Ralphy's Questions for Catholics

  • Thread starter Thread starter CentralFLJames
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I agree there are too many to go over all at one time. So, since I’m easily distracted why don’t we pick one at a time. Either the ones you mentioned in your previous posts or one of these. I just can’t blanket discuss several different issues simultaneously though. You pick. Where do we start?
I agree with you, lets start here. The Cath.church teaches: Mary was preserved from all stain of original sin from the first instant of her conception. God says: Mary, a decendant of Adam,was born in sin. (Psalm 51:5; Romans 5:12. Ralph
 
I was conceived in sin as you were, that is original sin.
Which is what causes us to go to Hell.
I said that at the “age of reason”, one must decide to accept or reject Christ as Savior.
What difference does the age of reason make? Does one only just acquire the sin of Adam at that time? :confused:
 
Where did you get this “eating the meat of the Lamb of God,which was sacrificed each year at 3 :00 pm on friday,to be eaten the following saturday”. Do you know what the passover represents? Ralph
Yes; it is the prefiguration of Christ’s death on the Cross, which frees us from the slavery of sin.
 
Which is what causes us to go to Hell.

What difference does the age of reason make? Does one only just acquire the sin of Adam at that time? :confused:
The age of reason is when you are at the point of understanding that you are a sinner and you are on your way to hell unless you do something about it. Ralph
 
Yes; it is the prefiguration of Christ’s death on the Cross, which frees us from the slavery of sin.
I was looking for a different answer,like: when was the original passover,and why was it,etc. Ralph
 
The age of reason is when you are at the point of understanding that you are a sinner and you are on your way to hell unless you do something about it. Ralph
Fine for you but that’s not what the Catholic Church teaches. Just to make sure no one reading this thread is confused.
 
The age of reason is when you are at the point of understanding that you are a sinner and you are on your way to hell unless you do something about it. Ralph
Aren’t they still a sinner and on their way to Hell even before that, though? It is Original Sin; not personal sin, that causes one to go to Hell. (Personal sin compounds the problem, and perhaps causes you to descend to a lower and more painful region of Hell, but even without committing any personal sins at all, the unregenerate pagan still goes to Hell.)
 
Aren’t they still a sinner and on their way to Hell even before that, though? It is Original Sin; not personal sin, that causes one to go to Hell. (Personal sin compounds the problem, and perhaps causes you to descend to a lower and more painful region of Hell, but even without committing any personal sins at all, the unregenerate pagan still goes to Hell.)
:)jm,in saying this you are on very thin ice.cause we really can not judge the unregenerated pagan,unless they have had the opportunity to first hear the good news…what of all the souls born after Christ that yet did not hear the good news of our saviour?are they to be condemended cause they had not the opportunity to hear the good news?From the Gospel written by St.John9;41"Jesus said to them,“if you were blind you would not have sin.But now that you say ‘we see’ your sin remains”…Even th good of the past(those before)Christ were not in hell but in the land of the dead awaiting His birth,so that when He came to them after His death they would recieve the good news.And be judged after that.
 
:)jm,in saying this you are on very thin ice.cause we really can not judge the unregenerated pagan,unless they have had the opportunity to first hear the good news…what of all the souls born after Christ that yet did not hear the good news of our saviour?are they to be condemended cause they had not the opportunity to hear the good news?From the Gospel written by St.John9;41"Jesus said to them,“if you were blind you would not have sin.But now that you say ‘we see’ your sin remains”…Even th good of the past(those before)Christ were not in hell but in the land of the dead awaiting His birth,so that when He came to them after His death they would recieve the good news.And be judged after that.
Actually, what we don’t know is whether there are any unregenerate pagans, because God could, in His own way, choose to regenerate anyone He pleases, and make them Catholics without our aid - He could raise up children to Abraham from the stones, so certainly He can change pagans into Catholics.

