Ahh … but realize … that you don’t believe in the Word of God as written … you believe in an interpretation of God’s Word … that I’ll bet someone else gave to you.
You and I see the same scripture and have different understandings of what that scripture is
actually saying. I do not recognize YOUR interpretation as scriptural.
You share a verse … I respond by sharing the context around that scripture and we should then discuss … but … you do not wish to discuss scripture. There is no reasoning in your discussion.
You do in fact follow some man’s religion … either your own, or the one that taught you or gave you a list of scriptures to cite. Have you actually even read the New Testament front to back on your own even once?
We have the MOST regard for the Word of God … and you should thank the Catholic Church for giving it to the world and protecting it for centuries upon centuries.
“Ralph’s Religion” is pretty shallow indeed, incapable of reasonably ***discussing ***scripture. Seems like lip service that you regard scripture so highly, but will not engage in discussion about it. You merely paste citations. “Ralph’s Dogmas” seem to be limited to listing citations without the need to understand scripture.
You say you will follow God’s Word … step one is to read it.
I’m anxious for you to make a dedicated effort to actually read the New Testament through.
Here’s a link to an online RSV (Revised Standard Version - Non-Catholic).
quod.lib.umich.edu/r/rsv/browse.html
If you prefer the language of the KJV (King James Version) here’s a link to this as well.
quod.lib.umich.edu/k/kjv/browse.html
michel