J
jeffreedy789
Guest
‘(If that’s your follow-up jr789, sorry for taking your thunder
.)’
no fear. my thunder is secure.

no fear. my thunder is secure.

Chris,Not sure if this has been mentioned yet, or if this is valid here, I am not as knowledgeable as most on this forum but I thought that Mass attendance fell under the Commandment to Keep Holy the Lord’s Day and so when Jesus says…If you love me, keep my commandments and also when He says the statement about Not everyone who says to me Lord, Lord will enter the kingdom…those who do the will of my Father.
We must obey the Commandments this is the will of the Father. I agree with everyone here that a person who is following the Lord, who loves the Lord would not miss Mass for an invalid reason. For a sin to be mortal or grave it must meet certain criteria: Serious matter(like breaking one of the Commandments), person knows it is serious, and the person does it anyway. When a person is angry with God, as we all are from time to time, we can either continue to be obeident to Him or sin by turning our back on Him. If we turn our back on Him (as I certainly have) then the faithful Catholic goes to Confession, repents and tries not to sin again.
I am sorry about your sister and my prayers are with you and your father.
God bless,
chris
Not necessarily. As I think was stated earlier, the Church doesn’t send people to hell. The Church does say what is a grave sin. To be a mortal sin, three things are required: 1) grave matter, 2) full advertence, and 3) perfect consent of will.Now, this may be the case with many people on a minor level. Something terrible may happen to them and they get mad at God for a day. They may wake up and not go to Mass. Now, according to this senerio, even though they have loved God their entire life and gone to mass every week, they would still go to hell.
Merely matieral sin lacks full advertence and/or perfect consent of will (subjective elements). Grave sins (murder, adultery, sloth, lust, etc), may indeed be objectively, materially grave, but may not necessarily be formal sin. When the Church speaks of the grave consequences of sin, she refers to both material and formal sins, yet all sin has serious temporal consequences whereas formal sins (and merely original sin) have eternal consequences if one remains impenitent of formal/original sin to the end.Material and Formal Sin
This distinction is based upon the difference between the objective elements (object itself, circumstances) and the subjective (advertence to the sinfulness of the act). An action which, as a matter of fact, is contrary to the Divine law but is not known to be such by the agent constitutes a material sin; whereas formal sin is committed when the agent freely transgresses the law as shown him by his conscience, whether such law really exists or is only thought to exist by him who acts. Thus, a person who takes the property of another while believing it to be his own commits a material sin; but the sin would be formal if he took the property in the belief that it belonged to another, whether his belief were correct or not. (CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Sin)
Firstly, you are not bound to attend Mass as you are not Catholic. You are not committing mortal sin by not attending Mass. BTW it is MORTAL with a “t” not “moral” sin. This is from St. John’s description of sins that are “deadly.”Lisa, I have never attended mass. I guess that I do so with full knowledge and concent. Therefore, I don’t really have a chance to make it to heaven since I commit this moral sin every week. I have never confessed it because I don’t think that it is a sin at this point. I do go to Church, but sometimes I miss.
If I still have a chance because I am not “officially” part of the Roman catholic church and therefore and invincibly ignorant, it seems best that I stay away from the Church since I would have a better chance in my ignorance than in communion with RCC. There seems to be more grace given by God for non-Catholic than Catholics
You are bound to follow what your conscience is telling you. It is the aboriginal vicar of Christ. It is there that the Holy Spirit moves you to act and believe.The matter is grave when the thing under examination is seriously contrary to the laws of God and His Church. …
Full advertence in sinning is had when we know perfectly well that we are doing a serious evil…
Perfect consent of the will is verified in sinning when we deliberately determine to do a thing although we know that thing to be sinful. (*Catechism of Pius X, *Sacrament of Penance).
ignorance denotes privation of knowledge, i.e. lack of knowledge of those things that one has a natural aptitude to know. Some of these we are under an obligation to know, those, to wit, without the knowledge of which we are unable to accomplish a due act rightly. Wherefore*** all are bound in common to know the articles of faith, and the universal principles of right***, and each individual is bound to know matters regarding his duty or state. …
… whoever neglects to have or do what he ought to have or do, commits a sin of omission. Wherefore through negligence, ignorance of what one is bound to know, is a sin; whereas it is not imputed as a sin to man, if he fails to know what he is unable to know.** Consequently ignorance of such like things is called “invincible,” because it** cannot be overcome by study. For this reason such like ignorance, not being voluntary, since it is not in our power to be rid of it, is not a sin: wherefore it is evident that no invincible ignorance is a sin. On the other hand, vincible ignorance is a sin, if it be about matters one is bound to know; but not, if it be about things one is not bound to know. (*Summa Theologica, *IIa, 76, 2)
Ignorance is “consequent” to the act of the will, in so far as ignorance itself is voluntary: and this happens in two ways, in accordance with the two aforesaid modes of voluntary (3). First, because the act of the will is brought to bear on the ignorance: as when a man wishes not to know, that he may have an excuse for sin, or that he may not be withheld from sin; according to Job 21:14: “We desire not the knowledge of Thy ways.” And*** this is called “affected ignorance.”*** Secondly, ignorance is said to be voluntary, when it regards that which one can and ought to know: for in this sense “not to act” and “not to will” are said to be voluntary, as stated above (3). And ignorance of this kind happens, either when one does not actually consider what one can and ought to consider; this is called "ignorance of evil choice," and arises from some passion or habit: or when one does not take the trouble to acquire the knowledge which one ought to have; in which sense, ignorance of the general principles of law, which one to know, is voluntary, as being due to negligence. (ST, IIa, 6, 8)
MichaelP;There are many things that cause us to be confused and angry with God. My sister was this was until the end of her life. He brought the trials of Job to her. She did not want anything to do with Him at the end because she was mad.
