Rubutting a Baptist on Faith and Works

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhoenixRider
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
In early Church – most converts were older and thus heard the proclamation of the Gospel and had faith (by grace of course)…and then were baptized. some it seems were infants (they were whole households as we see in acts) and were baptized into the faith of the Church and thus faith was infused into them for the first time at baptism…

today with many children being born into Christian homes …it happens the other way around…most receive the faith at baptism and increase in it as they live more and more in Christ. Some are baptized at an older stage and so likely first have faith from hearing the Gospel. all is via grave. all is by the Holy Spirit…

In ANY case Faith is a gift from God. Period.

God works in us. Even in the gift of Faith.

All is from Jesus Christ and from his death and resurrection!

We are saved by Jesus Christ!

For a beautiful rendering of the understanding of Faith and Works…

vatican.va/holy_father/be…081119_en.html

vatican.va/holy_father/be…081126_en.html
 
Not True. If we are saved by baptism, then point one (Jesus saves) would and could not be true. We are not saved by deeds done in righteousness by rather by His mercy
We are saved by baptism in the same way General Naaman in 2Kings was cured of leprosy by washing in the Jordan seven times. Or the man blind from birth was cured by washing the mud from his eyes in the Pool of Shiloam. Or the woman who was bleeding was saved by touching Jesus’ cloak. Or an Israelite was saved from the fiery serpents by looking upon the bronze serpent held up.
 
Your emphasis upon baptism for receiving faith is misplaced. The faith received does not as a majority of the time comes at baptism. Baptism is always an outward sign of an inward work which has been accomplished by the Holy Spirit.
Faith and Baptism go together…

Many many …and in fact a majority these days…Catholics Orthodox Lutherans etc…way out number baptists etc.

Anyhow that is not the point.

Baptism is not just an outward sign…not in the Scriptures. But yes of course it is the work of the Holy Spirit. For water without the Holy Spirit only washes dirt away…or gives a drink etc…

Baptism is a work of the Holy Spirit.
 
Titus 3:5

…he saved us, not because of deeds done by us in righteousness, but in virtue of his own mercy,** by the**** washing of regeneration** and renewal in the Holy Spirit Which he poured out upon us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior…RSV CE

We do not earn by our deeds entering into Christ…being a new creation…entering into salvation…it is a gift from God. both faith and baptism are gifts.

And Baptism is normally to be involved …and not just as a sign…it is really a sign -yes…but in that sign…the Holy Spirit works in a way not seen by our eyes…when one is baptized ones sins are washed away…we are a new creation etc …the Holy Spirit is thus at work…it is not the water alone…just like it was not the mud alone or the spit alone that Jesus used when healing others…it is the power of GOD.

Baptism is truly a washing of regeneration…

It is the action of the Holy Spirit…it is through Jesus Christ…

not just running water…
 
we are justified by faith …

But scripture contemplates 2 kinds of faith

a living faith and a dead faith

only one of these does us any good

that is living faith

scripture says that works bring faith to life

faith vs works is a false dichotomy and a lie.
 
“Happy are you who believe!” (cf 1 Peter 2:7). Let us turn to Jesus! He alone is the way that leads to eternal happiness, the truth who satisfies the deepest longings of every heart, and the life who brings ever new joy and hope, to us and to our world." Homily at Yankee Stadium by Pope Benedict XVI
 
PhoenixRider :New Member

*It is evident that the Catholic position that salvation comes through NOT Only Faith, which is absolutely essential to the process, but by Faith as demonstrated; that is “proven” through good works, is clearly at odds with the Baptist [and many other protestant denominations belief understanding. ] As there is but a single truth for every issue; one of these positions must be in error.

The CC holds that any position that does not agree with Catholic Teaching, on matters of Faith and Morals, is wrong. How do we prove this?*

Matt.5: 16 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven.

Rom.2: 6 For he will render to every man according to his works:

Heb. 6: 10 For God is not so unjust as to overlook your work and the love which you showed for his sake in serving the saints, as you still do.

James 2: “Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness”; and he was called the friend of God. You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone. For as the body apart from the spirit is dead, so faith apart from works is dead.

Quite simply, the Baptist position is anti-biblical; actually teaching against what the bible actually teaches.

The Baptist position: Gal.2: 16 “yet who know that a man is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, in order to be justified by faith in Christ, and not by works of the law, because by works of the law shall no one be justified.”
There are 2 types of justification. Paul says God is our Judge and He is going to judge us according to our record, and God’s justice will judge us according to our faith
o That means being justified before God is determine by your faith in Christ.
Obviously, there is a contradiction in this position. God is going to judge us by our “record,” which means what we have freely chosen to do. Rom.2: 6 “For he will render to every man according to his works:” Rom. 3:28 “For we hold that a man is justified by faith apart from works of law.” So which is it? The Bible cannot contradict itself.
o God will not justify you because you get baptized, because you join the church, because you live a good life, because you are a good husband, a good housewife, a good son, you repented of your sins and turn a new life and all that…
o You will be justified before God if you will put your faith in Jesus Christ as your Lord and saviour and that faith is counted for your righteous deeds.
*Actually one is entirely “justified” by Baptism. Which not only removes all sins [prior to the Baptism] but also all the latent effects of sin. Anyone properly Baptized and them immediately dies; is going straight to heaven. Acts.2: 38 “And Peter said to them, "Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. “ *

We agree that Faith is required for ones salvation.
o On the other hand, James is not talking about being justified before God. — James is talking about being justified before man. o In short we have two judges: (1) We have God who judge us (2) A man who judges us.”
Illustration:
o I would say, Pastor Rey is a good pastor. Why? I have judged him. How did I judge him?
o By the way he behaves, by the way he preaches, by his works
*Here is the problem. Indeed the bible does speak of “two kinds” of works: “works of the law,” and “good works” However it’s not God’s and man’s judgment.

The bible, very precisely; speaks of two different categories of works. “”Works of the Law,” and “good works.” “Works of the law,” [non-justifying] refer to the expanded commandments, that went from 10 to 613. Obedience to them is usually prudent and good, but there is NO “merit.” [Rom. 3:28], but good works as spoken of in James 2, and Rom. 2:6, speak to Christ “New Commandment of Love your neighbor as yourself.” And in these works there is great and necessary [for salvation ] merit.*
 
@unacanta,

I’m sorry but you’re going to have to expound upon how “baptism saves” contradicts in anyway with “Jesus saves”. Baptism saves, it’s an axiom. Christ made this clear. No one particular sacrament though, saves one absolutly, with out any possiblity of remission (on our part) through sin.
Baptism remits sin. Therefore it saves. But the baptized person can still commit sin. Therefore the baptized person can lose their salvation [by sinning]. Therefore, some other mechanism is needed to deal with sin committed after baptism. This is the sacrament of Reconciliation. As for Jesus saves. The sacraments are empowered by Jesus since He is the one who instituted them. So by receiving the sacraments, especially baptism and Reconciliation sin is remitted and the person is sanctified.
 
"Following St Paul, we have seen that man is unable to “justify” himself with his own actions, but can only truly become “just” before God because God confers his “justice” upon him, uniting him to Christ his Son. And man obtains this union through faith. In this sense, St Paul tells us: not our deeds, but rather faith renders us “just”. This faith, however, is not a thought, an opinion, an idea. This faith is communion with Christ, which the Lord gives to us, and thus becomes life, becomes conformity with him. Or to use different words faith, if it is true, if it is real, becomes love, becomes charity, is expressed in charity. A faith without charity, without this fruit, would not be true faith. It would be a dead faith.

Thus, in our last Catechesis, we discovered two levels: that of the insignificance of our actions and of our deeds to achieve salvation, and that of “justification” through faith which produces the fruit of the Spirit. The confusion of these two levels has caused more than a few misunderstandings in Christianity over the course of centuries. In this context it is important that St Paul, in the same Letter to the Galatians radically accentuates, on the one hand, the freely given nature of justification that is not dependent on our works, but which at the same time also emphasizes the relationship between faith and charity, between faith and works: “In Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision counts for anything, but only faith working through love” (Gal 5: 6). Consequently, there are on the one hand “works of the flesh”, which are “immorality, impurity, licentiousness, idolatry…” (Gal 5: 19-20): all works that are contrary to the faith; on the other, there is the action of the Holy Spirit who nourishes Christian life, inspiring “love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control” (Gal 5: 22-23). These are the fruits of the Spirit that blossom from faith.

Agape, love, is cited at the beginning of this list of virtues and self-control at the conclusion. In fact, the Spirit who is the Love of the Father and the Son pours out his first gift, agape, into our hearts (cf. Rm 5: 5); and to be fully expressed, agape, love, requires self-control. In my first Encyclical, Deus Caritas Est, I also treated of the love of the Father and the Son which reaches us and profoundly transforms our existence. Believers know that reciprocal love is embodied in the love of God and of Christ, through the Spirit. Let us return to the Letter to the Galatians. Here St Paul says that by bearing one another’s burdens believers are fulfilling the commandment of love (cf. Gal 6: 2).
Justified through the gift of faith in Christ, we are called to live in the love of Christ for neighbour, because it is on this criterion that we shall be judged at the end of our lives."

Pope Benedict XVI

vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/audiences/2008/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20081126_en.html
 
We are saved by Faith.

(one can not say “we are not saved by faith”…for this is contrary to the Catholic faith…now i know where you were going with this…but on its own such a statement is incorrect…)

(more in next post)
If you are going to quote me then quote me correctly. Don’t chop quote me. I said:

“We are not saved by faith. We are saved by GRACE.”

In addition, the Council of Trent said in canon IX:

CANON IX.-If any one saith, that by faith alone the impious is justified; in such wise as to mean, that nothing else is required to co-operate in order to the obtaining the grace of Justification, and that it is not in any way necessary, that he be prepared and disposed by the movement of his own will; let him be anathema.

I agree with Trent.
 
If you are going to quote me then quote me correctly. Don’t chop quote me. I said:

“We are not saved by faith. We are saved by GRACE.”

In addition, the Council of Trent said in canon IX:

CANON IX.-If any one saith, that by faith alone the impious is justified; in such wise as to mean, that nothing else is required to co-operate in order to the obtaining the grace of Justification, and that it is not in any way necessary, that he be prepared and disposed by the movement of his own will; let him be anathema.

I agree with Trent.
I did not disagree with the grace part. that is a true statement. Thus I singled out this which was not true. Did not intend to just isolate it to make it seem that that was all you said …for one can read where it came from and see the grace part…it is easier to point out what one is taking about it one selects just a line.

To say “we are not saved by faith” would be incorrect.

We are saved by faith.

As St. Paul and Pope Benedict tell us.

(Now I know you meant to say in a total way…we are not saved by faith alone in a certain sense…)

It is important to not make such statements…for they are not true. And our brothers will misunderstand us.
 
I did not disagree with the grace part. that is a true statement. Thus I singled out this which was not true. Did not intend to just isolate it to make it seem that that was all you said …for one can read where it came from and see the grace part…it is easier to point out what one is taking about it one selects just a line.

To say “we are not saved by faith” would be incorrect.

We are saved by faith.

As St. Paul and Pope Benedict tell us.

(Now I know you meant to say in a total way…we are not saved by faith alone in a certain sense…)

It is important to not make such statements…for they are not true. And our brothers will misunderstand us.
When protestants say we are saved by faith they mean we are saved by faith ALONE [sola fide]. When I say we are not saved by faith we are saved by grace I mean that we are not saved by faith but by grace. To say we are saved by faith is tantamount to saying we didn’t need Jesus to die on the cross. All we needed to be saved was faith. Our salvation [faith] was within us and Jesus died unnecessarily. But when we say we are saved by GRACE then we do need Jesus because it was through Jesus death that we receive the grace of salvation. Recall that the original sin of Adam was a loss of grace that was restored with Jesus’ death. And I highly doubt if any pope would disagreee with me.
 
Baptism is very much part of it…and Christ commands it.

“Baptism… now saves you” (from first Peter 3:21)

3 Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? 4 We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life. Rom 6: 3-4

38 And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. Acts 2:38 (I used ESV for these quotes…an Evangelical edition)

You misunderstand what is meant by works of the law…or deeds or righteousness…

in anycase

Baptism is received… no one can baptize himself!

It is no more a “work” done by a person being baptized than is it a work of the baby to be born…

Baptism is a work of God. In fact when anyone baptizes…it is Christ who baptizes.
I Peter 3:19-21
. . . **eing put to death in the flesh but made alive by the Spirit, by whom also [Christ] went and preached to the spirits in prison, who formerly were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was being prepared, in which a few, that is, eight souls, were saved through water. There is also an antitype which now saves us, namely baptism (not the removal of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God), through the resurrection of Jesus Christ . . . (I Peter 3:18b-21)
Beside Acts 2:38, this is the next text most strongly depended on by those in favor of the idea that baptism is necessary for salvation. The reason is obvious. This text includes the striking phrase, “an antitype which now saves us, namely baptism.” In reference to baptism Paul writes, “Not the removal of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God.” Now the physical baptism is “the removal of filth of the flesh” (cf. Hebrews 10:22). But what actually saves is “the answer of a good conscience toward God.”
This shows the close examination between this verse and Hebrews 10:22. That there is another careful distinction between outward cleansing of the body in pure water, and inward cleansing of the conscience. The same distinction is made here in II Peter 3:21, and shows that it is not the outward act which saves but the inward change which is signified by the outward act. Thus Peter refers briefly to the sign of clear conscience, the submitting to baptism, as a short way of referring to the actual thing, the clear conscience. But then for clarification he explains that it is not the sign which saves, but the thing signified: the clear conscience saves, not the physical baptism.
In this context, then, “baptism” is used metaphorically to symbolize a conscience clear before God. It is not said that it is the outward, physical act of baptism which saves, but that it is the good conscience which baptism signifies which saves. This good conscience is achieved by the washing of the conscience by the Blood of Christ (Hebrews 10:22; Titus 3:5; I John 1:7; Revelation 1:5), and is acquired entirely by faith (Romans 3:28; Ephesians 2:8-10) before baptism in water is practiced as a sign of that good conscience (Romans 4:8-11, remembering that baptism is the New Testament counterpart to circumcision; Colossians 2:11-12).
Thus we see that it is deceiving to refer simply to the phrase “[baptism] now saves us” without taking it in context with the very careful explanatory phrase which Peter uses, that is, that it is not the outward and physical act which saves, but the inward testimony of a cleansed and good conscience before God, which saves (cf. I John 3:21).

I Peter 3:21, therefore, does not prove the necessity of water baptism for salvation.

Please remember that Christ has commanded many things, is our disobedience of a command the mark of lost salvation? Of course not. We neither obtain salvation via obedience nor disobedience but rather faith in Him. Granted a demonstration of faith is baptism which is the outward sign of an inward work.**
 
@unacanta,

I’m sorry but you’re going to have to expound upon how “baptism saves” contradicts in anyway with “Jesus saves”. Baptism saves, it’s an axiom. Christ made this clear. No one particular sacrament though, saves one absolutly, with out any possiblity of remission (on our part) through sin.
Hi, you misunderstand. I view baptism as an outward sign of an inward work which has taken place. The inward work is of the Holy Spirit whom regenerates the non-believer and gives him the ability to repent and believe.

See my post below to Bookcat concerning this matter:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=6369254&postcount=35
 
When protestants say we are saved by faith they mean we are saved by faith ALONE [sola fide]. When I say we are not saved by faith we are saved by grace I mean that we are not saved by faith but by grace. To say we are saved by faith is tantamount to saying we didn’t need Jesus to die on the cross. All we needed to be saved was faith. Our salvation [faith] was within us and Jesus died unnecessarily. But when we say we are saved by GRACE then we do need Jesus because it was through Jesus death that we receive the grace of salvation. Recall that the original sin of Adam was a loss of grace that was restored with Jesus’ death. And I highly doubt if any pope would disagreee with me.
Good point, the first and only act of savings is by God by His grace. Hence, the quote 'it is the power of God to salvation" when refering to the Gospel of Christ in Rom 1:16, Paul sets aside any human endevour and gives glory to God as the author and finisher of our faith.
 
I am no theologian, so YMMV, but I have been taught (and after years of reflection recognize the profound sense in this view) that one is saved by faith alone, but that one who is truly saved by faith alone will be doing works as a simple logical consequence of having faith. So doing works alone will not save you, but having faith will both save you and prompt you to do works, per one’s facilities and vocation.
These are Luther’s sentiments.
 
Originally Posted by manygift1spirit
I am no theologian, so YMMV, but I have been taught (and after years of reflection recognize the profound sense in this view) that one is saved by faith alone, but that one who is truly saved by faith alone will be doing works as a simple logical consequence of having faith. So doing works alone will not save you, but having faith will both save you and prompt you to do works, per one’s facilities and vocation.
These are Luther’s sentiments.
Luther separated faith from works then emphasized the faith part. To Luther faith was the dog that wagged the tail [works]. So to Luther it was salvation by faith or salvation versus salvation by works. In reality the two are not separable. It is faith AND works not faith or works. We see this same separation in some protestant sects belief on Baptism. It is baptism by water AND spirit not baptism by water versus baptism by spirit.
 
Non-Catholics routinely read John 5: 28-29 and Romans 2: 5-10 and hardly stop to think of what is being said there. These verses state clearly that the inheriting of eternal life is based entirely upon our works.

Salvation is a free gift which is base on NOTHING that we do at all. Salvation means that we are entered into the Body of Christ, united to Him, and given all the privileges of adopted children. This is all done without ANY MERIT whatsoever on our parts. This is why the baptism of a baby is such a wonderful testimony to God’s grace. The baby can only get wet and be born again. Nothing a baby can do for its salvation.

However, once we are in the family of God, we are entered into a coveanant relationship with God through Christ. All covenants are entered into by the making of vows. The primary example of a covenant that the Bible shows us is the marriage covenant (Ezek. 16:8). In marriage, as with all covenants, each party promises to DO certain things. The husband and wife make vows to each other which they are expected to keep.

In the marriage of the Bride of Christ to the divine Bridegroom, we also make certain vows. We promise to turn from sin, to obey the Church, the Holy Father, and the Magisterium, and to do good works. Our doing of good works is about keeping the covenant we have made with Christ/God, our divine Bridegroom. If we do this, if we are faithful to all the promises that we have made upon being adopted into the Church, then we will receive blessing.

But if we do not do that which we promised, including good works, then we are covenant breakers. This principle applies:

Covenant keepers are blessed.

Covenant breakers are cursed.

The Last Judgment is the Judgment where we are discovered as either covenant keepers or covenant breakers. That is why it involves eternal life. According to John 5 and Romans 2, the blessing of eternal life goes to covenant keepers. The curse of eternal death goes to covenant breakers. Those who keep the covenant receive the inheritance of eternal life. Those who do not are disinherited and thrown out of the household.

Good works are absolutely essential to receiving eternal life. Those are not my words. They are BIBLE!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top