Responding to my friend

  • Thread starter Thread starter kevlarkyogre
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
. . . I am just open to the evidence I can see. . .
I know I am thinking and understanding what I write.
No idea how that works, but it’s what I do and it is pretty amazing.
Perceptually speaking, the reality of one’s visual, auditory, gustatory, tactile world(s), is not so much seen as it is that by which one knows the world and the nature of oneself in relation to it.
Most of what I know is realized or revealed rather than proven.
I use proofs more to manipulate things, never to enter into relation.
You are likely just debating. The world of mere intellectual connection is pretty weird - no hugs and kisses - just ideas, suspicions, out there, never to be touched.
 
Lewis is generally considered to be a brilliant mind. He’s not everyone’s cup of tea of course.
Unlike Chesterton, he had not the insight to cross the Rubicon into the Catholic Church.

Though he had been invited to cross it.
 
Unlike Chesterton, he had not the insight to cross the Rubicon into the Catholic Church.

Though he had been invited to cross it.
Yes it’s true he did not join the Catholic Church.

One of the reasons he speaks so lucidly about the existence of God is that he was atheist at one time and knows the pathways to there and back again. 😉
 
No, but we experience them. Our own, for starters, and we do see evidence that others exist.
You **believe you experience them and you believe others exist but you cannot prove **it. You take it for granted - like good or evil, right or wrong, just or unjust, true or false, innocent or guilty, responsible or irresponsible, valuable or valueless, purposeful or purposeless and meaningful or meaningless - even though you could be dreaming…

Our sole certainty is the fact that we are thinking. We infer the existence of everything and everyone else. **Intangible reality **is our primary datum.
 
You **believe you experience them and you believe others exist but you cannot prove **it. You take it for granted - like good or evil, right or wrong, just or unjust, true or false, innocent or guilty, responsible or irresponsible, valuable or valueless, purposeful or purposeless and meaningful or meaningless - even though you could be dreaming…

Our sole certainty is the fact that we are thinking. We infer the existence of everything and everyone else. **Intangible reality **is our primary datum.
I don’t need proof to believe in something, just compelling evidence.
 
I think if God wants me to believe, then he’d better start compelling.

I
In your experience, have you ever had a relationship that worked this way, where one person forces the other to have a relationship with them?
 
In your experience, have you ever had a relationship that worked this way, where one person forces the other to have a relationship with them?
Force may be too strong of a word, but I have had something similar in which a person stands in my pathway and won’t let me continue until I have a conversation. This is repeated over time. I can think of two people that have done this with me. that was about 13-15 years ago. We are still good friends today.

Sometimes that strategy works.

Parson my mistakes. Sent from my mobile device.
 
DrTaffy;12853379:
Should I just assume that every hypothetical possible person in that room exists but is keeping quiet? Just how many Gods do you believe in?
One God only.
So you do not believe in every possible God. QED.

Nor do you you address how an omnipotent omniscient God might be ‘unable’ to find me.🤷
 
So you do not believe in every possible God. QED.

Nor do you you address how an omnipotent omniscient God might be ‘unable’ to find me.🤷
An omniscient and omnipotent being would have no trouble finding you. 🤷

If you find someone and love them, are they required to find you back?
By your reasoning, the mere fact that you desire a relationship with someone means they are required to love you back.
If you had the power make someone love you, would you exercise it?

Would the fact that you don’t exercise your power mean that you don’t have it?
Or is there a difference between the ability to do something and using (mis-using) it.
I have the power to lock my wife in the house when I want relations.
Should I do it?
 
So you do not believe in every possible God. QED.

Nor do you you address how an omnipotent omniscient God might be ‘unable’ to find me.🤷
God is very able to find you.

You might not think you are able to find God.

God does not force himself on anyone by compulsion.

We force him out of our lives by compulsion.

So he leaves, but still hangs around in case we change our minds. 👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top