T
Tantum_ergo
Guest
I hope this comes across properly–believe me, I don’t mean to be uncharitable in the least–but. . .Exactly. Much more conservative. My family joined our current parish (dh was raised Catholic) a few years ago. They have over 2000 members, but they saw I was in media and called me the very next day and asked me to join to committees. I did, I like to be involved. I also said I would like to take the RCIA classes. They were almost over (this was February) and they had me start attending right then and I was confirmed that April. Then I started realizing that everything wasn’t discussed in those classes. I don’t know–seemed very bait and switch to me.
Judi. . .’'much more conservative"? Homosexual actions are condemned by the Catholic Church. Sin is condemned by the Catholic Church. You can’t get much more conservative than that!
The Catholic Church has many members. Anytime you have a ‘lot’ of people, you are going to get the gamut from people who ‘follow the rules completely’ to ‘those who ignore them’.
What you’re going to get in a ‘smaller, more conservative group’ is people who (because they are smaller in numbers) can be more ‘self-policing’ in certain areas, who go for a lot of the externals (plain dress, probably, perhaps no TV, certainly a stricter ‘BIBLE’ followin’ claim’.
You know what? You can get that in the Catholic Church, too. Google "plain Catholics’.
If you haven’t read C.S. Lewis, I’d recommend him (and he’s a Protestant author, not a Catholic, I’m just saying). In one of his works (possibly the Screwtape Letters) he points out that quite often “newer” Christians get so caught up with shock at the “unChristian” behavior of the “person in the pew next to them” that they fail to realize that they are no better themselves. IOW, for all the ‘shock’ that a person might feel in seeing the sins of the Catholics ‘next to them’, they seldom realize that they themselves might be causing ‘shock’ to Catholics for whom they are the “person in the pew next. . .”
Tight-lipped censoriousness, holier-than-thouism (and believe me, I’m guilty of this myself, I know), and a constant search to find the church full of the ‘godliest’ people because heck, if you’re godly yourself, that’s the kind of people you deserve to be with, you know, not those awful sinners. . .well, those don’t seem like the best reasons to walk away from a faith that you freely accepted not that long ago.
The fact that you’re now (IMO) jumping to criticize the people who confirmed you, implying it was ‘too fast’, and that it was ‘bait and switch’ seem like feeble efforts to justify yourself. . .and that really isn’t (again IMO) the right frame of mind in which to seek truth, because you’re liable to be blinded by the need to make yourself feel good, look good, and again ‘justify yourself’ for leaving.
I think you were right the first time in coming to the Church, and I do question why it’s what, 3 years on, and suddenly people in a protestant church make a fuss over you and you want to be with them? Is it the TRUTH you’re seeking, or it is the ego gratification of being sought? A few years from now when the people in the new church turn out to be the same old ‘hypocrits and sinners’ you’re seeing in your soon-to-be discarded church, will you be off to the next group who ‘seek you’ and make you feel 'welcome?"
I’m NOT saying this to be mean. It’s just that your own posts point out that you ‘want to be needed’ and ‘love to be loved’. . .and your own history of changing ‘once’ (and perhaps as you dimly sense changing more out of a sense of wanting ‘fellowship’ and feeling ‘wanted’ yourself) does not auger all that well if you’re changing now for the same type of reason. . .