But, if they exist, they are going to Hell. 😉

And it still remains that, without Baptism of some kind, or else without some unknown miraculous action from God, everyone goes to Hell, even if they never actually sin. You don’t have to be a “bad person” to go to Hell - you simply have to never have been brought into the Christian covenant of grace.
 
I agree with you, lets start here. The Cath.church teaches: Mary was preserved from all stain of original sin from the first instant of her conception. God says: Mary, a decendant of Adam,was born in sin. (Psalm 51:5; Romans 5:12. Ralph
Thanks. This is a particularly interesting one. So lets start by looking at your scripture citations:

Psalm 51
Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.

Romans 5:12
Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned.

So, these are interesting. Psalm 51:1 says this is a “psalm of David: when Nathan the prophet came unto him, after he had gone in to Bath-sheba.” It looks like this is written by David lamenting about his sins. Note the “I” in the verse you quote. Now while this may directly refer to David, its useful for us to acknowledge similar concerns when we sin ourselves. As David said, “Purge me with hyssop, and I shall be clean: wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow.” We want to be clean and we depend on God to cleanse us.

Catholics believe Mary was kept clean by God by a singular act of grace. Keeping his mother as a clean vessel was fitting and in keeping with the fulfillment of they Old Testament type of the Ark of the Covenant. We believe that Mary is the New Eve and the Ark of the New Covenant. This is not explicit in the Bible. Most of the support is in the early writings of the Church.

In Romans 15:12 you have a problem with saying there is an impossibility for any man (or woman) to have not sinned. If this is the case then either Jesus was not a man or this does not apply in the way you think. All of us would agree that this applies to most everyone but there must be at least one exception.

As in Romans 15:19 “For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so also by one Man’s obedience many will be made righteous.” Again, we believe Mary is a New Eve (and as first fruits of the Church in her splendor) corresponding to the New Adam of Christ. So in her obedience, her yes to God, we believe she also participated in a complementary way to Christ’s definitive obedience to the Father.

And in Romans 15:21 “so grace might reign through righteousness to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.” Mary is a sign of our ultimate end glorified and reigning through rightousness in eternal life with Jesus. She has no gifts he did not give her, no honor he did not bestow. She is our races greatest and singular honor, the handiwork of the Father and the beloved mother of the Son.

Did I miss something or do you think I’ve misinterpreted something or do you have a direct scriptural reference to help me understand your position better? If so, I’d love to look it over. I promise, I’ve looked and looked. I just don’t see anything that would discount the Catholic interpretation without taking the words out of context. I know you would not lead me into error so please help me see things your way.

Also, just a quote isn’t as helpful as your interpretation. How can I know what you believe if you don’t tell me. It’s not like the words will interpret themselves.
 
Actually, what we don’t know is whether there are any unregenerate pagans, because God could, in His own way, choose to regenerate anyone He pleases, and make them Catholics without our aid - He could raise up children to Abraham from the stones, so certainly He can change pagans into Catholics.

But, if they exist, they are going to Hell. 😉

And it still remains that, without Baptism of some kind, or else without some unknown miraculous action from God, everyone goes to Hell, even if they never actually sin. You don’t have to be a “bad person” to go to Hell - you simply have to never have been brought into the Christian covenant of grace.
Why would God regenerate one just to condem them?At what point in the the lives of these “pagans” would the creator choose to regenerate them?

Baptism of desire…which can only be recieved after death.now since baptism cleanses one of all sin one could not conclude that one who has been regenerated in this manner is condemed.
 
Why would God regenerate one just to condem them?
:confused:

If they are regenerated, then they are going to go to Heaven - unless they sin in the meantime. We normally become regenerated in Baptism - that’s why it’s referred to as being “born again.”
At what point in the the lives of these “pagans” would the creator choose to regenerate them?
Who can say? If God is doing it in some invisible manner, there would be no way for us to know.
Baptism of desire…which can only be recieved after death.now since baptism cleanses one of all sin one could not conclude that one who has been regenerated in this manner is condemed.
Right! 👍
 
Baptism saves! All in heaven will have been either baptized by desire for baptism, baptism of blood, or the normal way–baptism of water.

Has anyone asked Ralphy if he believes James when he says that we are not saved by faith alone but works? If Ralphy believes the bible doesn’t he have to believe that verse?

And has anyone asked Ralphy if he WORKS out his salvation with fear and trembling like Paul tells us to do? That is in the bible, too.

And has anyone asked Ralphy if “All” means “each and everyone” ALWAYS in every verse of scripture of the bible?

I don’t really expect Ralphy do ponder such questions IF he has already made his mind up and is here not to learn but to draw people away from the Catholic faith–that may not be the case–I certainly hope it isn’t.

So I’ll ask Ralphy this question: do you think it is God’s will for people to try to persuade Catholics to leave the Catholic faith?

I sure hope you don’t believe such a thing Ralphy.

I eagerly await your responses to these questions.
 
I would love to heart the Protestant argument for why faith+works=damnation. If the simple equation is faith=salvation then how does one become damned by exceeding the requirements? Why do Protestants think Catholics need to be saved - we all have faith? Or do Protestants judge our faith to be made deficient by our works? If this is the case then their argument is circular and they argue against the supremacy of faith; that is if work becomes a sin how is it that faith can not subdue this one particular form of sin?

Sola Fide is utterly irrational.

James
 
If you read my earlier email you would have seen that I said that as far as I can understand all children who pass away befor the age of reason go to heaven. As far as the mentally handicapped are concern (and I have a grandson like that) they probably never reach the age of reason, so they will go to heaven. Ralph
I would like to see your scriptural source for this. First you say we are destined for Hell, now you claim we are not. How many times have I heard - if people don’t accept Jesus as their personal Lord and Savior, they go to Hell - no exceptions.

This is not a trivial question, nor a trivial point. The fact is, there is no basis in scripture for your statements at all, yet you are quite comfortable drawing these conclusions.

Sounds like tradition - oops, better make that Tradition. This is one of the MANY reasons why we have a Church - to teach us in areas where scripture is silent.
 
At the last supper, this was the discussion according to Matt 26:26-28

While they were eating, Jesus took bread, said the blessing, broke it, and giving it to his disciples said, “Take and eat; this is my body.” Then he took a cup, gave thanks, 16 and gave it to them, saying, "Drink from it, all of you, for this is my blood of the covenant, *which will be shed *on behalf of many for the forgiveness of sins.
I would like to add to this.

Jesus clarifies for us whether the body and blood at the last supper are symbolic or his actual flesh and blood.
I’ve underline ‘which will be shed’.
Was the blood he shed his actual blood or his symbolic blood?
He tells us at the last supper which blood he has in the cup… it is THE blood which will be shed.

michel
 
I would like to add to this.

Jesus clarifies for us whether the body and blood at the last supper are symbolic or his actual flesh and blood.
I’ve underline ‘which will be shed’.
Was the blood he shed his actual blood or his symbolic blood?
He tells us at the last supper which blood he has in the cup… it is THE blood which will be shed.

michel
You are correct my friend, this was a symbol of what was to come (will be shed) and not His actual body and blood at that time. Ralph
 
You are correct my friend, this was a symbol of what was to come (will be shed) and not His actual body and blood at that time. Ralph
Sorry Ralphy. Wrong again. How real the Presence was is shown by the words of institution. They can be understood only in the literal sense. “This is my body . . . This cup is the new covenant in my blood” (Luke 22:19-20).

Time for you to put your Scofield’s away. You are taking the interpretation from an extra-biblical source which defeats the (your) bible alone premise.
 
You are correct my friend, this was a symbol of what was to come (will be shed) and not His actual body and blood at that time. Ralph
Try reading John 6 Ralphy. Jesus fulfiiled the promise he gave to his disciples contained in these verses at the Last Supper.

It’s time for you to wake up!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top