Actually, adults use the exact same “reasons” for supporting Obama and his failed power structure. But it’s worse hearing this from grown-ups, b/c they SHOULD have gained a little wisdom from life experience, and rejected the transparent charlatan accordingly.
RobWell said, Mickey. The greatest tragedy to me is that Obama won another four years with the votes of so many who call themselves Christians. If my personal pastor had supported Obama, I’d join another church. Christianity has never stood for fleecing people, and taxing and regulating folks out of their own homes and businesses. No wonder Christianity in the West lies in shambles now. In my view, if you don’t stand for Truth, you have deserted God. Just maybe, God has now deserted America.
Rob“if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then will I hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and will heal their land.”
Until he leaves the stage - then the media tells the lemmings what to think.
Hello ProVobis. Your analogy is wrong because Hitler killed millions and Stalin also killed millions.
Ben Franklin, upon the ratification of the constitution and in response to someone asking “well doctor, what did we get - a republic or a monarchy?” responded, " ***A republic. If you can keep it. ***
Yes, Planned Parenthood helped defeat Romney. So did those who refused to vote for him because he didn’t conform 100% to Catholic teaching on abortion.
It’s absurd and respectfully, it might be cruel and yet, this is the daily reasoning we hear.
You summed it up well.
The new Lincoln movie, I haven’t seen it but Tommy Lee Jones plays a politician who is a total abolitionist, But Lincoln’s reasoning I believe that to go North you may have to go East or West first. This is similar. People who use this other reasoning to me, are not being pragmatic or one might even question their motivations as being sincere. As it is Romney/Ryan stuck their necks out for us along with a pledge to defund planned parenthood.
At lifesitenews now, Planned Parenthood in a story claims credit for getting Obama reelected.
lifenews.com/2012/11/19/planned-parenthood-takes-credit-for-re-electing-obama/
And PPH ran anti-Romney commercials.
The voter guide you are talking about didn’t include the Constitution Party candidate, it only compared bad and worse. Romney supports intrinsic evils. This is a fact. No catholic is obligated to vote for any candidate who supports intrinsic evils. You have to defend yourself for voting for Romney, I don’t.
Romney lost, you know. But since you brought it up, what intrinsic evils did he support?
GW Bush appointed two justices, both recognized as prolife. Had he appointed one more, it would have been a majority. But enough people voted for Obama, guaranteeing two more abortion-supporters on the Court.
Every pro lifer should pray that none of the pro life Justices retire in the next 4 years because if Obama gets to pick a Justice, roe v wade cemented for decades
No president alone is going to overturn RvW. Surely you know that. The right case has to be brought before the court to even limit it in some way. IMO, voting for a candidate who has absolutely no chance of winning is futility, but if it makes you feel better, have at it. I wonder if you will feel any guilt, abortion aside, when our economy tanks more than it has already and we become a socialist-like state and even more people lose their jobs?
Good point. If you’re talking about a Constitutional Amendment, it doesn’t require the intervention or signature of a President or the Supreme Court.
Didn’t Nixon’s appointee Blackmun cement Roe with the Doe decision in 1992 when GWH Bush was in office?
That’s true, but I’ve made it know on here that I don’t buy the fact that abortion is the absolute main issue or that people on here vote chiefly to help others.
We’ve had a law overturned by voters in South Dakota and a personhood amendment go up in flames in Mississippi.
Presidents can’t overturn a Supreme Court ruling.
If activists insist on using the federal courts to interfere with states rights or private religious institutions, a Federal Constitutional Amendment is fair game.
:sad_yes::sad_yes::sad_yes:
