T
Tampa_Dave
Guest
51-43 Obama?Nope. Last poll has it 51-43 (IIRC)
Real Clear Politics Poll Predictions 9/23 (Anybody care to prognosticate?)
- Status
R
Rich_Olszewski
Guest
Not older than I, I reckon, and I won’t ask how old, for it’s impolite to ask a lady her age.
I
irishpatrick
Guest
Romney will take at least 52% of the Catholic vote–perhaps as much as 55%.Nope. Last poll has it 51-43 (IIRC)
T
Tampa_Dave
Guest
I’ll tell that to my 96 year-old grandmother and my 76 year-old dad who still works 50 - 60 hours per week. I’m semi-retired at 56 years-old, so I have nothing to complain about. I knew that law school was worth my time and investment!At my age (70), I’m satisfied just to be able to carry on.
D
Dawnia
Guest
and 100% of faithful Catholics
L
Luigi_Daniele
Guest
Again, I agree. Are we related?
I
irishpatrick
Guest
LOL–Again, I agree. Are we related?
T
Tampa_Dave
Guest
*Washington D.C., Sep 18, 2012 / 04:55 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Surveys indicate that the Catholic vote is “too close to call,” a Catholic research center at Georgetown University says. “The vote of Catholics remains quite evenly split: 47 percent for President Obama and 45 percent for Gov. Romney,” the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate said Sept. 17. The statistically tied candidates have rarely topped 50 percent of the Catholic vote. The small percentage of Catholic registered voters will likely decide the winner of the Catholic vote in a country where one in four voters is Catholic. The research center aggregated data from polls that surveyed a Catholic sub-group, including Pew, Gallup and TIPP. Among Protestants, Gov. Romney leads the president by 51 to 40 percent. Those without a religious affiliation largely favor the president, with 63 percent saying they will vote for him and only 27 percent stating they will vote for Romney.
*
Protestants like Romney by 11%, yet Catholics favor Obama by 2%. I find that amazing. Of course, secularists, atheists, and Jewish voters prefer Obama.
*
Protestants like Romney by 11%, yet Catholics favor Obama by 2%. I find that amazing. Of course, secularists, atheists, and Jewish voters prefer Obama.
L
Luigi_Daniele
Guest
I
irishpatrick
Guest
Romney will easily take the Catholic vote. I predict 52-55% of the Catholic vote will go to Romney.
T
Tampa_Dave
Guest
J
JimR-OCDS
Guest
T
Tampa_Dave
Guest
thehill.com/capital-living/in-the-know/258491-madonna-strips-for-obama-offers-profanity-laced-endorsement
*Madonna strips for Obama, offers profanity-laced endorsement
By Emily Goodin - 09/25/12 09:21 AM ET
Madonna offered a profanity-laced endorsement of President Obama at her concert Monday night, which involved the singer stripping down to her underwear to reveal the president’s name written on her body. “You all better vote for f—ing Obama okay,” she told the crowd at Washington’s Verizon center. Later in the show, Madonna took off her shirt and pulled down her pants to show she had “OBAMA” written in all capital letters across her lower back. “When Obama is in the White House for a second term I’ll take it all off,” she said to cheers and whistles from the audience.*
Now there is a fine example of a former Catholic school girl, eh?
*Madonna strips for Obama, offers profanity-laced endorsement
By Emily Goodin - 09/25/12 09:21 AM ET
Madonna offered a profanity-laced endorsement of President Obama at her concert Monday night, which involved the singer stripping down to her underwear to reveal the president’s name written on her body. “You all better vote for f—ing Obama okay,” she told the crowd at Washington’s Verizon center. Later in the show, Madonna took off her shirt and pulled down her pants to show she had “OBAMA” written in all capital letters across her lower back. “When Obama is in the White House for a second term I’ll take it all off,” she said to cheers and whistles from the audience.*
Now there is a fine example of a former Catholic school girl, eh?
Y
Yerusalyim
Guest
Romney wins…GOP retains house…barely takes Senate…the US is saved.
B
bellasbane
Guest
I’m sorry to hear that.
Scott Brown’s latest racial attacks against Elizabeth Warren and his “tomahawk war-whooping” senate aides (whose salaries I unfortunately pay) is all simply disgusting.
He can’t run a straight campaign against her - so he is resorting to lies and racial resentment - not quite the nice guy with the pick-up truck image he’d like to portray.
I’m glad Obama is going to win the most Catholic state in the union by 25-30 points!
R
Rich_Olszewski
Guest
Good for the two of them!! My mother is 96, and she’s in good health, healthier than her four children! Glad that law school worked out for you. As a Yankee in this Southern state, I found that my law degree and licensure in Arkansas and Missouri didn’t do any good except for a position as an attorney for the State.I’ll tell that to my 96 year-old grandmother and my 76 year-old dad who still works 50 - 60 hours per week. I’m semi-retired at 56 years-old, so I have nothing to complain about. I knew that law school was worth my time and investment!
I can’t afford to retire.
J
JimR-OCDS
Guest
bellasbane.
Also, Elizabeth Warren in fact lied all of her life about her Native American heritage, which she has no lineage to.
She also broke the campaign agreement with Brown, to not go negative with their ads.
She also makes $300,000 per year and has a free home at Harvard U. He husband Bruce Mann, also makes a six digit salary at Harvard, so both together, they make over $1 million annually In other words, they’re the 1% that she attacks. It’s also because of salaries like theirs, that tuition cost at Harvard have increased over 19%.
In all this, her justification is that she worked hard to achieve this. Yet, she attacks people in the private sector who also work hard and end up at good paying executive positions in corporations.
She’s a hypocrite.
So blaming him for racism is a false accusation.
Jim
I agree it was disgusting, and could possibly cost Scott Brown the election. But lets be fair here. Brown did not approve this, he wasn’t even there.
Also, Elizabeth Warren in fact lied all of her life about her Native American heritage, which she has no lineage to.
She also broke the campaign agreement with Brown, to not go negative with their ads.
She also makes $300,000 per year and has a free home at Harvard U. He husband Bruce Mann, also makes a six digit salary at Harvard, so both together, they make over $1 million annually In other words, they’re the 1% that she attacks. It’s also because of salaries like theirs, that tuition cost at Harvard have increased over 19%.
In all this, her justification is that she worked hard to achieve this. Yet, she attacks people in the private sector who also work hard and end up at good paying executive positions in corporations.
She’s a hypocrite.
Again. Scott Brown never approved of the acts that his supporters displayed and he wasn’t even their among that crowd. After learning of it, he said he was disgusted.
So blaming him for racism is a false accusation.
Jim
Q
qui_est_ce
Guest
Isn’t this precisely what we teach our kids not to do?thehill.com/capital-living/in-the-know/258491-madonna-strips-for-obama-offers-profanity-laced-endorsement
Madonna strips for Obama, offers profanity-laced endorsement
By Emily Goodin - 09/25/12 09:21 AM ET
Madonna offered a profanity-laced endorsement of President Obama at her concert Monday night, which involved the singer stripping down to her underwear to reveal the president’s name written on her body. “You all better vote for f—ing Obama okay,” she told the crowd at Washington’s Verizon center. Later in the show, Madonna took off her shirt and pulled down her pants to show she had “OBAMA” written in all capital letters across her lower back. “When Obama is in the White House for a second term I’ll take it all off,” she said to cheers and whistles from the audience.
Now there is a fine example of a former Catholic school girl, eh?
How embarrassingly vulgar and classless.
- Status