Roy Moore's Accuser Count is now up to 9

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoshuaIsLord
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
ProVobis:
OTOH, we should hope Roy Moore will never be in a position to legislate in matters of child molesting.
Click to expand...
The problem with this theory of yours ProVobis is it ASSUMES Roy Moore is guilty. It has a built-in assumption that allegations = guilt (selectively here).

And that is not persuasive.
 
Last edited:
I grew up with the Libertarian Party. Though my views have changed since 911, they have not changed enough to favor either major party. So you know.
 
Jig_Saw said:
40.png
qui_est_ce:
How can you prove it’s a forgery unless the handwriting has been analyzed?
Click to expand...
Exactly, which is why I said questioned the claims that it had been proven to be a forgery.
Click to expand...
Why hasn’t the handwriting been analyzed?
 
Not necessary that he be proven guilty. Would you hire Casey Anthony to babysit your kid?
 
ProVobis:
I grew up with the Libertarian Party. Though my views have changed since 911, they have not changed enough to favor either major party. So you know.
Click to expand...
That’s fine.

Then disavow abortion as a Libertarian.

I’d be OK with that.

Heck. I’d be OK with a disavowing of abortion from Democrats. . . . But it just doesn’t happen (at least on a national political candidate scale). Abortion is an implicit Democrat litmus test.

Here’s to hoping good Catholic Democrats will change that “right quick”.
 
Last edited:
ProVobis.
Would you hire Casey Anthony to babysit your kid?
Click to expand...
This is irrelevant. I haven’t even came out in support of Moore yet. (But Jones is CLEARLY disqualified on the basis of Jones OPENLY favoring the kind of child abuse I outlined above–child abuse that no liberal here has yet stepped forward to condemn here on this thread yet).

But I AM saying the old liberal methods of attempting to shame people into voting for liberals isn’t working anymore.

And I explained part of the reasons why.
 
Last edited:
Cathoholic said:
Then disavow abortion as a Libertarian
Click to expand...
I voted for Ron Paul, if it matters. And yes, I would like to take that one clause out of their platform, which otherwise protects life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
 
Last edited:
F_Marturana:

I asked you earlier . . .
But Doug Jones easily could turn out to be the deciding vote AGAINST LIFE in possible future pro-life legislation.

This would be a disaster don’t you agree?
Click to expand...
I am still awaiting your answer.
 
No. I care very much. But it must be beyond a shadow of a doubt that this was done. And you repeating “he said s she saids” is not making your claims any more persuasive

(while at the same time YOU ignore aspects that are beyond allegations. Aspects that admittedly by Jones INCLUDE him being OK with murdering innocent babies. But now is your chance to disavow that Jig_Saw and say you CANNOT support Doug Jones abusive ideas. So go ahead and disavow them. I’ll be waiting. . . .).
Click to expand...
Jig_Saw??
 
What happened to the old CAF rule against harassment of fellow posters?

I’m done with this thread.
 
Last edited:
Women can’t be trusted you know…right back to Eve. Need a man to confirm what really happened.
…
 
ProVobis:
What happened to the old CAF rule against harassment of fellow posters?
Click to expand...
.

ProVobis (to Cathoholic):
Would you hire Casey Anthony to babysit your kid?
Click to expand...
Why is it ProVobis, that you think when you ask me if I would hire Casey Anthony as my babysitter (And I give you an answer), it is NOT harassment?

But when I ask YOU to disavow abortion . . .

. . . poignant questioning suddenly morphs into “harassment”?
 
Last edited:
I don’t know of anyone here who is defending Moore’s " alleged" actions.At this point,nothing has been definitely proven much as you might like that to be the case.Time to bring out the dead horse again…🐴
 
Jeanne_S said:
I don’t know of anyone here who is defending Moore’s " alleged" actions.At this point,nothing has been definitely proven much as you might like that to be the case.Time to bring out the dead horse again…🐴
Click to expand...
If you read all the posts, then you would realize a consistent effort to discredit his accusers would qualify as defending Moore’s actions. I think the evidence against him is very strong and the story told by Leigh Corfman is very compelling. Factor in Moore’s own comments and lies and I think you are looking at these accusations being true beyond a reasonable doubt, but I’m sure that wouldn’t convince you because you hate Democrats more than you hate child molesters.
 
Jeanne_S said:
nothing has been definitely proven much as you might like that to be the case LOLLOL
Click to expand...
This from one of the HRC accuser extraordinaires.
Was that a dead horse, red horse, or red herring?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top