RCIA whining

  • Thread starter Thread starter DarkLight
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
There’s a big difference between explaining Christ’s presence in the Eucharist, and what the OP said:

My other big issue is that I have trouble with understanding the concepts of infallibility and the dogmas. A lot of the common presentations seem very unclear - e.g. exactly what the metaphysical concepts in the dogma of transubstantiation are, as opposed to various popular explanations of transubstantiation.

Metaphysical concepts? You’ve got to be kidding!

I stress at various times that we believe in the Real Presence in the Eucharist. We might be talking about forms of prayer and use Eucharistic adoration as an example. And I’m asking “Why do we adore the Eucharist? What’s special about it? Are we adoring a piece of bread?” Later we may talk about entering the Blessed Sacrament Chapel in our parish and I’m asking “Why are we reverent in there? What does the candle mean? Why do we genuflect when we enter/” And what I’m hoping for is that if they hear enough times that Jesus is truly present in the Eucharist, the idea will sink in.

There may be people who have studied theology and are knowledgeable about things. Those aren’t the people I meet in RCIA!
I have several degrees in theology and I don’t think I can adequately explain the metaphysical concepts of the Eucharist other than mention accidents and substance. If the OP wants an in-depth explanation she should read Aquinas.
 
I But I went to RCIA EVERY SINGLE WEEK. Making a commitment to show up and BE Catholic is the act of becoming Catholic for real. I wasn’t playing at it, and I still am not playing at it.
I’m not sure I understand the feeling in this thread that RCIA is a truly necessary step for entring the Church. It wasn’t there in its current form until Vatican II, and AFAIK it wasn’t there at all for centuries. Holy converts such as Bl. John Henry Cardinal Newman didn’t go through it. It’s not required now.

I am not saying it is not good. I am not saying that we should not follow the recommendation of the Church to enter this way if we can. But OTOH, the Church does not require that people come in to the Church that way, so it is not fair for us to be more strict about that than the Church is.

Also the picture that seems to be emerging of RCIA as some sort of unofficial, untrained group therapy session is very troubling. Knowledge of instruction techniques and Catholic doctrine do NOT qualify someone as a group therapist. Just because you want to be Catholic does not mean you have to tell a group of people things about your history or even your spiritual journey. Nickybr38’s story is extremely troubling, as serious psychological damage could have been done to her cousin by someone who was not in any way qualified, but nonetheless felt they could push for personal revelations in a group setting. If RCIA is really like this, it may be doing more harm than good. I’m hoping in most instances it isn’t like this.

RCIA is not supposed to be primarily a fellowship activity. It is primarily supposed to be a learning activity. There is some sense in which can be a test of obedience to attend if possible, but there is NO precept or even recommendation that people have to reveal their personal histories in public in order to enter the Church. Shy and private people ARE allowed into the Church without having to do violence to their personalities. You MAY refuse to share your history with people if you want to, and if people push you to reveal it you can tell them it makes you uncomfortable and ask them to stop, and if they don’t stop, take it up with the pastor.

And sitting through a bunch of classes that teach the very basics of Catholicism when you already know them is not inherently good, just because you are doing it with a lot of other people who may or may not become Catholic. HOWEVER, the problem is that you don’t always know what you don’t know. Unless you go through it (life or with the text), you don’t know for sure that you aren’t missing something you could have a problem with. Maybe in your case, DarkLight, that isn’t an issue, but it’s one of those things that is hard to know ahead of time.

DarkLight, God is infinite and the Church is vast. You will not know all about God in this lifetime, and you won’t know all about the Church before you become Catholic. If you believe that the Catholic Church is the Church that was founded by Jesus Christ, and that the Holy Spirit has caused Her to teach dogma infallibly, then you will have to accept some things on faith before you know all about them. Sometimes in questions of faith, you have to accept something before you can understand it, and sometimes, like with transsubstantiation, it’s not really possible to understand this 100% before death. You can know what it means, but you won’t be able to understand 100% how it works. Most things are not like this, but there are some.

When I came back to the Church, there were a lot of things I didn’t know then, that I know now. When I die, God willing, I will know a lot of things I don’t know now.

God bless you, DarkLight–may He give you comfort and peace about the things that you have suffered in the past, and bring you joyfully into His Church.

–Jen
 
There’s a big difference between explaining Christ’s presence in the Eucharist, and what the OP said:

My other big issue is that I have trouble with understanding the concepts of infallibility and the dogmas. A lot of the common presentations seem very unclear - e.g. exactly what the metaphysical concepts in the dogma of transubstantiation are, as opposed to various popular explanations of transubstantiation.

Metaphysical concepts? You’ve got to be kidding!

I stress at various times that we believe in the Real Presence in the Eucharist. We might be talking about forms of prayer and use Eucharistic adoration as an example. And I’m asking “Why do we adore the Eucharist? What’s special about it? Are we adoring a piece of bread?” Later we may talk about entering the Blessed Sacrament Chapel in our parish and I’m asking “Why are we reverent in there? What does the candle mean? Why do we genuflect when we enter/” And what I’m hoping for is that if they hear enough times that Jesus is truly present in the Eucharist, the idea will sink in.

There may be people who have studied theology and are knowledgeable about things. Those aren’t the people I meet in RCIA!
A clarification on the transubstantiation thing: I wasn’t saying I have to understand it. I was complaining that I feel like a lot of the teaching I get confuses the explanations of transubstantiation with the dogma of transubstantiation. Like people will present the Thomistic explanation involving substance and accidents as if that particular explanation was the dogma.

I’m a philosopher. I do metaphysics as part of my job. This particular explanation commits you to some pretty heavy metaphysical claims that will affect all sorts of other things - in many cases things that I don’t find much other reason to believe. Specifically, it commits you to an Aristotelean view of the nature of objects - all objects, not just the sacrament. So it’s sort of a big deal to be able to have someone explain, properly, the dogma and clearly delineate the dogma from opinions about the dogma.
 
So I had my first talk with the RCIA director yesterday. I don’t so far have any major issues, just…the program seems so stupid!

(1) We’re using the YouCat book as the primary text. I mean, it’s a nice little book and all, but it’s still a kid’s catechism. I read through it already, it’s got a lot of basic points but doesn’t really do any work to explain them.

(2) The director seems to assume that people coming in had absolutely no grasp of the sacraments or what was going on. I find this odd - why would I start RCIA if I didn’t know the theology already?

(3) The few times I did try to ask a question, I got the baby “well we think baptism is very important” type of answers. I know it’s important, that’s why I was asking!

I know I have to go through it, but…ugh. I’d like somewhere to go where I can get real answers, not stuff that’s suitable for 12 year old children.
DarkLight, there is no need to share anything you don’t want to share. Much of my past is, as well, one I don’t discuss. I discuss my faith. That is what you can share in your group.

As someone who has taught RCIA for a short time now, I will relate my own experience on this side of things, that I think is relevant to your situation. The first class I taught was on the Bible. It was meant to give people a general understanding of what, where, why, how all these separate writings came together into one book, that we call the Bible. The importance of scripture to our faith, etc. I was nervous, but prepared, studied, prayed, and hoped that I wasn’t going to bore people to tears. One of the people in our class was a Phd, a professor and a lifelong practicing, knowledgeable Protestant. I, however, am a fifty year old community college student. I was a bit unnerved, thinking I was surely making a fool of myself, thinking I could teach someone like him, anything.

I was relieved, like you wouldn’t believe, when he shared his knowledge, and his faith with the class. All of the class benefited from his participation. He and his wife became very close to one of our catechumens who came from a non-Christian background, and had serious lifelong struggles. They took him under their wing, literally. I don’t think he would have made it, in RCIA or his life, really, without them. They grew in faith and friendship together.

