Robert Spencer on Magdi Allam's story

  • Thread starter Thread starter arabic_catholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Agree Robwar, but the dream was significant, never having anything like it and it came years before 9/11.

As I shared, there is a branch of Islam that goes across the board who are like us and they share same footing with us. The fact that they are rising up – an action that threatens their own existence, is exemplary as well.

We have to be very careful not to invalidate people who are speaking the truth and identifying the source of the problems, that can bring great death and destruction to mankind.

Sometimes I think WWIII will be started by some Muslim fanatic with nukes in his backpack. They are already here.

I was listening to a radio commentary program about American intelligence agents, and when they went to proper authorities to reveal dangerous activity by 5th column, hidden, Muslim intelligence in our country, they were rebuked and put out.

There is something rotten in all of this when you cannot name the enemy at the expense of millions of innocent lives.

We cannot never compromise with evil, or else it will get the greater hand. Recently in my state a whistle blower lost their job.
 
You lose me here as I do not know all Bishops are saying, “Islam is great.” If that is true then there must be a directive from the Vatican that says so and as far as I know there is certainly none.
I am not saying all of them , but take for example Bishop McManus who stopped Spencer from speaking to catholics. or the archbishop of Milan who works hard to ease the life of the islamic community in Milan ! indeed the bishops in Europe are easing islamic illegal immigration . Rather than forcing islamic religious leaders to denounce saudi arabia publicly for not allowing churches to be build , we are seeing praises of islam !
As far as I know, Islam does not have structured hierarchy unlike Catholicism. The question is, who therefore are representing Islam? The most we can do would be to get those clerics who have official position in their government. I am not too sure if the Church is doing that. Obviously a radical would not fit in this category.
Ah, you are right there. No Hans Kung to represent Catholics. But would the Saudi grant Mufti, or the Saudi government rather, consented to participate in the dialogue? They seem to be very elitist and not much that we can get out of them. As far as I know such dialogues are on who is willing basis.
exactly , that is my whole point ! the Saudi grand mufti , Yusuf al qardawi , are all bunch of radicals . no doubt about it, but they are representing a huge section , of not the majority, of Sunni Islam. most islamic orginizaton in the west are tied to saudi funding . The Vatican should dialogue with the Real guys , not the pussycats. you will say " but they are not willing to dialogue " well , then you are admitting that they are people from the bronze age , so stop speaking of islam in high language , and treat it as it is.you don’t dialogue with Nazis to find a common ground , you tell them your practices ought to be change.
In the first place it is not for the Church to tell Muslims what to believe. So that would be out of the question. The most they can do is to voice their disagreement.
This is the problem . The church treats islam as of it is a developed religion . Islam is medieval in all sense, and the doctrines and laws were lied down by their “church fathers” in that period. so the church ought to know what muslims “really” believe. Why modern islam of the early 20th century disappeared ? why egypt became more radicalized ?why revival of classical islam (which is radical) happened ? because all attempt to reinterpret islam will hit their classical interpretation( which is built on the sayings of muhammad himself) . it’s like hoping that catholics will denounce the doctrine of the real presence , despite the fact that Ignatius of Antioch , and Justin martyr wrote about it. likewise , you can’t hope muslims will give up doctirnes such as Jihad , that were understood from the beginning to be like that .
Pope Benedict VI once did that and what was the result? It was in the negative, right? Not to mention how our religious were killed because of the simple statement. This is not to say that our clergies should avoid saying the truth but more so to say that would probably achieve a more positive outcome, and that is not an easy thing to do.
So , if islam is peace , why would they kill people or commit violence because pope statment ? and if violence is merely a minority position , why most muslims in the world got angry ? it is what you wrote that prove my point , that islam is barbaric religion . So people should stop saying it is nice religion and deceiving other fellow catholics ! or stopping people like spencer from speaking to other catholics about islam

my point is clear sir , if you think islam is evil , and saying that publicly would make violence , then don’t say it is “peaceful” , just be silent about it ; at least. yet this is exactly what the bishops , in the case of Spencer case, didn’t do !
Thanks for the statement on the Islamic four schools and that we should differentiate Islam and Muslims. In any case, I think it is a gross exaggeration that Bishops are that ignorant about Islam.
they are . If muslims who don’t speak arabic don’t even know that muhammad did that or said this, and they are surprised when I give them Islamic sources which prove my point, then what about our bishops ? do you really think the church is training its bishops and priest to understand islam ? I know that public schools in saudi trained us muslims to reject Christianity , but from what I know , the answer is no. Indeed , it would not surprise me if I see bishops who silent their priests and laity for criticizing islam !
 
