L
ltwin
Guest
Yes, I actually find the way Eastern Orthodox understand hell as a useful way to think about hell in relation to God’s love.The idea that hell is the absence of God is not something Orthodox believe (Hell is the presence of God, actually).
I agree that God does not change, we do. However, I think we have to emphasize both God’s love and his justice. Sin is not just some internal rot within us that makes God repugnant to us, but sin is an affront to God’s honor and his justice and it can never be ignored.Sin does not, as is a common Roman belief, in Orthodoxy, sever one’s relationship with Christ. The separation is more emotional/spiritual, in that it fundamentally alters the relationship so that He becomes unloved by us. God doesn’t change - we do. We do not become deserving of punishment because of a sin in the parent/child paradigm (i.e. you did this, so I am going to do this to you) but rather our punishments are self inflicted in our rejection of All That is Good. (I’m talking differently than those griefs which God does send us which bring us closer to Him - they are not given to us because we sin).
I do believe in substitutionary atonement more or less, but I also see how the Orthodox view is also true. I don’t think they are mutually exclusive.The last paragraph of your second quote, if it is meant to convey a Substitutionary Atonement model of Salvation, is rejected by Orthodoxy. Christ on the Cross is not taking the punishment we deserve. For a greater explanation of this difference and sin in general I highly recommend this short video.
Of course, I don’t think the man in the video was being entirely fair to the Protestant view either.