The RCIA process is important to building your faith, in a community of disciples. Be a part of the community. Continue your studies and prayers outside of class. The RCIA team is on your side. This is a time of discernment, as others have pointed out. For you, and the RCIA team as well. The fact is, if a person isn’t coming to class every week, they either aren’t serious, or need to arrange to be taught what they miss because of scheduling conflicts. Work with the RCIA team. Seek out a mentor, such as a deacon or priest in your parish. They are all there to support you on your journey.

Hope that helps.
 
Furthermore, are you converting from Protestantism?

I think us former Protestants struggle especially hard with these things because to us any sort of Church teaching or Bible Studies are about hard facts and Scripture, not feelings. We seek fellowship at church, during and after the service, we don’t seek in studies.

At all the Catholic bible studies I’ve been to it’s all been about how we FEEL about Scripture. There is rarely any discussion that focuses on intellect. Mind you, that’s just in MY parish.

Anyway, I think a lot of Protestant converts come in wanting to grow in FAITH and wanting to LEARN. They’re not as interested in the social aspect. Whereas Catholic reverts and/or cradle Catholics seem to be more focused on the community aspect.

Just saying I think this is where the frustration comes in. Expectations and experience have taught us to value different things so RCIA, if it is NOT intellectually based, ends up being a huge disappointment.

Edited to Add: AND most converts from Protestantism who come to RCIA on their own have ALREADY gone through the spiritual journey. Usually they’re hungry for FOOD (intellectual) by the time they reach RCIA. For me I went through all the spiritual stuff a year before I ever signed up for RCIA. 🙂

So it was kind of annoying to have to discuss how warm God makes us feel and how nice Jesus was to us. :rolleyes:
Funny, im a protestant convert and in my current experience, it is just the opposite when it comes to bible studies I have been to as a protestant being about how we feel about the particular verse or passage we are reading. I can recall the phrase “I feel like that verse means…” thrown around a lot at one of the past protsetant bible studies I attended. I recall wanting to get into the scripture on a deeper level all the time, while most the others only wanted to talk about how it “made them feel” or “how it relates to them” Which is all good, but I really wanted to discuss more. But I am only 2 weeks into rcia so maybe that feely stuff will come up later too. 🙂 Right now, nobody really says anything unless asked somthing.
 
Funny, im a protestant convert and in my current experience, it is just the opposite when it comes to bible studies I have been to as a protestant being about how we feel about the particular verse or passage we are reading. I can recall the phrase “I feel like that verse means…” thrown around a lot at one of the past protsetant bible studies I attended. I recall wanting to get into the scripture on a deeper level all the time, while most the others only wanted to talk about how it “made them feel” or “how it relates to them” Which is all good, but I really wanted to discuss more. But I am only 2 weeks into rcia so maybe that feely stuff will come up later too. 🙂 Right now, nobody really says anything unless asked somthing.
None of the Bible Studies at my parish are a “I feel” Or “What it means to me” study. That is called Bible Sharing. I used to attend a Protestant Bible Study and it was just as the poster above described–a sharing session.

There are many Catholic Bible Study programs out there that are actual studies and parishes use them frequently. In addition, they may have videos with lectures from Bibles scholars. But these studies, like the ones Scott Hahn and Curtis Mitch published, or the Collegeville program are from top notch scholars and the “I feel” element is missing. My parish also hosts one every week that a priest, who also is a Bible scholar and active in Jewish-Christian dialogue, teaches. I’ve been to a couple and it is quite an experience to be able to ask questions of a person who is knowledgeable in the original languages and knows Scripture like the back of his hand.

Also, I have been on the RCIA team for years and we have never had a sharing session, except for the first session when we ask why are you here. But the team also tells them a little bit about themselves, also, such as how long have they belonged to the parish, are they a convert or cradle, Catholic, their occupation–nothing serious. And all participation is voluntary. I don’t even know what the purpose of a psychological sharing would be, or why it would be done. I do know that the vast majority of RCIA programs are not like that.
 
After reading all the comments, there’s something emerging here:
  1. There’s the idea that you, DarkLight, want to investigate theological things in a lot of depth. That’s fine, but it’s not necessarily a part of the practical act of becoming Catholic. There are probably as many people who study all these things academically and in depth from outside the Catholic Church as there are studying them with the same intensity inside the Catholic church.
  2. The act of becoming Catholic by becoming part of the parish and learning to practice the faith in some concrete practical ways.
I’m not really sure which one or both you’re trying to accomplish. It sounds like you’re trying to accomplish the first while avoiding the second. This is not so uncommon. There are a lot of people in this category, if you want to know the truth. We also have people who want to accomplish the second while denying that the first is even possible or necessary. It’s quite a mess, because both aspects and the holy balance between them is necessary.

Becoming Catholic requires knowledge PLUS assent PLUS participation.

PS: Previous posters are correct. RCIA should not be a psychotherapy session, or a group encounter session. No one should be pressing you for overly personal information. If that’s what’s going on, you should switch to a different parish. But in like manner, you should be able to go to all the weekly RCIA sessions without spilling your personal or deeply psychological information too…you might have to go and participate in a proper manner for a class. “Sharing” for the purpose of a class doesn’t really mean spilling everything you know about yourself…
 
Also, I have been on the RCIA team for years and we have never had a sharing session, except for the first session when we ask why are you here. But the team also tells them a little bit about themselves, also, such as how long have they belonged to the parish, are they a convert or cradle, Catholic, their occupation–nothing serious. And all participation is voluntary. I don’t even know what the purpose of a psychological sharing would be, or why it would be done. I do know that the vast majority of RCIA programs are not like that.
Correct. If you’re having trouble with a particular RCIA series, you should change parishes rather than try to get through it without attending the sessions.

But I’m confused about whether that’s the real issue or not, at this point. See my previous post.
 
So I had my first talk with the RCIA director yesterday. I don’t so far have any major issues, just…the program seems so stupid!

(1) We’re using the YouCat book as the primary text. I mean, it’s a nice little book and all, but it’s still a kid’s catechism. I read through it already, it’s got a lot of basic points but doesn’t really do any work to explain them.

(2) The director seems to assume that people coming in had absolutely no grasp of the sacraments or what was going on. I find this odd - why would I start RCIA if I didn’t know the theology already?

(3) The few times I did try to ask a question, I got the baby “well we think baptism is very important” type of answers. I know it’s important, that’s why I was asking!

I know I have to go through it, but…ugh. I’d like somewhere to go where I can get real answers, not stuff that’s suitable for 12 year old children.
There are a lot of reasons people come into the RCIA - not everyone is as knowledgeable as you are. We try to tailor our RCIA to the level that the people are at, but if we have someone who knows absolutely nothing about God (their reason for becoming Catholic is cultural rather than religious), we have to keep things pretty basic - and I know that’s frustrating for the more advanced people, but it’s important to make sure the lowest students are able to grasp the content of the lesson. It means that the more advanced students have to be patient sometimes.

We also welcome people to share their knowledge, as well. If you have something to contribute to the conversation, feel free to do so. We can always learn from each other. 🙂
(2) The director seems to assume that people coming in had absolutely no grasp of the sacraments or what was going on. I find this odd - why would I start RCIA if I didn’t know the theology already?
This is actually a pretty safe assumption, in most cases. Most people come to RCIA in order to learn what they need to know to become Catholic; not because they already know everything.

A lot of people come to RCIA because they have a mother-in-law who is insisting that her grandchildren be raised Catholic. Some of these people have no concept of God at all, and have to start from the very beginning. In so many cases, the only time they have ever been inside of a Catholic church was when they got married to their Catholic spouse.

