Site claims Eastwood is the “mystery speaker”
You are a real partisan, Liza. No attempt at fairness and that’s a real hoot. In the previous post, you dump on the Democrats with real invective, and in this post you endow the GOP hopefuls with heavenlike qualities. We’ll just have to wait a few months to see if your opinion will be validated or tossed into the dustbin.
What will I do if Obama is re-elected? Weep for the unborn. You are right - I am bitter that there are still catholics who would vote for such a man - in light of his pro-abortion policies.
Rich since you have bragged about your ignorance of the candidates I mentioned, you are hardly an authority about their qualities or lack thereof. As I said repeatedly, these people are not unfamiliar to me since I heard them long before they hit the public stage. I’ve watched and listened and I am impressed.You are a real partisan, Liza. No attempt at fairness and that’s a real hoot. In the previous post, you dump on the Democrats with real invective, and in this post you endow the GOP hopefuls with heavenlike qualities. We’ll just have to wait a few months to see if your opinion will be validated or tossed into the dustbin.
Cory Booker is a great credit to himself, his family and the city of Newark. He is in affliation a Democrat. That said, to anyone familiar with his record, it is no surprise that he is not more prominently featured in Democrat circles, although he is to speak at the Convention.
You are a broken record, Cmatt. Which policy is more compassionate? GOP plan of reforming the entitlements so they are saved for those who want/need them or Democrat plan of driving over the fiscal cliff and endangering their existence. Cmatt - Democrat policy of tax the rich, spend, tax, spend, tax, spend, create more dependency and despair is not compasssionate, its destructive. Chris Christie, whether you like him or not, tells it like it is. He, Ryan and Romney are being honest about the situation we’re in. The Democrats are the ones ignoringn the problem - no budget from Obama in how many years?
I offer you successful governors and senators being touted for vice president and you offer… Patty Murry? She was the one who said, “Osama bin Laden has the support of the people because he built day care centers for the poor and we have not been doing that.” She is an embarassment to the senate (and the state of washington) and the fact that you offer her - and Kathleen Sebelius, the catholic partnering with Obama on his attack on religious freedom - shows that you have no real bright, fresh young leaders with new ideas - just Obama, Biden, the Clintons and a bunch of party hacks.But if you insist on names, Ishii, there are too many within the Democratic Party to list all of them but I’ll give you some names if that will make you happy.
There is a current Sec of St who if she chose to run could be elected POTUS in 2016. There is Deval Patrick, an African American, who like your current RNC nominee did, is serving as governor of Mass. The chair of the DNC is a Jewish female Congresswoman. Serving under President Obama in other Cabinet positions besides Sec of St Clinton has been Sec of Labor Hilda Solis, former AZ governor Janet Napolitano has led Homeland Secuirty, former Kansas governor Kathleen Sebelius HHS. And there are many Democratic female Senators. I won’t list all of them either. But to just give you some names. Kirsten Gillibrand, Jeanne Shaheen, Amy Klobuchar. Maria Cantwell, your own Patty Murray. Perhaps further down the road, I’ve been impressed with California’s Attn Gen, Kamala Harris in interviews I’ve seen her do on MSNBC. I could see her having a bright future in national Democratic Party politics if she should so choose to pursue a national career. She happens to be both African American and female.
their policies create more poor - compassionate indeed.
They’ll know she’s real when she appears on Dancing with the Stars.
So how do you explain the abortion rate declining significantly under the Clinton administration?
She’s a real partisan?You are a real partisan, Liza. No attempt at fairness and that’s a real hoot. In the previous post, you dump on the Democrats with real invective, and in this post you endow the GOP hopefuls with heavenlike qualities. We’ll just have to wait a few months to see if your opinion will be validated or tossed into the dustbin.
He is an effective speaker, no doubt. And he seems to have no trouble appealing to both the Ayn Randist (atheists, self-servers, abortionists, etc.) and the anti-Ayn Randist (evangelicals, etc,) Not too many people who can do that.
He is great, isn’t he? Can’t wait to see him in the 1st position!
The desperation will become obvious when they try to wiggle out of the “Too Big To Fail” corporatism they helped set up during the Clinton-Bush administrations.
I don’t have to know how to play the piano to be able to give a valid opinion on the talent of the pianist. BTW, your use of “bragged” is hyperbole.
Your being impressed is an appropriate and educated reaction. Will that, though, translate into their being elected and helping to sweep the accursed Democrats out of Congress?
First, where in the Forum rules does it say that one must be wholly familiar with a candidate for office before being alllowed to comment on that individual?
Fine. I thought that you were going to point to some inner-city crook as an ideal Democrat, but you didn’t, and pointed to a man who is willing to some extent to stand up to his party as when he criticized its attacks on Mitt Romney’s private equity career. Obama strategist David Axelrod had fired back that Booker was “wrong” for calling the attacks on Romney’s Bain Capital tenure “nauseating.” Good for Booker!
Got a long wait - until 2020!
You doubt it? Read Post #599.She’s a real partisan?
Calling the election for Romney already? I thought you were a Dem.
There’s a well-deserved gotcha! I realized that one could come to that conclusion AFTER I had hit ENTER!Calling the election for Romney already? I thought you were a Dem.
Actually, the RATE didn’t decline very much during the Clinton years, and declined much more during the Bush years. It was certainly much higher than it was before Roe.
Then it shows how much people value their vote, that they won’t cough up a measly 45 cents? How much is your vote worth to you? To me, I’d gladly pay the 45 cents because over a billion people do not have this right.
:bounce::yup: