T
Tsuwano
Guest
Which “quasi-legal system that appeared focused on nothing but violent revenge” are you refering to?The post-war trials and executions aren’t exactly a shining part of history. The Soviets, Chinese, French, Americans, and Commonwealth leaders killed a whole lot of people. Some instances were high-profile kangaroo courts against Nazi leaders. Other instances involved people never making it to trial, being summarily shot or tossed into Displaced Persons camps to be killed by mobs. There was no real accountability or valid jurisprudence in place to ensure the rights of the accused.
Plenty of people of good conscience from the winning side of the war objected to the institution of “victor’s justice” that violated all previous international standards of jurisprudence, men like U.S. Senator Robert Taft. The fact that they tried to get Oscar Schindler and could have easily have hanged him for slave-labor and munitions production should show us that these reservations were prudent.
There’s no moral obligation to hand over suspects to a quasi-legal-system that appeared focused on nothing but violent revenge, no matter how much one loathes the accused.
- Marty Lund