I would say, attend the RCIA classes, learn what you can, but also make use of other resources. And keep your sponsor updated on what you are learning.
 
After reading all the comments, there’s something emerging here:
  1. There’s the idea that you, DarkLight, want to investigate theological things in a lot of depth. That’s fine, but it’s not necessarily a part of the practical act of becoming Catholic. There are probably as many people who study all these things academically and in depth from outside the Catholic Church as there are studying them with the same intensity inside the Catholic church.
I guess…I just have a different idea of “depth” than what many people seem to. I can’t imagine even starting to consider joining any church at all without having a grasp on their basic theology. I feel like I’m being offered the sort of stuff I’d want to know before deciding it was ok to keep going to that particular church on a regular basis, let alone make any moves toward joining it. I just can’t understand why anyone would sign up for RCIA without understanding basic Catholic theology - it seems highly irresponsible to me to do that.

I really don’t understand the cultural or familial idea here. Why would I get involved with someone if we didn’t share values? And why should the culture around me matter to me? I don’t even understand how you could base any sort of faith off of this.
  1. The act of becoming Catholic by becoming part of the parish and learning to practice the faith in some concrete practical ways.
I’m not really sure which one or both you’re trying to accomplish. It sounds like you’re trying to accomplish the first while avoiding the second. This is not so uncommon. There are a lot of people in this category, if you want to know the truth. We also have people who want to accomplish the second while denying that the first is even possible or necessary. It’s quite a mess, because both aspects and the holy balance between them is necessary.
I’m not sure where you’re getting this? I don’t attend the first half of the year of classes because I have a schedule conflict. As I’ve pointed out repeatedly, I am attending Mass regularly (as well as Adoration, which I hadn’t mentioned previously). RCIA is not an intrinsic part of practicing the faith, so I don’t feel that by missing it I’m not being a good Catholic or something. I don’t know what more involvement I could even be doing.
Becoming Catholic requires knowledge PLUS assent PLUS participation.
PS: Previous posters are correct. RCIA should not be a psychotherapy session, or a group encounter session. No one should be pressing you for overly personal information. If that’s what’s going on, you should switch to a different parish. But in like manner, you should be able to go to all the weekly RCIA sessions without spilling your personal or deeply psychological information too…you might have to go and participate in a proper manner for a class. “Sharing” for the purpose of a class doesn’t really mean spilling everything you know about yourself…
The difficulty is…well, anyone who has a past of abuse knows this. What’s “overly personal” is incredibly varied. Often there is no answer to common questions that isn’t overly personal, because people don’t expect there to have been anything significant or personal happening. I don’t really feel comfortable talking about my religious background at all, because I don’t think there’s any way to do it that doesn’t share stuff that’s too personal - essentially religious abuse. Most people don’t even consider that this might be an issue, because they haven’t experienced this sort of thing.

Edit: I’m really not trying to show off. I guess…the more I hear, the more it sounds like RCIA is tailored to deal with people who are approaching religion flippantly. I can’t understand this mindset - why would you do that? I’ve always had taking religion seriously just be expected. Even as an atheist - people were atheists because they’d done the research and came to the conclusion that atheism was true, not just because they felt like it or didn’t care.
 
I guess…the more I hear, the more it sounds like RCIA is tailored to deal with people who are approaching religion flippantly. I can’t understand this mindset - why would you do that? I’ve always had taking religion seriously just be expected. Even as an atheist - people were atheists because they’d done the research and came to the conclusion that atheism was true, not just because they felt like it or didn’t care.
I’m like that, too, but most people don’t think like that at all - for them, the important things are where they get their money from, their spare time activities, and their kids. A lot of people’s lives revolve around their sports or their hobbies. They don’t think very much about the questions of origin, or God, or morality. They are what they are because of family connections, and to be like their friends.
 
