the highligted is more the train ofthought i have. we can be guilty of others sins as well, if we cause them to sin. …
ex…a recovering sex addict either sex] is walking down the street, and a scantily clad person the sex the first one is attracted to] appears and the sex addict is immediately overwhelmed with tempation…try as he/she might, but later that day , they abuse themselves…that sin woudl also lay on the shoulders of the scantily clad person.
my “big picture” being… were are always doing one of two things: either we are leading people to Christ…or we are leading people away from Christ…there is no inbetween, no fence to ride on, no gray area.
how do you feel abou that?
Actually, you’ve got a good point…as long as you consider this: The scantily clad person has every reason to blame themselves…but the sex addict can only blame self as well. In other words, we can blame
ourselves for others’ sins (which actually fits into the grand scheme of not making excuses for ourselves) but we should not blame
others for
our sins. The sex addict, for instance, will never get any better if he/she thinks he/she can lay the blame elsewhere. Even if the blame belongs elsewhere. I suppose a third party, who’s balanced,
can logically say that
both sides are to blame. So if I know a scantily clad person has tempted someone successfully, I can truly say that both people were to blame. In advising both people, if given the chance, I can say that
both are sinning,
both have a responsability to
each other and that
both should stop their ways…in any case, I must keep it balanced, in a
normal case. However, from the inside POV, each person should blame only themselves for their own sin, and maybe for the sin of the other, but never the other for their own sin. A man, for instance, might approach a woman who seduced him earlier, and tell her of the error of her ways for
her sake, but must refrain from saying “If not for
you,
I’d not have sinned.” This may or may not be true…but the human desire to place blame “somewhere besides me” is too great to start making excuses.
A
third party, keep in mind, might (in concerned Christian love) suggest “Is it not possible that he
might not have sinned without your influence?” The same person, though, would have to suggest to the man “Is it not possible that you
might have provided her a good example instead of joining her in her sin?” As you can see, that third party would have to be balanced so as not to start taking sides, but to rather just point out the realistic way in which each might honestly bear responsability for the other. I imagine a Priest would have such experience, though I can’t say for sure. (Keep in mind, the genders here could easily be flipped around…it’s about the situation, not the genders fulfilling the roles)
In short, if everyone blamed themselves for their own sins, and even (when indeed appropriate) for the sins of others, the world would by default be a better place as people took more responsability for their actions and the damage done to others…if, on the other hand, people blamed others for their sins, the world might slip into even further moral decay because of the lack of self-responsability.