Many people experience this. I have as well. This does not mean that I don’t love Him still, but I may get angry with him.
My sister loved the Lord for many years. When these things came upon her, she was very confused and angry. She died a terrible death in this state of confusion.
Now, this may be the case with many people on a minor level. Something terrible may happen to them and they get mad at God for a day. They may wake up and not go to Mass. Now, according to this senerio, even though they have loved God their entire life and gone to mass every week, they would still go to hell.
It is hard to see this God in the Bible. I see one of understanding, compassion and forgiveness. This seems trivial and unlike the God of the Scriptures.
Michael
Is it possible for a person to repent in hell? In other words, think if a person who committed a mortal sin (missed mass) because he was angry with God that day, died immediately after the sin, and even though he has been a follower and lover of God all his life, he is suffering eternally in hell. Has this guy or gal suddenly become a eternal hater of God? Or do you think he can come to his senses shortly after waking up in hell, realize what he did, and then wish that he had repented? But, even though he did well and loved the Lord his entire life, he was still bound to the fate of that one sin? Or do you think that one mortal sin (such as missing mass) turned him into an eternal hater of God?MichaelP;
I agree that there are many instances in which a person can get angry with God. But that does not answer the question. You continue to misconstrue the Catholic understanding of sin and salvation in your comments. It is not as mechanical as you suggest above.
If a person misses mass because they choose to deliberately disobey God, but they repent of that sin and ask God’s forgiveness before they die, they will not go to Hell. But if they choose to deliberately disobey God’s commandments, and do not repent of their sins, they are the ones distancing themselves from God in the first place, and will not spend eternity in His presence unless and until they do repent and ask forgiveness.
Can’t you see that this result is entirely consistent with a just and loving God who is always there with arms outstretched to receive us when we ask forgiveness? I hope the other posts to this thread have shed some light on your concerns. I’ve tried my best. I wish you well in your quest for truth.
Peace,
Michael,Is it possible for a person to repent in hell? In other words, think if a person who committed a mortal sin (missed mass) because he was angry with God that day, died immediately after the sin, and even though he has been a follower and lover of God all his life, he is suffering eternally in hell. Has this guy or gal suddenly become a eternal hater of God? Or do you think he can come to his senses shortly after waking up in hell, realize what he did, and then wish that he had repented? But, even though he did well and loved the Lord his entire life, he was still bound to the fate of that one sin? Or do you think that one mortal sin (such as missing mass) turned him into an eternal hater of God?
The mortal sin behind it is knowledge ,free will and deliberate consent. If you have circumstances that interfere with any of those it is not mortal.God BlessAll of you have simply said that if a person turns their back on God, Apostacy, they will go to hell. None of you have said that it was missing mass that was the mortal sin, but the heart of the individual behind the mortal sin. Each of you have said that a person would not miss mass unless his heart was evil and deserving of hell because he has rejected God. So, again, apostacy is the sin, not missing mass? But missing mass might evidence this apostacy, but not necessarily, since there might be other reasons besides apostacy (turning away from God) that caused the person to miss mass.
This makes more sense. I just could not get by the fact that someone could believe that missing one mass without a valid excuse necessarily was going to send them to hell. I think that you all might want to find better ways to communicate this if this is the case. You will have people going to mass only so they will not go to hell. That does ot seem like good motivation.
Just my thoughts.
Michael
Actually, I believe, like Tomas Aquinas, that the condemnation of all people based upon the one sin of Adam was a gracious impution that identifies us all with the first Adam* so that* we could then be identified with the second Adam. If God had not imputed his sin to us, then He could not have imputed Christ’s reughteousness to us. But Catholics do not believe in imputed sin or righteousness the way that would make this understandable.michaelp,
Please answer these questions: Do you (from our limited human perspective) think it is fair that all humanity would suffer because Adam and Eve ate some fruit? Do you really think eating some fruit is worth death? What do you think is worse, eating some fruit, commiting adultery or missing Mass?