Roy Moore's Accuser Count is now up to 9

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoshuaIsLord
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I know, and it’s scary. But history tends to repeat itself, and just as democrats faced a backlash after Obama’s election in 2008, I could see the republicans facing the same consequences. Trump and then Bannon-based republicans cater to a small chunk of voters. I wouldn’t be surprised if next year we see a democratic sweep.
 
Why is it that the other politician/Hollywood scandal threads were consolidated except for the one on Ray Moore?
 
niceatheist said:
He wants men like Moore in Congress,
Click to expand...
What, reformed Democrats? I am encouraged that all these accusations seem to have occurred when he was younger, single, and with the other party. Marriage and the GOP seem to have helped him.
 
Maybe we can let Paul Shanley out of jail. When did he molest boys, the '70’s? I’m sure he hasn’t molested anyone for a while.

Right and Wrong are dependent on political party. A molester is a fine candidate as long as he’s a republican.

He sought out a vulnerable young woman whose parents were divorced. She told various people during the course of her lifetime.
 
Well, I’m not an attorney. Roy Moore is an Alabama attorney.

I’m not an Alabama attorney. Roy Moore is an Alabama attorney.

I’m not a judge. Roy Moore is an Alabama judge.

Roy Moore talks about pro-life.

His opponent is an outspoken pro-abortion advocate.

Some of Roy Moore’s accusers are active workers for Bill and Hillary Clinton.

It has been 40 years since the alleged offenses took place; where have his accusers been hiding for 40 years?

Some of the “evidence” against Roy Moore CLEARLY was forged … and forged poorly.

One of his accusers refuses to make the evidence available for inspection.

So … who needs a trial? … we have accusations and … off with his head.
 
I know I looked older at 14 than 14, it’s not something I could have helped.

It’s pretty gross a pastor would say that.
 
No one is decapitating him.

His past should send him to jail. But he’s not going to go.

His past should preclude him from being a janitor at a school or hospital or any occupation being near children.

His past should also preclude him from the privilege of public office.

Should OJ be senator if he were anti abortion?How about Paul Shanley?
 
Forty years ago, Roy Moore was a complete nobody. He could have been accused, charged, found guilty EASILY, and sent to prison. But he was ignored.

Thirty years ago, Roy Moore was a complete nobody. He could have been accused, charged, found guilty EASILY, and sent to prison. But he was ignored.

Twenty years ago, Roy Moore was a complete nobody. He could have been accused, charged, found guilty EASILY, and sent to prison. But he was ignored.

Ten years ago, Roy Moore was a complete nobody. He could have been accused, charged, found guilty EASILY, and sent to prison. But he was ignored.

Five years ago, Roy Moore was a complete nobody. He could have been accused, charged, found guilty EASILY, and sent to prison. But he was ignored.

Two years ago, Roy Moore was a complete nobody. He could have been accused, charged, found guilty EASILY, and sent to prison. But he was ignored.

All of a sudden, Roy Moore is a target worth attacking.

Is that how you go after a criminal? You wait for half a century … you pass up an easy conviction … until he gains some secular prominence AND THEN YOU GO AFTER HIM.
.
.
.
.
.
The only conclusion one can come to is that the accusations against Roy Moore are complete fabrications … put up solely for political assassination motivations.

.
.
.
NOW, Roy Moore has political opponents … and they want his head. If his Senate seat goes to the Democrats, then maybe, just maybe, the Democrats maybe can capture the U.S. Senate and then maybe impeach and remove President Donald Trump.
.
.
.
Seems like more than likely motivation for a political assassination.
.
.
.
They wanted Hillary Clinton for president.
.
.
.
And maybe there is still a chance.
 
Last edited:
He was a DA.

It is common for victims of abuse to not bring charges,
Or to not say anything
 
Nope.

Not when he was just starting out.

He would have been easy pickings for police and the D.A. at the time.

It would have been extremely easy to get rid of him back then.

