Roy Moore's Accuser Count is now up to 9

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoshuaIsLord
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It’s not a loaded question. Roy Moore has been accused of sexual activity with a 14 year old girl. Is it right or is it wrong?
Click to expand...
Yes I want your answer on this one too.
 
Last edited:
And the Republicans loved Clarence Thomas.

Interesting thing though that Dixon (D-Ill) was accused of sexual misconduct. And he was the one who cast the deciding vote to confirm Thomas, who had been of course accused by Anita Hill.

How things would have been different had Dixon resigned.
 
Last edited:
I was reading the paper on Sunday about Roy Moore.

Most of the Political Reps in Alabama are keeping their mouth shut for fear of getting their head lopped off if they were to raise their head above the fray.
 
JoshuaIsLord said:
I was reading the paper on Sunday about Roy Moore.

Most of the Political Reps in Alabama are keeping their mouth shut for fear of getting their head lopped off if they were to raise their head above the fray.
Click to expand...
Alabama’s largest newspaper has yanked its support from Moore. I don’t think Jones’ victory is a given, but I think the tide is turning. It’s certainly a black eye for Bannon, who seems set on remaking the Republican Party in his image. Well, if Roy Moore is the future of the Republican party, then Flake was right, it is doomed.
 
Well if Moore gets elected, we will see if the Reps in the Senate are all talk or not. It will be prime example of “Put Up” or “Shut Up”.
 
JoshuaIsLord said:
Well if Moore gets elected, we will see if the Reps in the Senate are all talk or not. It will be prime example of “Put Up” or “Shut Up”.
Click to expand...
You heard it from Conway. It doesn’t matter if Moore was sexually assaulting teenagers back in the day. All that matters is votes in the Senate.
 
Well, he will get his day. If not now then in the after-life. Too bad his brand of Christianity does not believe in the final purification…
 
I can’t understand how people believe any alternative fact publication that come their way. But they disbelieve 7 different women who allege Roy Moore molested them.

Incredible.

😡😠😡😠
 
This unwarranted attack on Senator McConnell reminds me of something I read earlier today.
  1. Innocent until proven guilty.
  2. Statute of limitations.
  3. No criminal charges ever brought.
    [There are church rules against bearing false witness, against calumny, against gossip, and against other false accusations. I strongly urge people who are bringing those allegations to talk to their confessor.]
 
Jig_Saw said:
This unwarranted attack on Senator McConnell reminds me of something I read earlier today.
  1. Innocent until proven guilty.
  2. Statute of limitations.
  3. No criminal charges ever brought.
    [There are church rules against bearing false witness, against calumny, against gossip, and against other false accusations. I strongly urge people who are bringing those allegations to talk to their confessor.]
Click to expand...
Unwarranted isn’t the word. Fictitious is the word I’d use.
 
I will say you’re treading a very fine line here… What exactly are you trying to prove? That this behavior was commonplace in the 70s? If so, why do you wish to prove that? Does that somehow exonerate Roy Moore of his actions?
 
Let me fix that for you,
For many years and to the present date, Roy Moore has been and is masquerading as a bible quoting pro-life Republican, when in actuality he is a sexual predator.
Click to expand...
 
Hope_Philomena said:
I will say you’re treading a very fine line here… What exactly are you trying to prove? That this behavior was commonplace in the 70s? If so, why do you wish to prove that? Does that somehow exonerate Roy Moore of his actions?
Click to expand...
I responded to another poster, correcting the revisionism people are expressing.
Breaking the law was as wrong then as it is now.
 
So I guess Roy Moore is running for office. I never heard of him before this.

I guess I don’t feel the need to defend him just because he may be a conservative. Nor do I feel the need to fill the role of judge and jury. If he did what he was accused of, that was certainly wrong of him and it seems like a bad idea to put him in public office unless he expresses some type of acknowledgement that he did a terrible thing that he would never condone or do again.
 
www.al.com

Don't believe Roy Moore's accusers? Then listen to Moore

Moore says he first took notice of his wife when she was 15 or 16. He was about 30.
www.al.com www.al.com

"It’s a simple matter of subtraction. When Roy Moore first took notice of Kayla she would have been as young as 15.

There’s a little fuzziness, to be sure, in the timeline. There’s the “or something” Moore fudges with in the interview. Eight years before could have been slightly too early to put Moore in Gadsden, he started work as an deputy district attorney there in 1977.

So maybe she was 15, or maybe she was 16. But still, here is a grown man at about 30 years old attending a girls’ dance recital, and doing what exactly?"
 
Frankly I didn’t think he was a good person to put in public office even before all these allegations. He has a blatant disrespect for the constitution and has a bad habit of putting his faith before the law. There’s nothing wrong with putting your faith before your politics, but when you’re in a position of power, your religious beliefs shouldn’t trump the rule of law. He broke that assumed rule twice and was removed twice.
 
Link said:
Frankly I didn’t think he was a good person to put in public office even before all these allegations. He has a blatant disrespect for the constitution and has a bad habit of putting his faith before the law. There’s nothing wrong with putting your faith before your politics, but when you’re in a position of power, your religious beliefs shouldn’t trump the rule of law. He broke that assumed rule twice and was removed twice.
Click to expand...
But that’s precisely why Bannon picked him. This is the kind of Republican politicians Bannon wants to replace RINOs, moderates, and heck just about any Republican currently in office with. He wants men like Moore in Congress, he wants them running Congress. Keep that in mind as Bannon tries to muck up every Republican Primary. Maybe not all the candidates with the Steve Bannon stamp of approval will be quite so egregious in their flaunting of the Constitution, but they will all be somewhere along the spectrum.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top