E
Eden
Guest
Magically or miraculously? God does is not “magic”.Of course I do. I just don’t believe that there is any scriptural evidence that God communicates to us by causing sores to magically appear on someone’s hand.
Magically or miraculously? God does is not “magic”.Of course I do. I just don’t believe that there is any scriptural evidence that God communicates to us by causing sores to magically appear on someone’s hand.
As it is a Roman Caholic legend and not reality, I have to believe that would be magic.Magically or miraculously? God does is not “magic”.
You have not given any evidence to dispute that the occurrence of the stigmata is a miracle. Do you have a better response?As it is a Roman Caholic legend and not reality, I have to believe that would be magic.
It’s absence from scripture and the fact that there is no evidence in scripture to suggest that God speaks to us in this way is all the evidence I need.You have not given any evidence to dispute that the occurrence of the stigmata is a miracle. Do you have a better response?
I realize that Baptists do not believe in miracles. I assume you realize that Catholics are not required to believe in the stigmata but it is also not contradictory to the faith to do so.It’s absence from scripture and the fact that there is no evidence in scripture to suggest that God speaks to us in this way is all the evidence I need.
Then you have no business telling me that I don’t understand Roman Catholic teaching.I realize that Baptists do not believe in miracles.
When I was in a discussion with Baptists several months ago, I was told that surviving a car accident for a believer is an example of a miracle. I believe that it can be. But the law of averages could also be a factor. If you have enough accidents, or rolls of the dice, someone will walk out sometimes. This can be seen as a miracle by a believer but for an atheist, it can easily be explained by the law of averages. Why are things like a stigmata or incorruptibles that do not have a tidy explanation less easy for you to accept?Then you have no business telling me that I don’t understand Roman Catholic teaching.
Baptists believe very much in miracles. We simply believe that miracles must be judged in light of scripture.
I have answered this question several times for you now. If you wouldn’t listen to my answer those times, I don’t see any reason to keep repeating myself.Why are things like a stigmata or incorruptibles that do not have a tidy explanation less easy for you to accept?
You stated that the stigmata does not appear in the Bible but you also cannot give alternative explanations for the occurrence of stigmatas other than magic.I have answered this question several times for you now. If you wouldn’t listen to my answer those times, I don’t see any reason to keep repeating myself.
Why are things like a stigmata or incorruptibles that do not have a tidy explanation less easy for you to accept?
I think I understand your belief that “miracles must be judged in light of scripture.”I have answered this question several times for you now. If you wouldn’t listen to my answer those times, I don’t see any reason to keep repeating myself.
FYI for 12volt and others. Padre Pio was a man who lived in the 20th century. The “legends” were about him when he was alive and many of them are well documented.No, I don’t believe that they were liars, but I do believe that it’s very common in Roman Catholicism for legends and personality cults to grow up around revered dead people.
These are simply not part of our culture. What we would do is examine if they are speaking with the dead or simply visions. If they are simply visions, we would examine their messages and methods with our understanding of scripture to see if these agree or disagree with our understandings of doctrines. If they are contray, we would dismiss them as appearances by the “angel of light”, satan. If they agree, we would ask why are these visions even neccesary whein that truth is in scripture. Either way they would be dismissed as demonic or as simply made up by the faithful, a pious fraud.Do protestants believe that Our Lady of Fatima, Our Lady of Guadalupe, or Our Lady of Lourdes are real? Do they discount them?
On that same note, what do protestants think about the stigmata?
Finally, have any protestants ever had any situations where they saw Mary or received the stigmata?
Sorry to ask multiple questions in one post, but they are all interconnected, so please feel free to answer one or all. Thanks.
Hebrews 1It’s absence from scripture and the fact that there is no evidence in scripture to suggest that God speaks to us in this way is all the evidence I need.