I guess…I just have a different idea of “depth” than what many people seem to. I can’t imagine even starting to consider joining any church at all without having a grasp on their basic theology. I feel like I’m being offered the sort of stuff I’d want to know before deciding it was ok to keep going to that particular church on a regular basis, let alone make any moves toward joining it. I just can’t understand why anyone would sign up for RCIA without understanding basic Catholic theology - it seems highly irresponsible to me to do that.

Edit: I’m really not trying to show off. I guess…the more I hear, the more it sounds like RCIA is tailored to deal with people who are approaching religion flippantly. I can’t understand this mindset - why would you do that? I’ve always had taking religion seriously just be expected. Even as an atheist - people were atheists because they’d done the research and came to the conclusion that atheism was true, not just because they felt like it or didn’t care.
Okay. I know that you are truly an intelligent person, but you are coming across as condescending toward other people when you are questioning why they are considering becoming Catholic when they obviously do not have the grasp of all things Catholic that you do. “Flippant?” You obviously know way more than some people that teach the RCIA classes, but sometimes you just need to do the research on your own to find the answers that you are seeking. As someone else said, this is a class for the average, middle of the road person that desires to become Catholic. They don’t all have degrees in anything, let alone metaphysics. You are making this into something way more intense than it has to be. I am happy you feel the need to dig so deeply. But you cannot expect everyone to share your intensity. It isn’t what the majority of people taking the class are experiencing. Nor do I feel that your intensity is necessary for all people–only for you. So you are the one that needs to go out into a college campus or make an appointment with a priest, and get the answers you seek. RCIA is not the place for it.
 
I feel your pain.

Grit your teeth, play along, but when you get home, curl up with a chai latte and a copy of this: amazon.com/Fundamentals-Catholic-Dogma-Dr-Ludwig/dp/0895550091

or this: amazon.com/Moral-Theology-Heribert-Jone/dp/1258136406/ (ignore the “new” price, get a used copy for 1¢)

or this: amazon.com/Radio-Replies-Volumes-1-3-ebook/dp/B008NJEAZ6/ (that’s the kindle edition for 99¢, otherwise it’s a 3-volume paperback totalling over a thousand pages of questions you never even thought to ask)

Back when I was where you’re at now, these got me through. I devoured them like a dog with stolen sausages.
Thanks for the link, I just bought that. 🙂
 
I guess…I just have a different idea of “depth” than what many people seem to. I can’t imagine even starting to consider joining any church at all without having a grasp on their basic theology. I feel like I’m being offered the sort of stuff I’d want to know before deciding it was ok to keep going to that particular church on a regular basis, let alone make any moves toward joining it. I just can’t understand why anyone would sign up for RCIA without understanding basic Catholic theology - it seems highly irresponsible to me to do that.
You may have some unusual attitudes about religion. Unusual, meaning not typical. Just letting you know.
I really don’t understand the cultural or familial idea here. Why would I get involved with someone if we didn’t share values? And why should the culture around me matter to me? I don’t even understand how you could base any sort of faith off of this.
Values are not only intellectual. Showing up and participating with other people are also values.
I’m not sure where you’re getting this? I don’t attend the first half of the year of classes because I have a schedule conflict. As I’ve pointed out repeatedly, I am attending Mass regularly (as well as Adoration, which I hadn’t mentioned previously). RCIA is not an intrinsic part of practicing the faith, so I don’t feel that by missing it I’m not being a good Catholic or something. I don’t know what more involvement I could even be doing.
Your schedule conflict appears to be more important to you than showing up for this other thing. That’s a telling bit of information. People say all kinds of things, but what they actually physically do usually tells everything about what they really think deep down.