1/2
I am not saying all of them , but take for example Bishop McManus who stopped Spencer from speaking to catholics. or the archbishop of Milan who works hard to ease the life of the islamic community in Milan ! indeed the bishops in Europe are easing islamic illegal immigration . Rather than forcing islamic religious leaders to denounce saudi arabia publicly for not allowing churches to be build , we are seeing praises of islam !
I have read this post and I am trying to understand your position. I empathize with your thought though I cannot say you are correct in all your assessment of what the Church is doing. I mean not all of it.

I would need more information as to why Bishop Mcmanus stopped Spencer from speaking to Catholics. Did Spencer feed hatred to Catholic about Islam; did he misrepresent Catholic’s teaching on Islam? I am not sure about that, you can tell me.

As for the Bishops of Europe ‘easing Islamic illegal immigration’, I think that on humanitarian ground. Some of these Muslims are refugees, escaping the repressive government in their homeland and some are due to wars that are raging on there. They just happened to be Muslims. What about if these are Christians? Would they be treaded any different? Don’t get me wrong, I am against illegals but yet Christianity is famous for shielding the down-troddens.

I also against praising the Saudi government for restricting Christians’ practice and freedom of religion there. However, I am sure if the Vatican has diplomatic relation with the Saudis, those objection would be more effective done through diplomatic channel without having the other guys to lose face. I have given the example of China. The Vatican does not recognize them and what did they do? They reciprocate and ban Catholic religion and missionaries. Instead they appoint their own Catholics priests and bishops. Our Catholics brethren in China have to go underground and some priests are jailed and no new priests allowed. So, there is only so much that the Vatican can do. Some action could only make it worse for Catholics in those countries.
exactly , that is my whole point ! the Saudi grand mufti , Yusuf al qardawi , are all bunch of radicals . no doubt about it, but they are representing a huge section , of not the majority, of Sunni Islam. most islamic orginizaton in the west are tied to saudi funding . The Vatican should dialogue with the Real guys , not the pussycats. you will say " but they are not willing to dialogue " well , then you are admitting that they are people from the bronze age , so stop speaking of islam in high language , and treat it as it is.you don’t dialogue with Nazis to find a common ground , you tell them your practices ought to be change.
Didn’t you remind me of the differentiation between Islam and Muslims? We do not agree with Islam, that is for sure. But there are ‘good Muslims’ and ‘bad Muslims’. International relation is probably more complicated than we would want it to. There is some goodness about Islam but there is much that we do not agree with them too.

What you said about speaking in ‘high language’ of Islam is simply respect, which is two ways. When Pope JPII died, there were Muslim clerics attending his requiem mass. He was admired and respected by many Muslims. Getting our message across would be more effective if we are on cordial term with them despite our difference. It is like getting the best out of them.

I concede that there are two thoughts on this, since you are equating the Nazis. For that, the action of the Vatican must be wise and appropriate for different situation as they are not always the same which is depending on the practical reality. No two situations are the same and our action may require discretion sometimes; the objective however is the same.
This is the problem . The church treats islam as of it is a developed religion . Islam is medieval in all sense, and the doctrines and laws were lied down by their “church fathers” in that period. so the church ought to know what muslims “really” believe. Why modern islam of the early 20th century disappeared ? why egypt became more radicalized ?why revival of classical islam (which is radical) happened ? because all attempt to reinterpret islam will hit their classical interpretation( which is built on the sayings of muhammad himself) . it’s like hoping that catholics will denounce the doctrine of the real presence , despite the fact that Ignatius of Antioch , and Justin martyr wrote about it. likewise , you can’t hope muslims will give up doctirnes such as Jihad , that were understood from the beginning to be like that .
I know a Priest, Fr. Pacwa who is an expert in Islam – been to his lectures and read his books. The last thing that we should do would be to insult their religion because that would mean insulting them. You should know that. We cannot change Islam; they will not listen to us. Yes, they do Jihad and what can we do about it? This is for the country security force to deal with. Christianity still needs to send the message of love because that is our core message. Unfortunately Islam has grown into a world religion and like how we treat the other religions (see CCC) we do too to Islam without agreeing with them or going into syncretyism.
 