He could easily have been sidelined to defending drunk drivers and writing wills.
 
Last edited:
You obviously have no clue what victims of child abuse, of sexual abuse go through.

No clue at all.
 
James Wright, former Lawyer at Dewey, Cheatem & Howe (1985-2015)
I mistrusted him before these allegations came out.

Let me preface this by saying that I practiced law in Alabama for 30 years and that I appeared before Judge Roy. I wrote another answer on this, but in sum he forced Bill Pryor, the Attorney General at the time, to prosecute him before the Alabama Court of the Judiciary for failing to move his Ten Commandments rock. Judge Pryor did his duty without flinching, but in my opinion it cost him his political career in Alabama and I think that’s why President Bush appointed Judge Pryor to the U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. That took guts on Judge Pryor’s part.

On the other hand Judge Roy could have resigned and spared Judge Pryor this grief. Did he spare Judge Pryor? Nope. Some big Christian, huh? Nope. In my world a compassionate man would not have done that to Judge Pryor, but a regular old, run of the mill Alabama political opportunist definitely would. So after that I figured he was just another regular old run of the mill Alabama political opportunist suckering in the multitudes of evangelicals with God talk. They eat that stuff up, and don’t ask too many questions. Some might call ’em easy marks, same way George Wallace suckered in racists so he could use power to get and give political favors.

Politics in Alabama is about getting and giving favors. George Wallace exploited racism to get himself elected so he could get and give favors. In my view Judge Roy is exploiting religion in the same way.

These recent sexual allegations are consistent with a powerful man trying to use his power to get laid. Sounds consistent with what I already thought about Judge Roy.
Click to expand...
 
I_trust said:
Why is it that the other politician/Hollywood scandal threads were consolidated except for the one on Ray Moore?
Click to expand...
I remember seeing some separate threads. I didn’t know they had been consolidated. But in either case I think Moore is more of a person of special interest since the outcome of this election will have a persisting influence on policy and our lives.
 
MonteRCMS said:
If individuals go too much further with these assertions, they could be open to personal lawsuits for slander or worse.
Click to expand...
Only if they are false
MonteRCMS said:
For many years and to the present date, Roy Moore has been and is a bible quoting pro-life Republican.
His opponent is a pro-abortion Democrat.
So, who do you want in Congress?
Click to expand...
Someone who knows it is wrong to sexually exploit young girls.
It has been 40 years since the alleged offenses took place; where have his accusers been hiding for 40 years?
Click to expand...
Living in fear and shame. Until you have personally experienced being sexually violated by someone in power, do not casually assume what you would do in their shoes.
The other ‘accuser’ is a convicted drug addict, serial sex harassment accuser, thief of taxpayer subsidized programs, bank fraud conviction, and several divorces.
Click to expand...
Ad hominem attack.
 
Last edited:
F_Marturana said:
Maybe we can let Paul Shanley out of jail. When did he molest boys, the '70’s? I’m sure he hasn’t molested anyone for a while.

Right and Wrong are dependent on political party. A molester is a fine candidate as long as he’s a republican.

He sought out a vulnerable young woman whose parents were divorced. She told various people during the course of her lifetime.
Click to expand...
There is a difference between being creepy and breaking the law.

Flirting and going on dates with underage girls is very creepy, but not illegal in and of itself.
 
All public highschools have been ruled by the State and none have ever published their highschool yearbooks before the month of May.

The other ‘accuser’ is a convicted drug addict, serial sex harassment accuser, thief of taxpayer subsidized programs, bank fraud conviction, and several divorces.
 
Theo520 said:
There is a difference between being creepy and breaking the law.

Flirting and going on dates with underage girls is very creepy, but not illegal in and of itself.
Click to expand...
He’s also accused of sexual assault which is against the law. The fact that he liked 15 year olds lends some credence to those claims. Of course, Monte is playing blame the victim while at the same time questioning why they wouldn’t have come out sooner (hint: it’s because people blame the victim).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top