Salvation outside the church

  • Thread starter Thread starter Riley259
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I have the new catechism of the Catholic church and read it, but I would in no way put it ahead of the Bible, the Word of God, or the Holy Spirit. The Catechism is a very well-written and useful document, but I would not put any man-made document, no matter how “well-'written”, ahead of the Word of God.
Since you have the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Second Edition, please turn to page 689 which follows the last paragraph 2865. You will see the “Index of Citations”. Read the brief introduction about how to read this section.

Next you will see Sacred Scripture in bold, capital letters. From page 689 through the top of page 720, you will find the Scriptures which are part of the various paragraphs.

Here, in the Catechism, is the “Word of God” .

The “Word of God” is also found on many individual pages. Let your eyes wander down to the footnotes and there you can check the “Word of God” according to the listed book, chapter and verse . Hint. It is best to read above and below the citation in order to understand the context of the Scripture being presented.
 
Quoting awolbob:

Perhaps there is some confusion here about the definition of “Church”, or universal (catholic) church. Our current Pope has stated that the scattered [christian] churches must come back together for the sake of Christ’s mystical body (the Church) here on earth.

The Bible of the catholic (universal) church was codified around the 400’s AD in order to dispel heresies, which were many, and to give the whole church a valid manual from which to operate and teach. This compilation of letters and oral traditions are all the church has to go on with the guidance of the Holy Spirit. There may, from age to age, be different emphasis by each Pope in order to address the needs of each age. It was many many years until the first printing press made Bibles available to the laity. And that is when all the quarrelling really started. The Catechism was meant to inform and to dispell heresy, not to continue to divide Jesus’ Church.

The current catechism of the Church was meant, said its writer, for teachers and leaders, so they would teach a consistant doctrine. But bishops thought it to be so well-written, they ordered copies for their parishoners, too.

The christian faith, whether Catholic or protestant, is a gift from God. It is not for each one of us to posit under which title the true Body of Christ exists.
Greetings in Christ, awolbob,

I appreciate your thoughts here, and your gentle replies. I can see you have a grasp of the entire picture. I am more childlike in my approach, and enjoy learning.

For that reason, when I write that there is One Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, it is of course not because I have declared it so, and not in a spirit of personal superiority over other believers. (I am nothing in my small self) but I declare it the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic because Christ made it so.

He prayed so fervently before His Passion, “That all may be One.” At the Last Supper, many left Him because they could not believe His statement was literal, that they should feed on His Body and His Blood. “Many left Him.” after that, unable to believe.

Centuries later, few of these scattered “churches” teach the Real Presence, and this is the summit of our Faith.

True, The Church allows for “invincible ignorance,” and only God can judge the hearts of men. I do agree that in God’s Divine Mercy, He desires that all come to him in the fullness of His Church. In fullness, that is the key! All do not realize how glorious is that gift!

** A little analogy:** I think of the story of the Prodigal Son, who was outside the realm of his father’s house, having sinned greatly, having felt that he could not anticipate being anything but a servant. He somehow felt worthy enough to be just that, a servant. But his father would not hear of it! He declared to his son that he was not born to be his servant, but his son! Notice too that the “justified” son out in the fields would have gladly barred his Prodigal brother from his full inheritance. This is a lovely story, illustrating how the father had set the celebration and invited both sons to join him inside the house! And not to a simple meal, but to a banquet. That is the difference: The Church has prepared the Banquet of Christ’s Real Presence, here and now, and some want only to step back into something lesser. No Sacraments, no Saints, no veneration of Our Blessed Mother. A church, with a little c that although just as welcome to the banquet, seems not to know the fullness of what God has prepared for us, now and in eternity!

If others go to Heaven some other way, perhaps not being taught of the joy of full Communion with the Church, others of us realize now, at this moment, that they are drawn, they are absolutely longing for their Father’s lavish gifts of love, of Holy Communion, His Real Presence inside His Ark-like House, His Church. Why would we not want to go to Heaven as Christ’s Bride, His Holy Church?

