Russian punk band 'blasphemy' trial - thoughts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DL82
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
For those who think the Russian government is overreacting regarding the charges against ***** Riot, I pose the question, what do you think would happen if ***** Riot pulled a similar stunt in the US or UK, but instead of conducting there protest in an Orthodox Church, they performed it in a mosque ?
Code:
                       Personally, instead of sending the women to prison, I'd like to see them sentenced to performing some lengthy form of community service for the Orthodox Church.
If the Orthodox churchmen have any awareness of/regard for PR, they won’t want to make a big deal about forcing Feminists to serve them.
 
Femen have also protested at the Vatican and this year’s European Football Championship. Illustrating the complete absurdity of feminism, they oppose the exploitation of women,** by having a group of attractive young women expose there bodies in public**.
Not everyone thinks there is something inherently shameful about the female body:shrug:
 
Not everyone thinks there is something inherently shameful about the female body:shrug:
…oh, wee lamb… the point is WAAAAAAY back there. You missed it.

It is not the female body itself which is shameful, it’s the way the beauty of the femanine form has become a commodity that is a cause of shame. Women are expected to be objects that are only good for looking pretty.

And, on the main point…

Where are the deac-oh, there they are, never mind. They were VERY restrained in their removal of these young…persons.
 
The article says:
The women caused outrage when they stormed on to the altar of Christ the Saviour Cathedral, and sang an obscenity-laced song that implored the Virgin Mary to “throw Putin out”.
Now to me, that is most definitely a hate crime. So if Russia has laws against hate crimes then they should be charged with one.
 
I just watched the video and I must say I am totally shocked by this sickening and blasphemous behavior of this band! :eek: I think they should all face prison time.
 
…oh, wee lamb… the point is WAAAAAAY back there. You missed it.

It is not the female body itself which is shameful, it’s the way the beauty of the femanine form has become a commodity that is a cause of shame. Women are expected to be objects that are only good for looking pretty.

And, on the main point…

Where are the deac-oh, there they are, never mind. They were VERY restrained in their removal of these young…persons.
I believe the word word you’re looking for is women.
Right;)

And women have always been heavily judged based on their looks, and all too often were literally a commodity (there are passages in the Old Testament about the proper way to sell your daughter into slavery).
 
The article says:
Quote:
The women caused outrage when they stormed on to the altar of Christ the Saviour Cathedral, and sang an obscenity-laced song that implored the Virgin Mary to “throw Putin out”.

Now to me, that is most definitely a hate crime. So if Russia has laws against hate crimes then they should be charged with one.
Am I the only one here who notices the element of standing up to a tyrant in this story?
 
Originally Posted by AngryAtheist8
This will be a good test of how theocratic Russia is becoming, and to what extent the Orthodox Church is a tool of the Russian State (or visa versa).

That’s depressing.
It sounds like Russia is reverting back to the strong church/state relationship it had under the Czars.
If that happens, don’t be surprised if they eventually come for the Catholics.
 
Am I the only one here who notices the element of standing up to a tyrant in this story?
That’s why we should support free speech, even if we don’t like what’s being said: because one day someone will try and shut us up.

BTW the article also says:
In court, Ms Tolokonnikova said that although they were pleading not guilty, that did not mean they were not prepared to apologise for the pain their performance in the cathedral had caused.
 
Am I the only one here who notices the element of standing up to a tyrant in this story?
I am against their imprisonment and this is partially to do with it. The fact of the matter is that Putin is a tyrant; this whole incident sounds like this band is being targeted more for opposing him than for anything else.

I despise the idea that people should be jailed simply for being disrespectful or for doing things that are in bad taste.
 
guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jul/31/god-is-judging-*****-riot
The three women have said they performed their anti-Putin “punk prayer” to protest against the decision of the leader of the Orthodox church, Patriarch Kirill, to openly support Putin in the lead-up to presidential elections in March. Chaplin denied any such support. The patriarch has repeatedly praised Putin and denounced protesters who have taken to the streets against him. In February, two weeks before ***** Riot’s performance, he called the Putin era “a miracle of God”.
If this is true then the Archbishop is acting as Putin’s Poodle (of the female gender).
 
…oh, wee lamb… the point is WAAAAAAY back there. You missed it.

It is not the female body itself which is shameful, it’s the way the beauty of the femanine form has become a commodity that is a cause of shame. Women are expected to be objects that are only good for looking pretty.
Femen’s message is a mixed one. On one hand, they are actively trying to get the Ukraine to put an end to the abusive prostitution and sex tourism that the Ukraine is becoming noted for, and to secure women a place in the public life of the Ukraine (good), but also are anti-religious, anti-government, and prone to excesses of hyperbole. That they use the one thing they have going for them - attractive female bodies - as a weapon to get the press to notice them (as well as politicians).

Femen has a tendency toward knee-jerk reaction to any public arrest involving the silencing of women with political messages… they support the arrested women.
 
Femen have also protested at the Vatican and this year’s European Football Championship. Illustrating the complete absurdity of feminism, they oppose the exploitation of women, by having a group of attractive young women expose there bodies in public.
There is one word to describe their absurdity:
Hypocrisy!
 
I kinda like Putin, or should I say more accurately, I sympathise with him on a number of issues. I think it’s good that Russia has a leader who will stand up to NATO and the West.
 
I kinda like Putin, or should I say more accurately, I sympathise with him on a number of issues. I think it’s good that Russia has a leader who will stand up to NATO and the West.
You and I agree on much! 👍
 
I kinda like Putin, or should I say more accurately, I sympathise with him on a number of issues. I think it’s good that Russia has a leader who will stand up to NATO and the West.
He is unlike the president of the Philippines, that’s for sure.
My country’s president loves to bend over backwards when it comes to emulating Western fads such as homosexism, contraception and divorce.
 
Not wanting to derail my own thread, but can’t help noticing the forum stars out the word ‘*****’ - what if someone’s just referring to their cat?
 
guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jul/31/god-is-judging-*****-riot

If this is true then the Archbishop is acting as Putin’s Poodle (of the female gender).
In that case, I would not only be against their arrest, but I support their message too (though not the way they displayed it). That is ridiculous.
Uhm, the alternative to Putin are the communists. I think I don’t need to tell anyone here that the Orthodox Church has had some negative experiences with the communists in the past, so of course they support Putin.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top