Rebuttals for same sex marriage PLEASE!

  • Thread starter Thread starter theCardinalbird
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
niceatheist said:
Oh I get it, you only want to read passages in the Bible that allow you to confirm your prejudices
Click to expand...
I don’t have prejudices. Just look at what you are saying. Homosexual actions cannot be logically defended.
niceatheist said:
So you’re saying you should concern yourself with the needle in your brother eye?
Click to expand...
Strawman. That passage is not an excuse to blow with the cultural wind and lay down the guard for scandal.

That line of reason might work on uninformed Protestants, but in Catholicism we revert back to natural law and its philosophic pinnings.

People who defend homosexual actions and so-called gay “marriage” don’t have a prayer on here.
 
What’s already done? They keep wanting more and more. Why is that if it’s done?
 
Thorolfr said:
Are gay Catholics who want their marriages to be blessed an important pressure group inside the Church? They’re probably dwarfed by straight divorced Catholics who want to be able to get remarried with the Church’s blessing. And what about Catholic women who want to be priests? That must be another pressure group. They even have their own website called “Roman Catholic Womenpriests.” 😉
Click to expand...
The views on these things tend to be shared by the same group. There’s no need to divide them.
 
That’s the issue with the enforcement–mandates set up to close Catholic and other Christian agencies/businesses that do not cater to homosexuals… where have you been in the past decade or so… one of the moons of Jupiter?

It is the same argument of the atheists… they don’t ‘believe in God’ yet they continue to spew all sorts of anti-Catholic/God propaganda, religiously!

…at least they don’t pretend that they still want to be in fellowship with Christ!

Maran atha!

Angel
 
I concur!

…and both groups, as much as they want to claim God’s Fellowship, by their own behavior, reject God’s Will!

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Hi, Dave!

…this is the problem; man wants to dictate to God how God must accept him… it’s the Cain phenomenon: ‘Lord, here’s my offering–you must take it because that’s what I want to offer!’

Maran atha!

Angel
 
You have to use the page guide several times (more than 10 or even 20–old system was better on this issue); it sometimes slows down so be ready to spend at least 5 minutes just cursing up and away!

Maran atha!

Angel
 
Pointing out a passage means nothing… Jesus warned: 'you believe in God? You do well; demons believe and tremble!

It is not about pointing out; it is about striving to do God’s Will; if we start from the false precept that God must accept us as we “choose” to be, then no amount of ‘it’s in Scriptures’ will help.

Scriptures themselves warn to be Doers of the Word not just listeners (or as in cases such as yours 'pointers).

Maran atha!

Angel
 
No.

He is saying that two wrongs do not make a right.

Who ever sins is a sinner; whether by sex acts or by other means man rejects God as he chooses himself over God.

The Call is not to fulfill your desires but to please God; as Hebrews 6 tells us: ‘without faith it is impossible to please God.’

We cannot claim to have Faith in God by disobeying His Commandments.

Play atheist; play homosexual; play heterosexual; play fluid whatever… God has Decreed that nothing impure will enter Heaven–yeah, all sin is impurity (unrighteousness).

Maran atha!

Angel
 
So why are you insisting, in a Catholic site, that it is done?

I don’t like sports (yeah, nor oreos cookies) but I don’t go around forcing others to accept my understanding of such as the “correct” or “right” way. It is my personal preference.

However, no one, not even the most bleeding-of-hearts “Christian” can claim unrighteousness as righteous and just another “choice” in serving Yahweh God.

Maran atha!

Angel
 
SuperLuigi said:
What’s already done? They keep wanting more and more. Why is that if it’s done?
Click to expand...
If by “more and more”, you mean equality before the law, then sure, why not? Is there some reason you think homosexuals are inferior, and deserve inferior protections/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top