Of course it is all too big for me to understand on a doctrinal level. I hope my analogy makes sense. You and others here have a good grasp of these things. Yet one thing I know is that even a child senses the different levels of joy offered, and with childlike faith, do we not all grasp for all God’s blessings?

I only know His Holy Church, and no other, gives me Sacraments, Magisterium, Catechism, Traditions and His Real Presence, and only with these can I even hope to make it to Heaven. Because I sinned more, I love more, in my pitiable state, as the scripture says. Maybe others feel perfectly acceptable in their own goodness to attain Heaven. I need His Holy Church and His Real Presence to have a hope of entering in.

The Church is the Bride of Christ. God our Father, in His Divine Mercy, has given us the Divine Continuity of Apostolic Succession. Christ handed the Keys to St. Peter, establishing The Chair of St. Peter, declaring that whatsoever Peter and his successors bound on earth would be bound in Heaven, and whatsoever they loosed on earth would be loosed in Heaven. This is a literal proclamation of power. The Catholic Church was THE ONLY Church for over 1500 years, before the “wicked schism” (words of St. Ambose of Milan.)" The gates of Hell will shall not prevail against it." This is the glory of the Church Christ gave us, knowing we would need all of His power to save us.

Many blessings,
Kathryn Ann

Wow, I don’t think anyone could have said it better. Thanks
 
When we are baptized, we join the church; we are bapized to be saved; therefore, when we join the church we join to be saved.:o
If water baptism saves us then Paul made a strange statement in 1 Cor. 1:17. The Lord Jesus Christ sent him, but “not to baptize…” In Eph. 4:4 Paul mentions “one baptism” in the Body of Christ. He tells us what this baptism is in 1 Cor. 12:13 where he notes that, “By ONE [Holy} Spirit we were all baptied into ONE Body.” Here the [Holy} Spirit is the baptizer and the Body of Christ is the element we are baptized into. This is plainly Holy Spirit [not water] baptism. It is quite different from the baptism at Pentecost where the Lord Jesus Christ is the baptizer and the Holy Spirit is the element. BTW, the Bible speaks of at least 12 different baptisms. Most are not water. Now Israel is to become a “kingdom of priest” in the future [Ex. 19:4,5 cf 1 Peter 2:9] and the initatory rite into this priesthood was water baptism [Ex. 29:4].
QC
 
The Church is the Bride of Christ.
Many blessings,
Kathryn Ann

Kathryn Ann: The phrase “Bride of Christ” is not found in Scripture. [Now I know that the word “Trinity” is also not found there, but the doctrine is.] The apostle to the Gentiles, Paul, writes to the Ephesians: Eph 2:15 Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace;
The “one new man,” in context, is plainly the Body of Christ.
Grace and Peace,
QC
 
Since you have the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Second Edition, please turn to page 689 which follows the last paragraph 2865. You will see the “Index of Citations”. Read the brief introduction about how to read this section.

Next you will see Sacred Scripture in bold, capital letters. From page 689 through the top of page 720, you will find the Scriptures which are part of the various paragraphs.

Here, in the Catechism, is the “Word of God” .

The “Word of God” is also found on many individual pages. Let your eyes wander down to the footnotes and there you can check the “Word of God” according to the listed book, chapter and verse . Hint. It is best to read above and below the citation in order to understand the context of the Scripture being presented.
Thank you for this excellent instruction on how to use the CCC.

I think my references to “Word of God” may have not fully communicated what I intended. I intended its use to imply the double meaning it has: first, as in the Gospel of John, I reference that the Word became flesh and dwelt among us (Jesus); second, as the codification of Old Testament books and new testament letters, which are the God-inspired words of God to man.

In attending Bible studies with a Conservative Baptist group, I was troubled that they believed the Word of God was limited to the words on the pages, rather than that the person of Jesus was God’s Word to man.