2/2
So , if islam is peace , why would they kill people or commit violence because pope statment ? and if violence is merely a minority position , why most muslims in the world got angry ? it is what you wrote that prove my point , that islam is barbaric religion . So people should stop saying it is nice religion and deceiving other fellow catholics ! or stopping people like spencer from speaking to other catholics about islam
I would not say that Islam is peace and as I said the last Pope was on record lecturing that was not so centuries back. So where does the Church saying that Islam is peace coming from? As for Spencer, maybe we have to find out the reason why he is being objected too.

I am quite surprised that Catholics should praise Islam or condoning the atrocities that Muslims commit. Why would we do that? Catholic’s position on Islam is the most clear-cut in all Christianity because we even put it in writing. Anything more than what the CCC says has to be a deviation.

Now you are saying Islam is a barbaric religion. I would not disagree with that in my heart because I do not believe in Islam anyway. But try saying to a Muslim, “Your prophet is a false prophet. Your holy scripture is a figment of your false prophet’s hallucination. Your angel is a demon and your god is actually Satan himself,” because that may be what you believe about Islam. Would you think that is a correct approach? Fr. Pacwa, an expert in Islam thinks it is not. You only insult him, make him angry or turn him into violence but most of all, that would be the end of any future meaningful dialogue. You cannot get your message across if the person at the other end does not want to talk and listen to you.
my point is clear sir , if you think islam is evil , and saying that publicly would make violence , then don’t say it is “peaceful” , just be silent about it ; at least. yet this is exactly what the bishops , in the case of Spencer case, didn’t do !
Ok then. I disagree saying that Islam is peaceful. There are good teachings in Islam but I would not go to the extent declaring it is peaceful as I would not declare that it is violent unless if I have to make a thesis of it. Why do Catholics have to make that statement anyway? Anyone who says so is saying it unnecessarily. You are right there. I would not make any comment on Spencer until I know better what he stands for.
they are . If muslims who don’t speak arabic don’t even know that muhammad did that or said this, and they are surprised when I give them Islamic sources which prove my point, then what about our bishops ? do you really think the church is training its bishops and priest to understand islam ? I know that public schools in saudi trained us muslims to reject Christianity , but from what I know , the answer is no. Indeed , it would not surprise me if I see bishops who silent their priests and laity for criticizing islam !
I am pretty sure the Bishops know about the non-acceptance of Mohammad as a prophet. I don’t know about the training but information on Islam is available in the Vatican. If it is to be taught in the CCC, such knowledge should be available to our Bishops. If what you tell me is true, it would be exceptional Bishops who would hold on to that view.

As for criticizing Islam, the thing is, why the obsession? What about our core messages? There is so much about Christianity, teachings and doctrines and about being holy. What about being well-catechized? Christianity is not about Islam, that is what I am trying to say. I disagree with Mr. Allam’s reason for leaving the Church. If he is really deep in the Catholic faith he would not be leaving. The Church’s treatment of Islam is not reason for leaving.
 
Reuben,
have you ever read any of Robert Spencer’s books? I have and read just about all of them and there is not “hatred” for Islam or Muslims but a very well researched books which use Islamic sources themselves and quotes them as well as accurate research in history. He accurately reports what Islam really teaches not the puff pieces we are handed as the so called “peaceful” stuff. Robert Spencer is fluent in Arabic and that is key when one is reading the Koran and the hadiths since that is what one is suppose to read the Koran in, not in one’s vernacular language. I don’t know if you saw the thread but it has been reported by Fox News that one of the major Mosques in Egypt now has a dedicated room when they drag in Coptic Christians to beat them. In case you missed the beaten to a pulp man, take a good look at that him and realize there is no dialogue with people like that. Speaking the truth of what really goes on or what is taught and practiced is not hate and it is deception and hate to sweep this stuff under the carpet in the name of tolerance. Likewise, Arabic Catholic is a convert from Islam, I think he would know very much what he is talking about and likewise realize that that anyone who leaves Islam has a death sentence on them. That is in the Koran. We need to listen to Arabic Catholic and what he is saying instead of blowing him off.
 
I can understand why, its hard to reconcile Catholic claims that they worship the same God as Muslims, with the facts of their respective Theology.
 
I can understand why, its hard to reconcile Catholic claims that they worship the same God as Muslims, with the facts of their respective Theology.
Is there anywhere Magdi informs that only after he read the Catechism (which I think he should have before deciding on becoming Catholic) he realized he made a mistake?:hmmm:

MJ
 
Reuben,
have you ever read any of Robert Spencer’s books? I have and read just about all of them and there is not “hatred” for Islam or Muslims but a very well researched books which use Islamic sources themselves and quotes them as well as accurate research in history. He accurately reports what Islam really teaches not the puff pieces we are handed as the so called “peaceful” stuff. Robert Spencer is fluent in Arabic and that is key when one is reading the Koran and the hadiths since that is what one is suppose to read the Koran in, not in one’s vernacular language. I don’t know if you saw the thread but it has been reported by Fox News that one of the major Mosques in Egypt now has a dedicated room when they drag in Coptic Christians to beat them. In case you missed the beaten to a pulp man, take a good look at that him and realize there is no dialogue with people like that. Speaking the truth of what really goes on or what is taught and practiced is not hate and it is deception and hate to sweep this stuff under the carpet in the name of tolerance. Likewise, Arabic Catholic is a convert from Islam, I think he would know very much what he is talking about and likewise realize that that anyone who leaves Islam has a death sentence on them. That is in the Koran. We need to listen to Arabic Catholic and what he is saying instead of blowing him off.
Frankly I have not and I am sure such books are helpful for apologetics and counter against Islam. I am also against violence by Muslims. I am also against the restriction of Christianity in Muslim countries which is quite prevalent. I am also against Islam in a sense that I do not agree with it. I have done quite a bit, in real life, debating against Muslims. I have many Muslim friends and colleagues and some of these arguments are done in a rather objective ways. I have seen how certain Muslims behave badly against Christians and Christians’ material. I do not want you to have the impression that I support Islam. No, far from it.

I have some books from the like of Mark Gabriel. I should get a copy of some of Spencer’ work too. My only question is why that is so important but in any case knowledge should always justify it.

I just goggled Spencer. Yes, he is an expert in Islam. I also note that he heads an organization "Stop Islamization of America", a trademark which unfortunately for him denied by the US Patent and Trademark Office as it deemed to disparage all of Muslim as terrorists. Spencer’s work has been criticized as showing “entrenched hostility” towards Islam, and condemned as hate speech by a number of Muslim-American and civil rights groups. He also said, "It’s fun,” when asked if he was being deliberately combative and provocative by the Washington Post. He is quite controversial though.

As I said, I don’t believe being combative let alone provocative, is a good way to evangelize Muslims. It has to be more refined than that. I also don’t believe that Muslims and their government will care so much about what we say. In other word, confrontation does not achieve much. Does an average Catholic knows how much the Vatican works in support of Christians in Islamic countries and especially in Sudan? We don’t see our leaders disparaging Islam but probably they are more effective in doing thing for the good of Christians compared to the brashness of Spencer.

It is true that speaking the truth does not have to be hate but we have to be careful that in doing so we are not showing the trait of Christian’s love too. That is what I am saying.

You can reread my posts if I am blowing off Arabic Christian just for the sake of it. But as Catholics, if we want to remain one, we have to be faithful to her teaching. We do not want to be like Mr. Allam, do we?
 
Is there anywhere Magdi informs that only after he read the Catechism (which I think he should have before deciding on becoming Catholic) he realized he made a mistake?:hmmm:

MJ
I don’t know, Is everything in the catecheism absolute doctrine which one must adhere to? What do you think of Saint John Damscene’s opinion on islam?
 
I don’t know, Is everything in the catecheism absolute doctrine which one must adhere to? What do you think of Saint John Damscene’s opinion on islam?
As good Catholics, they should use the Catechism as guideline about Catholic faith.🙂

There is only one paragraph about Catholic view of Islam and that is CCC #841. It has been made a big deal by non-Catholics, especially the Evangelicals who want a strong position on Islam. In a nutshell the CCC teaching is simply an exhortation to respect Muslims and their religion. It is not about agreeing with them.
 
As good Catholics, they should use the Catechism as guideline about Catholic faith.🙂

There is only one paragraph about Catholic view of Islam and that is CCC #841. It has been made a big deal by non-Catholics, especially the Evangelicals who want a strong position on Islam. In a nutshell the CCC teaching is simply an exhortation to respect Muslims and their religion. It is not about agreeing with them.
But can a catholic reasonably dissagree with this part of the catechism? Certaintly within History this was not the position of the church to recognise the God of Islam as the God of Christianity. I again point to John Chrysostom and the harsh things he says about Islam and Muhammad.

