I thought that evangelical fundamentalist christians believed that all sin falls short of God’s law, thus any sin would condemn a person to Hell but for the saving grace of God through Jesus Christ? If that is so, then for any unsaved person the tiniest of sins results in eternal punishment, correct?
No. All sins are not equal. All sins evidence an equally depraved nature. Our rejection of God is what ultimately sends us to hell. Sins are just a natural outcome of our depraved nature.
And if that is the case, why do you have a hard time equating missing mass with adultery?
I just do. Would you feel worse if you missed mass or committed adultry? Which has the worst consequeces? Would you rather have a society of people who missed mass once or one that was filled with those who committed adultry once? Seriously.
Your real issue appears to be one of the difference between Catholic and Fundamentalist understandings of “salvation.” Your “question” seems to be a disguised attack on the Catholic understanding of salvation.
For you information, Fundementalism is a pejoritive term to Protestants these days. It has become equated with legalism (don’t dance, smoke, or go to movie theaters). I am not a fundementalist although I do hold to the fundementals of the faith.
To sum it up, Catholics believe that salvation can be lost, not because of any insufficiency in Jesus’ attoning sacrifice of course, but from our own human rejection of that precious God-given gift. By turning away from God, we place ourselves in mortal peril. Only by turning back to God do we again become justified by His grace (and not by any merit or work of our own).
So apstacy is the sin, not missing mass?
Your understanding - if you are a fundamentalist evangelical christian - is that you are fully justified by faith in Christ Jesus alone, and even if you sin thereafter you will still enter Heaven because you have been forever “saved” by your personal act of faith.
That is where I am at. But faith will always produce love and good works or it is not faith. We do good works because we are justified, not so that we can be justified. “We love, because he first loved us.”
Does that mean I can stand up at an altar call in your church on Sunday, “accept Jesus Christ as my personal Lord and Savior” then go on a shooting spree killing every member of your church, but ultimately end up in Heaven assuming I was sincere in my acceptance of Jesus Christ as my personal savior? Seems to me that I’d be doing all of us a favor because we’d ALL end up in Heaven if your understanding is correct, right?
(FYI - I don’t mean to offend you any more than I’m sure you meant to offend me and other Catholics by your confessional scenario above, but I’m trying to make the same sort of emotional impact. My apologies if I offend any reader’s sensibilities.)
IMHO the Catholic understanding of salvation makes a lot more sense.
One last comment, it is not the act of missing mass itself that is mortal sin, because there are valid reasons for missing mass, such as health reasons. I agree with you that if missing mass for any reason were a mortal sin, that would be “legalistic.” But the mortal sin arises from the conscious decision to turn away from God. And with the mass, this is a literal as well as a figurative decision to turn away from God.
Peace,