not be forgiven.
 
Nope, that’s not at all what I mean. You would have to understand the depth of His grace toward us to grasp what I was saying. You rob from His glory when you take what is His and in some way apply it to yourself. I know you can’t understand this, Steve.
I see. We “rob” God. We take His very nature away from Him, leaving Him with less than He once had. Interesting. We’ve stolen this “glory” and “applied it to ourselves”. So, not only are we capable of leaving God with less of something He once fully had, but we can also manipulate this stolen “thing” and wield it’s power on ourselves…I guess becoming gods ourselves, eh? I’m sure I’ve gotten it wrong, moon…seeing as how I can’t fathom “the depth of His grace”. As a dumb, shallow Catholic, though, I’m very interested in learning about this “glory theivery” we’re guilty of. Dumb it down for me, moon. Help me understand how “robbing Him of His glory” has any kind of intelligence behind it whatsoever. What precisely is IT that is His, that we take away from Him? What is “glory”, if it’s not His very nature that no one can take away from. What is “rob Him of glory” if it’s not your version of claiming we divert attention away from glorifying (worshipping and praising) Him?
 
10By the grace God has given me, I laid a foundation as an expert builder, and someone else is building on it. But each one should be careful how he builds. 11For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ. 12If any man builds on this foundation using gold, silver, costly stones, wood, hay or straw, 13his work will be shown for what it is, because the Day will bring it to light. It will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test the quality of each man’s work. 14If what he has built survives, he will receive his reward. 15If it is burned up, he will suffer loss; he himself will be saved, but only as one escaping through the flames.

(1 Corinthians 3)

Nathan:

Some Protestants teach that verse 15 describes one who does few good works but still makes it to heaven. For such a one, there is little reward in heaven. For others, whose good works are like gold or silver or diamonds, they will be rewarded according to what they have done. Just as there are degrees of punishment in hell, so too there are degrees of reward in heaven, these Protestants say.
How do the relevant denominatiins reconcile this interpretation with the belief that free will is excluded from initiating the works prepared by god for us.
I’m no expert in protestatnt theology, the question just jumped out of the page and am interested.
I mean does that then mean god also elected level of reward in heaven for each by the works prepared.
I believe works are prepared for us and we strive to actually do them through our faith.
 
If there was a “need” for purgatory, Thing, then it would have been reveled in Scripture. It’s an extrabiblical, RC tradition borne out of unbelief in what God has the power to do "by one offering."We sin because we’re still in these yet unredeemed bodies. But even these sins were dealt with, once for all, judicially, “by one offering.”
Do u believe that the offering once for all and our declared belief in Jesus negate need
for sins to be forgiven?

After belief do we still need to be reconcilled after sin?

I am not baiting here, I am Interested.

Is antonement an action that is needed to open door to Seperate action of having sins forgiven?
 
I didn’t ignore it, Randy. I answered this error TWICE, once way back on page 48 and then again on page 49. Literally,
For by one offering HE HAS perfected in perpetuity the sanctified” (Heb. 10:14).
This verse states emphatically that it’s God Himself who has perfected, in perpetuity (for life) true believers who are presently and continuously sanctified, and that by the one time, past, completed event of the ONE (once for all) sacrifice of Jesus Christ.

What your mind seems to blank out on, Randy, are the phrases “He has perfected,” and, “by one offering.”

What the verse does NOT say is that by the personal efforts of the believer to achieve sinlessness or sacramental forgiveness in this life is he “being” perfected and sanctified. But rather, “BY one offering HE has perfected in perpetuity the sanctified” (i.e., the sanctified in the risen Christ, see Acts 26:18; 1 Cor. 1:2; 6:11; Heb. 2:11).

That’s the power God has through the cross. What you don’t understand (like the Jewish, religious leaders in Christ’s day) is the Scriptures and the power of God,

The ONLY way any true believer, now sanctified in the risen Christ, would ever go to your purgatory is if the risen Christ Himself is presently in purgatory. Is He Randy? There’s not even any Divine revelation of its existence.
Why would Jesus have to be in Purgatory in order to purify those who need final cleansing of the vestiges of sin?
 