And, DarkLight, you are not the authority on what’s intrinsic to joining the Church and what’s not. The parish priest and RCIA director of the parish that you choose actually have those jobs, not you. Make an appointment, talk to them, and let them decide with you what comes next. And then all of you make a plan for you to carry out if you are going to do this thing–become Catholic. They can help you. Coming on CAF and “whining,” as you yourself called it, not so much.
The difficulty is…well, anyone who has a past of abuse knows this. What’s “overly personal” is incredibly varied. Often there is no answer to common questions that isn’t overly personal, because people don’t expect there to have been anything significant or personal happening. I don’t really feel comfortable talking about my religious background at all, because I don’t think there’s any way to do it that doesn’t share stuff that’s too personal - essentially religious abuse. Most people don’t even consider that this might be an issue, because they haven’t experienced this sort of thing.
Is it really so varied? I don’t think so. I don’t see how you can join any religion (except one where joining = sneaking in the back anonymously) without talking about your religious background to some appropriate degree.
Edit: I’m really not trying to show off. I guess…the more I hear, the more it sounds like RCIA is tailored to deal with people who are approaching religion flippantly. I can’t understand this mindset - why would you do that? I’ve always had taking religion seriously just be expected. Even as an atheist - people were atheists because they’d done the research and came to the conclusion that atheism was true, not just because they felt like it or didn’t care.
Flippantly. Hmm. In some cases, maybe, but mostly I would say, NO. Emphatically no. People don’t take the time & expense to come down once a week, every week, and participate for 6 months or more, just to be “flippant.” That’s not the motivation that the great majority of people in RCIA have. If people come into the program in the fall with odd attitudes, they usually change pretty quickly or they leave. People do leave RCIA programs occasionally before they get to the end.

I know this first hand. I was an atheist long ago. And I came through RCIA to become Catholic now. I"m also a degreed philosopher with degrees in science also. I’m not just talking out of my hat. There are some problems here that you have to address in a practical way.
 
Your schedule conflict appears to be more important than showing up. That’s a telling bit of information. And, DarkLight, you are not the authority on what’s intrinsic to joining the Church and what’s not. The parish priest and RCIA director of the parish that you choose actually have those jobs, not you.
I’ll be honest - that’s part of what I evaluate when I’m looking at readiness for RCIA candidates. If something else is more important than being at the RCIA class, then maybe the person isn’t quite ready to take on the level of commitment that is required of Catholics in good standing with the Church.

As our Bishop pointed out to us, we already have enough half-hearted Catholics in the Church. Our job in RCIA is to develop committed Catholics who are willing to give 100% of themselves to the Church. So if there is something more important to you than showing up for RCIA, that’s a red flag that tells us that you don’t see your becoming Catholic as being very important to your life.
 
I’ll be honest - that’s part of what I evaluate when I’m looking at readiness for RCIA candidates. If something else is more important than being at the RCIA class, then maybe the person isn’t quite ready to take on the level of commitment that is required of Catholics in good standing with the Church.

As our Bishop pointed out to us, we already have enough half-hearted Catholics in the Church. Our job in RCIA is to develop committed Catholics who are willing to give 100% of themselves to the Church. So if there is something more important to you than showing up for RCIA, that’s a red flag that tells us that you don’t see your becoming Catholic as being very important to your life.
Certainly. This is true for any kind of program one might teach. For instance, I used to be a Lamaze teacher. People who can’t seem to get to classes, because they have reasons to be here or there instead, aren’t really with the program. And they usually aren’t successful at doing Lamaze when crunch time comes. That’s just human psychology. And it’s really all about PRIORITIES. RCIA programs would be amiss if they didn’t take this seriously. The idea of RCIA is to learn to be Catholic, not just to sign up and do a walk-through. Being Catholic has to be PRIORITY #1. There is a lot of commitment to being a Catholic. It’s a choice for life, and as a convert myself, I’m very aware of that.
 
I’m not sure I understand the feeling in this thread that RCIA is a truly necessary step for entring the Church. It wasn’t there in its current form until Vatican II, and AFAIK it wasn’t there at all for centuries. Holy converts such as Bl. John Henry Cardinal Newman didn’t go through it. It’s not required now.
The Rite was given to us by the Vatican; it’s not something that was just come up with by the local Ladies’ Aid. My understanding is that what comes from the Vatican is required to be used; it’s not optional unless they also mention other options.

