Roy Moore's Accuser Count is now up to 9

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoshuaIsLord
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
God isn’t so much concerned with where we have been as much as where we are going…😌
 
Jeanne_S said:
Correct,whereas it sounds like killing baby girls and boys in utero will increase if this other guy has his druthers
Click to expand...
If you are drawing that conclusion serioulsy, then you might think a little more about your logic (and Jones’s actual position).
I think that this kind of thinking is what may have motivated Pope Francis to asks Catholics to expand that horizons beyond the politics of abortion as the source and summit of Catholic thinking.
 
So now you gen get into Roy Moores head and determine if he has asked for forgiveness.? You are so hell bent on prseverating on this issue that logic has long since left the discussion
 
Jeanne_S said:
So now you gen get into Roy Moores head and determine if he has asked for forgiveness.? You are so hell bent on prseverating on this issue that logic has long since left the discussion
Click to expand...
If he asked for forgiveness from God, he wouldn’t be lying about what happened and claiming he didn’t know the victims and none of this happened. The logic is lacking is yours and your strong desire to give Moore a pass for his past behavior.
 
niceatheist said:
You can totally ignoring his molesting children, because he hasn’t done it in a while. Is that it?
Click to expand...
Teens, not children.
No, I wouldn’t vote for him but recency of a crime does matter. That’s why many crimes have a statute of limitations in rule of law. It serves a purpose.
 
Who in this race is running on that platform boldly I might add? Must be a rhetorical question on your part. Anyway both you and Jig saw bug the heck out of me so I really don’t enjoy debating either of you it always goes on ad neauseum.Ta Ta…
 
Theo520 said:
40.png
niceatheist:
You can totally ignoring his molesting children, because he hasn’t done it in a while. Is that it?
Click to expand...
Teens, not children.
No, I wouldn’t vote for him but recency of a crime does matter. That’s why many crimes have a statute of limitations in rule of law. It serves a purpose.
Click to expand...
So it’s much better to molest 14 year olds
 
Jeanne_S said:
Anyway both you and Jig saw bug the heck out of me so I really don’t enjoy debating either of you it always goes on ad neauseum.Ta Ta…
Click to expand...
Often your arguments do not stand up well to scrutiny, which is why it’s bad to only listen to right wing media. It’s an echo chamber and your points of view aren’t challenged. By subjecting your arguments to scrutiny, you will often be able to form a stronger argument to support your view or even, possibly, change your mind.
 
Jeanne_S said:
Who in this race is running on that platform boldly I might add? Must be a rhetorical question on your part. Anyway both you and Jig saw bug the heck out of me so I really don’t enjoy debating either of you it always goes on ad neauseum.Ta Ta…
Click to expand...
You misrepresent the positions of candidates and parties on the issue of abortion. You accept empty rhetoric - and legislative empty gestures - laden with exceptions for the health of the mother - as though it would bring some substantive change, and take the position of supporting access - in a plurallistic society in which most people simply do not believe as we do - as though it were advocacy for abortion itself. Your position has not helped and will not help solve this problem. Anyone who care about these innocents ought to be looking for solutions rather than simply getting a Republican elected, however lacking in character the candidate is.
 
Jeanne_S said:
Correct,whereas it sounds like killing baby girls and boys in utero will increase if this other guy has his druthers😠
Click to expand...
Ah, yes, the “but abortion!” defense.

Republicans in Alabama could have chosen his pro-life primary opponent, but instead they chose this guy. Putting aside the very, very credible stories about his proclivity for teenage girls, his amply-demonstrated contempt for constitutional government should have disqualified him. You’d think so, given conservatives’ supposed great regard for the Constitution, but apparently not.

Alabama Republicans could have chosen a pro-life candidate who’s not a creep, but they’d rather have this guy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top