Jesus Christ, before His ascension to heaven, gave us, not a man to lead, guide and teach us Truth, but gave us the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit indwells the Christian who is born again and washed in the blood of Christ. This is why Scriptures can be understood by the Christian. He is relying on the guidance of the Holy Spirit.
Really yankee? And what is the doctrine of salvation of these Christians you refer to? I hope that you would concede that if these “Christians” are led by the guidance of the Holy Spirit to understand Scripture and discern the truths of salvation based on that divine guidance, that there must be some evidence of what this revelation of salvation truly is, as well as some evidence of unanimity of this belief among these “Christians”. Or are you the only “Christian” you know? Are people who don’t share your precise view of how they are saved really Christian, yankee? If not, can they not say the same exact thing about you, in your disagreement with them? I wonder if you’ve ever considered just how many of your non-Catholic “brethren” actually agree with your essentials of the faith, or if it bothers you at all that some very very saintly men and women (many of them martyrs) throughout history would FULLY disagree with your theology, and would offer that your beliefs potentially put your soul in danger. Probably doesn’t phase you in the slightest, and that’s typical of post-reformation Christians. Just close your eyes to the rest of the non-Catholic Christian world that disagrees with you on essentials, and focus all your proselytization on us lost Catholics, right?
What Christ accomplished at Calvary, leaves no place or need for purgatory, indulgences, temporal punishment. These things go against the perfect, complete blood sacrifice of Christ on behalf of the sinner. There is nothing left for sinners to do, but to accept this free gift of salvation, believe on the One who offers this gift, and follow Him.
Hmm…nothing left to do…EXCEPT all those things you mentioned, eh? Pretty vague, yankee…what does “follow Him” mean? And do you concede, as you have suggested in the way you have phrased it here, that following Him is required for our salvation? Or is following Him an automatic response to our “true” belief? If so, why phrase it as you do, that it is something sinners have “left to DO”? I would imagine you’d probably like to rephrase it, huh?
Christ did not make a partial payment, then demanded we pay the rest. That’s the opposite of what REDEEM means.
Good thing purgatory is NOT a payment for our redemption, yankee. Honestly, do you and moon even absorb anything at all? Purgatory is FOR THE REDEEMED! Not TO redeem 🤷
If you need unwritten traditions, or apocryphal books, to try and prove purgatory, then you are going outside of God’s Holy, inspired, inerrant Word. You are denying the all sufficiency of Christ’s atonement. You are adding to Scripture which we have no right to do. We must never usurp Christ’s authority by placing men in very lofty positions as if they were Christ on earth, and placing traditions on par with the God breathed, Holy Spirit authored, Holy Scriptures. Nor does Christ reside in a church. He does not dwell in temples made by hands.
Nice try, Mr. Chick. You call us when the shuttle lands.
 
Why would Jesus have to be in Purgatory in order to purify those who need final cleansing of the vestiges of sin?
He wouldn’t. Nor would any true believer need to be there either, since they were cleansed of their sins by His blood and are presently sanctified (set apart) in the RISEN Christ.
 
40.png
Thing:
What the Holy Spirit teaches the Apostles and the Church Christ founded after Jesus Christ died is not written in the Sacred Scriptures.
Were the Epistles written before Christ died?
I remember reading somewhere that if you do not forgive your brother you will not be forgiven.
Ah-huh. Is your purgatory a place (time?) where (when?) sins are forgiven? Check the CCC.
 
40.png
SteveGC:
I see. We “rob” God. We take His very nature away from Him, leaving Him with less than He once had. Interesting. We’ve stolen this “glory” and “applied it to ourselves”. So, not only are we capable of leaving God with less of something He once fully had, but we can also manipulate this stolen “thing” and wield it’s power on ourselves…I guess becoming gods ourselves, eh? I’m sure I’ve gotten it wrong, moon…seeing as how I can’t fathom “the depth of His grace”. As a dumb, shallow Catholic, though, I’m very interested in learning about this “glory theivery” we’re guilty of.
No you’re not. Nor should you end your sentences with a preposition. Tell me Steve, what does this verse mean?Mal 3:8 “Will a man rob God? Yet you are robbing Me! But you say, ‘How have we robbed You?’ In tithes and offerings.”
 
40.png
panevino:
Do u believe that the offering once for all and our declared belief in Jesus negate need for sins to be forgiven?
Certainly.Acts 10:43 “Of Him all the prophets bear witness that through His name everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins.”

Acts 13:38 “Therefore let it be known to you, brethren, that through Him forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you,”

Col 1:14 “…in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins”.But according to your teaching purgatory isn’t about forgiveness of sins.
After belief do we still need to be reconcilled after sin?
Reconciliation to God is not forgiveness of sins. Reconciliation to God is changing one’s relationship with God; that of a once enemy to a friend.Rom 5:10-11 “For if while we were enemies we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son, much more, having been reconciled, we shall be saved by His life." And not only this, but we also exult in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received the reconciliation.”

2 Cor 5:18 “Now all {these} things are from God, who reconciled us to Himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation,”

Col 1:22 “*…yet He has now reconciled you in His fleshly body through death, in order to present you before Him holy and blameless and beyond reproach…”*Christ’s work of reconciliation on the cross is applied to the believer, in full, at the time of belief in Him, and the true believer is now perfectly and completely reconciled to God.
Is antonement an action that is needed to open door to Seperate action of having sins forgiven?
I don’t understand this question. But it is interesting that the word “atonement” is not used in the N.T. In the O.T. the Hebrew word for atonement is “kaphar,” and means “to cover.” The animal sacrifices prescribed in the Mosaic Law could only “cover” sins. But the one, final sacrifice of the incarnate Son actually took away sins, once for all (1 Jn. 1:29; 1 Pet. 2:24; 2 Cor. 5:21).Heb 9:26 “Otherwise, He would have needed to suffer often since the foundation of the world; but now once at the consummation of the ages He has been manifested to put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself.”

But your purgatory isn’t about forgiving sins. However, the above verses tell you why there’s no such thing as your purgatory found in the Scriptures.
 
He wouldn’t. Nor would any true believer need to be there either, since they were cleansed of their sins by His blood and are presently sanctified (set apart) in the RISEN Christ.
You wrote:
The ONLY way any true believer, now sanctified in the risen Christ, would ever go to your purgatory is if the risen Christ Himself is presently in purgatory.
Why would it be necessary for Jesus to be in Purgatory for anyone else to go there?
 
Why would it be necessary for Jesus to be in Purgatory for anyone else to go there?
You’ve got your answer, Randy. But it’s an answer that requires thought. Not for someone else to do the thinking for you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top