There are various forms of RCIA, including shortened forms for people already baptized, but the only exemptions would be, someone who is fully Catechized and has been attending Mass and living the Catholic lifestyle for years, or someone coming in from any of the Eastern Churches. These exemptions are mentioned in the Rite itself.
 
The Rite was given to us by the Vatican; it’s not something that was just come up with by the local Ladies’ Aid. My understanding is that what comes from the Vatican is required to be used; it’s not optional unless they also mention other options.

There are various forms of RCIA, including shortened forms for people already baptized, but the only exemptions would be, someone who is fully Catechized and has been attending Mass and living the Catholic lifestyle for years, or someone coming in from any of the Eastern Churches. These exemptions are mentioned in the Rite itself.
It’s not required all the time, but in almost all cases, parishes prefer that people go through it for the very reasons we’re discussing. The fact that it does take some effort and time does tend to filter out people who want to be Catholic on a whim or for the wrong reasons. People still get through it and drop out later, but the mere length and commitment in time does tend to have a reforming or winnowing effect on those few who aren’t very serious at the outset.

A while back, I was also talking here in CAF about the disabled. A lot of parishes have even set up situations where disabled people and very, very poor people, and so on can attend. This is really good. A process is really necessary because of the way that people are constructed psychologically and motivationally.

PS. I have seen cases where someone who’s a prominent biblical scholar in some protestant congregation comes in and he doesn’t go through RCIA because he goes through another process. But he still goes through a process. And of course, the thing there is that it’s usually a very long painful process of discernment for such an individual because it usually means he loses his livelihood and his reputation when he switches. It can be very difficult and things like this are usually undertaken very seriously for obvious reasons.

Some of the Anglican ministers who’ve had congregations already come in under options like these–they attend special classes, basically RCIA, but designed for them. And of course, we are in some degree of union with some of the Eastern Catholic Churches, so coming sideways isn’t as difficult. But people doing that would’ve gone through the processes with their former churches, which in many cases are even more demanding socially and in practical terms. Often there’s also an ethnic component there too.

I’ve also seen deathbed conversions that didn’t require RCIA but then they also have a special character of their own, and the priest is the acting person who discerns such cases.
 
I’ve also seen deathbed conversions that didn’t require RCIA but then they also have a special character of their own, and the priest is the acting person who discerns such cases.
Actually, what happens in these cases is an extremely rapid RCIA process - all of the appropriate Rites are completed in the proper sequence, and all in the same single session, followed by the Anointing of the Sick and the Rites appropriate for the dying, also in the same session.
 
Edit: I’m really not trying to show off. I guess…the more I hear, the more it sounds like RCIA is tailored to deal with people who are approaching religion flippantly.
Flippant??? Really??? You’re not being just a wee bit judgmental, are you?

People don’t need a degree in theology before they start RCIA.

Some are led by the Holy Spirit. They may not be able to describe it fully, but they have a feeling of being “home” when they enter a Catholic Church. They’re drawn to the liturgy and drawn to the sacraments, even if they don’t fully understand them. They feel like they’re being called in this direction.

Some are led by love. Their spouse is Catholic and they want to raise their children as Catholics. They may not understand how the Catholic Church is different from the church where they grew up, but they’re willing to find out. They’re putting themselves on the line because they want their family to be united in faith.

Some are led by the example of friends or family members who are Catholic. Whether or not they can p(name removed by moderator)oint what exactly it is about these people, they know that they want what the Catholics in their lives have.

Whatever it is that draws them, they are committing themselves to the prayer and study it takes to become Catholic. They regularly show up on both Sunday mornings and weekday evening classes for months or even years if that’s what it takes.

You call them flippant. I call them amazingly dedicated and I admire their faith and love of God.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top