I think its a reasonable criticism of the roman catholic church.
 
Frankly I have not and I am sure such books are helpful for apologetics and counter against Islam. I am also against violence by Muslims. I am also against the restriction of Christianity in Muslim countries which is quite prevalent. I am also against Islam in a sense that I do not agree with it. I have done quite a bit, in real life, debating against Muslims. I have many Muslim friends and colleagues and some of these arguments are done in a rather objective ways. I have seen how certain Muslims behave badly against Christians and Christians’ material. I do not want you to have the impression that I support Islam. No, far from it.

I have some books from the like of Mark Gabriel. I should get a copy of some of Spencer’ work too. My only question is why that is so important but in any case knowledge should always justify it.

I just goggled Spencer. Yes, he is an expert in Islam. I also note that he heads an organization "Stop Islamization of America", a trademark which unfortunately for him denied by the US Patent and Trademark Office as it deemed to disparage all of Muslim as terrorists. Spencer’s work has been criticized as showing “entrenched hostility” towards Islam, and condemned as hate speech by a number of Muslim-American and civil rights groups. He also said, "It’s fun,” when asked if he was being deliberately combative and provocative by the Washington Post. He is quite controversial though.

As I said, I don’t believe being combative let alone provocative, is a good way to evangelize Muslims. It has to be more refined than that. I also don’t believe that Muslims and their government will care so much about what we say. In other word, confrontation does not achieve much. Does an average Catholic knows how much the Vatican works in support of Christians in Islamic countries and especially in Sudan? We don’t see our leaders disparaging Islam but probably they are more effective in doing thing for the good of Christians compared to the brashness of Spencer.

It is true that speaking the truth does not have to be hate but we have to be careful that in doing so we are not showing the trait of Christian’s love too. That is what I am saying.

You can reread my posts if I am blowing off Arabic Christian just for the sake of it. But as Catholics, if we want to remain one, we have to be faithful to her teaching. We do not want to be like Mr. Allam, do we?
I honestly think you should read him with an open mind and when you do, there is no hatred at all but a bunch of very well researched work which comes from Islamic sources themselves and the best schools in Islam. The is nothing brash in his writings, that is a false criticism.
 
I honestly think you should read him with an open mind and when you do, there is no hatred at all but a bunch of very well researched work which comes from Islamic sources themselves and the best schools in Islam. The is nothing brash in his writings, that is a false criticism.
Ok noted, rob. 🙂
 
But can a catholic reasonably dissagree with this part of the catechism? Certaintly within History this was not the position of the church to recognise the God of Islam as the God of Christianity. I again point to John Chrysostom and the harsh things he says about Islam and Muhammad.

I think its a reasonable criticism of the roman catholic church.
St. John Chrysostom is a Catholic saint too and the quotes he had for Islam and Mohammad do not necessarily in conflict with the spirit of CCC 841. 841 merely saying what Islam claims to believe. If we look at the purpose of CCC, it is not just about catechizing Catholics but also forming them in Christian behavior which is equally important.

Can Catholics disagree with the CCC? My answer is they should not. We listen to the Pope, we listen to the Bishops and priests because they are our shepherds and because we love them. Is CCC 841 is in error? It is probably not if viewed from the concept that I mentioned above.
 
St. John Chrysostom is a Catholic saint too and the quotes he had for Islam and Mohammad do not necessarily in conflict with the spirit of CCC 841. 841 merely saying what Islam claims to believe. If we look at the purpose of CCC, it is not just about catechizing Catholics but also forming them in Christian behavior which is equally important.

Can Catholics disagree with the CCC? My answer is they should not. We listen to the Pope, we listen to the Bishops and priests because they are our shepherds and because we love them. Is CCC 841 is in error? It is probably not if viewed from the concept that I mentioned above.
“From that time to the present a false prophet named Mohammed has appeared in their midst. This man, after having chanced upon the Old and New Testaments and likewise, it seems, having conversed with an Arian monk, [101] devised his own heresy. Then, having insinuated himself into the good graces of the people by a show of seeming piety, he gave out that a certain book had been sent down to him from heaven. He had set down some ridiculous compositions in this book of his and he gave it to them as an object of veneration.”