All of this discussion for me began when I read some commentary on this site that was arguing that there is no salvation outside the canonical Roman Catholic Church. Long before there were any catechisms or encyclicals, there were many Christians who had salvation. In these discussions on this site, there seems to be a circular argument that to be saved is to be Catholic with a capital "C"which is Roman Catholicism, rather than the small “c” which indicates Christ’s mystical body on earth.

Do Catholics not understand that they are Christians? Or do they think no Christian can exist outside the Roman Catholic Church? Golly, what about Eastern Orthodoxy which Pope Benedict XVI has recognized as valid, and certain parts of the Church of England who have been invited to reunite with the Catholic Church? Were these people “saved” or not?

I had this discussion 38 years ago in a class led by a Jesuit theologian. The Catholics back then didn’t seem to realize they were Christians. The theologian was having this same difficulty with his class’s grasp of who they are in Christ.

…more later.
 
Thank you for this excellent instruction on how to use the CCC.

I think my references to “Word of God” may have not fully communicated what I intended. I intended its use to imply the double meaning it has: first, as in the Gospel of John, I reference that the Word became flesh and dwelt among us (Jesus); second, as the codification of Old Testament books and new testament letters, which are the God-inspired words of God to man.
You are welcome.

I cannot remember when I first learned the meaning of “Word of God” as being Jesus Christ. I do remember that my reaction was --Wow! That really makes sense.

There is a great paragraph in the Catechism which you would enjoy. It is paragraph 65 – but first I need to direct you to the instructions about the smaller print.

Please go to page 11 where it says “Practical Directions for Using This Catechism”
This section is paragraphs 18 - 22. CCC 20 & 21 refers to the use of small print.

A couple more points about the Catechsim. The numbers in the margins are cross-references which take you to related paragraphs. The Glossary starting on page 864 is handy when one needs to describe something. My personal complaint about the Glossary is that I wish it had more items. Still, I am happy with it.
 
TOr do they think no Christian can exist outside the Roman Catholic Church?
Firstly, the Church is not Roman, bob. The Roman (or Latin) rite is only 1 of 20-ish rites in the Catholic Church, all loyal to the Bishop of Rome.

Secondly, the Catholic Church teaches that all baptized Christians are member of our Church, although some may be imperfectly joined.
I had this discussion 38 years ago in a class led by a Jesuit theologian. The Catholics back then didn’t seem to realize they were Christians. The theologian was having this same difficulty with his class’s grasp of who they are in Christ.
…more later.
There are indeed some poorly catechized Catholics. And Jesuit theologians are not exempt from this category. :sad_yes:
 
Greetings in Christ, awolbob,

I appreciate your thoughts here, and your gentle replies. I can see you have a grasp of the entire picture. I am more childlike in my approach, and enjoy learning.

For that reason, when I write that there is One Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, it is of course not because I have declared it so, and not in a spirit of personal superiority over other believers. (I am nothing in my small self) but I declare it the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic because Christ made it so.

He prayed so fervently before His Passion, “That all may be One.” At the Last Supper, many left Him because they could not believe His statement was literal, that they should feed on His Body and His Blood. “Many left Him.” after that, unable to believe.

Centuries later, few of these scattered “churches” teach the Real Presence, and this is the summit of our Faith.

True, The Church allows for “invincible ignorance,” and only God can judge the hearts of men. I do agree that in God’s Divine Mercy, He desires that all come to him in the fullness of His Church. In fullness, that is the key! All do not realize how glorious is that gift!