Its not a stretch to say John Damascus considered the Muslim’s God false, considering they had a false prophet who neccessarily follows a false God. And what the catechism has to say about Islam that you worship the same God seems to me totally false. You worship a trinity, which the quran and muslims declare as a false doctrine of shirk in which You are damned for all eternity (according to the quran). So yes, that part of your catechism is false.
 
I don’t know, Is everything in the catecheism absolute doctrine which one must adhere to? What do you think of Saint John Damscene’s opinion on islam?
The CCC is a guideline for Catholics from the Magesterium and also it was done as a reference for Bishops.

Im assuming that if Magdi read the CCC 841 beforehand he wouldn’t have become a Catholic🤷 or be surprised (and in this case because Pope Francis is giving Muslims leaders such appreciation) with his charitable tone to Muslims.

That said the CCC 841 is taken partly from Lumen Gentium and other writings. The full context can be only reconciled with those other writings. As far as to me personally it doesn’t mean if the Catholic Church is giving some sort of concession for Muslims that weakens Catholic teaching in any way or be an excuse to leave the Church. Especially since** there is no mention of the prophet of Islam**.

Re St. John Damscene’s. Yes, that was his opinion. Was he in a teaching capacity too?

MJ
 
“From that time to the present a false prophet named Mohammed has appeared in their midst. This man, after having chanced upon the Old and New Testaments and likewise, it seems, having conversed with an Arian monk, [101] devised his own heresy. Then, having insinuated himself into the good graces of the people by a show of seeming piety, he gave out that a certain book had been sent down to him from heaven. He had set down some ridiculous compositions in this book of his and he gave it to them as an object of veneration.”

Its not a stretch to say John Damascus considered the Muslim’s God false, considering they had a false prophet who neccessarily follows a false God. And what the catechism has to say about Islam that you worship the same God seems to me totally false. You worship a trinity, which the quran and muslims declare as a false doctrine of shirk in which You are damned for all eternity (according to the quran). So yes, that part of your catechism is false.
We can say the same about the Jews with regards to the Trinity. Do they worship that one God?

By saying Mohammad was false, does not necessarily mean that they do not worship God.

There is only one God. Anyone who claims to worship God then it has to be that one God. They can be wrong in their knowledge about that God but it does not mean that there are many Gods.
 
The CCC is a guideline for Catholics from the Magesterium and also it was done as a reference for Bishops.

Im assuming that if Magdi read the CCC 841 beforehand he wouldn’t have become a Catholic🤷 or be surprised (and in this case because Pope Francis is giving Muslims leaders such appreciation) with his charitable tone to Muslims.

That said the CCC 841 is taken partly from Lumen Gentium and other writings. The full context can be only reconciled with those other writings. As far as to me personally it doesn’t mean if the Catholic Church is giving some sort of concession for Muslims that weakens Catholic teaching in any way or be an excuse to leave the Church. Especially since** there is no mention of the prophet of Islam**.

Re St. John Damscene’s. Yes, that was his opinion. Was he in a teaching capacity too?

MJ
Yes, we can refer to the saints but their opinions need not be accepted.
 
We can say the same about the Jews with regards to the Trinity. Do they worship that one God?

By saying Mohammad was false, does not necessarily mean that they do not worship God.

There is only one God. Anyone who claims to worship God then it has to be that one God. They can be wrong in their knowledge about that God but it does not mean that there are many Gods.
Yes I say that exact thing about Jews. They have told God he is not God. They have said to Christ, their messiah that he is not God and thus he will not accept them. jews and Christians do not worship the same God.

But John Damascus goes even further to say that hte muslims say all sorts of absurd things about their God. But yes, in denying Christ as God, they deny God. Unless you are a tritheist, which I know Catholics are not. Christ and the father share the exact same essence, and to deny one is to deny the other.
 
Yes I say that exact thing about Jews. They have told God he is not God. They have said to Christ, their messiah that he is not God and thus he will not accept them. jews and Christians do not worship the same God.

But John Damascus goes even further to say that hte muslims say all sorts of absurd things about their God. But yes, in denying Christ as God, they deny God. Unless you are a tritheist, which I know Catholics are not. Christ and the father share the exact same essence, and to deny one is to deny the other.
I think this is just word play. The principle is the same. Both the Jews and the Muslims worship God but they lack the full knowledge and truth about God.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top