** A little analogy:** I think of the story of the Prodigal Son, who was outside the realm of his father’s house, having sinned greatly, having felt that he could not anticipate being anything but a servant. He somehow felt worthy enough to be just that, a servant. But his father would not hear of it! He declared to his son that he was not born to be his servant, but his son! Notice too that the “justified” son out in the fields would have gladly barred his Prodigal brother from his full inheritance. This is a lovely story, illustrating how the father had set the celebration and invited both sons to join him inside the house! And not to a simple meal, but to a banquet. That is the difference: The Church has prepared the Banquet of Christ’s Real Presence, here and now, and some want only to step back into something lesser. No Sacraments, no Saints, no veneration of Our Blessed Mother. A church, with a little c that although just as welcome to the banquet, seems not to know the fullness of what God has prepared for us, now and in eternity!

If others go to Heaven some other way, perhaps not being taught of the joy of full Communion with the Church, others of us realize now, at this moment, that they are drawn, they are absolutely longing for their Father’s lavish gifts of love, of Holy Communion, His Real Presence inside His Ark-like House, His Church. Why would we not want to go to Heaven as Christ’s Bride, His Holy Church?

Of course it is all too big for me to understand on a doctrinal level. I hope my analogy makes sense. You and others here have a good grasp of these things. Yet one thing I know is that even a child senses the different levels of joy offered, and with childlike faith, do we not all grasp for all God’s blessings?

I only know His Holy Church, and no other, gives me Sacraments, Magisterium, Catechism, Traditions and His Real Presence, and only with these can I even hope to make it to Heaven. Because I sinned more, I love more, in my pitiable state, as the scripture says. Maybe others feel perfectly acceptable in their own goodness to attain Heaven. I need His Holy Church and His Real Presence to have a hope of entering in.

The Church is the Bride of Christ. God our Father, in His Divine Mercy, has given us the Divine Continuity of Apostolic Succession. Christ handed the Keys to St. Peter, establishing The Chair of St. Peter, declaring that whatsoever Peter and his successors bound on earth would be bound in Heaven, and whatsoever they loosed on earth would be loosed in Heaven. This is a literal proclamation of power. The Catholic Church was THE ONLY Church for over 1500 years, before the “wicked schism” (words of St. Ambose of Milan.)" The gates of Hell will shall not prevail against it." This is the glory of the Church Christ gave us, knowing we would need all of His power to save us.

Many blessings,
Kathryn Ann
Wow, I don’t think anyone could have said it better. Thanks

You’re most welcome, St. Donatus, and all blessings to you in Christ!
Kathryn Ann
:heaven:
 
The Church is the Bride of Christ.
Many blessings,
Kathryn Ann
Kathryn Ann: The phrase “Bride of Christ” is not found in Scripture. [Now I know that the word “Trinity” is also not found there, but the doctrine is.] The apostle to the Gentiles, Paul, writes to the Ephesians: Eph 2:15 Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace;
The “one new man,” in context, is plainly the Body of Christ.
Grace and Peace,
QC

QuickCat, we need not worry -The Holy Father, Pope Benedict XVI, teaches the long held tradition, relating to St. Paul’s words comparing husband and wife to Christ and the Church, and The Pope confirms that the Church is the Bride of Christ:* The Body is The Bride. * It is a mystic and beautiful **relationship **that The Pope confirms.

catholicnewsagency.com/news/pope_explores_st._pauls_teaching_on_the_church_as_bride_of_christ/

Catholics are not bound by “sola scripture”, but even so, there is no doubt in the book of Ephesians, fifth chapter, that Paul is making the comparison. As you say, the word Trinity is also not an exact wording in scripture, but is the teaching and tradition of the Church. The Body, the Church** has a special relationship** to Christ as His Bride.

The link above explains this beautifully. We must all understand why the relationship is compared to a husband and wife. Christ is to be thought of as a loving spouse. We are to respond accordingly, in anticipation of His return as our Royal Groom, and what awaits us in Heaven. There is a poetic mystery in all this that is missed if we speak of “Body” without the espoused relationship. For this reason, those taking Holy Vows are spoken of as being espoused to Christ. Yet we all are, and that is the joyful mystery.

In a world and in a time when mere physicality without love often reigns, how perfectly wonderful it is to be reminded that The Church is espoused to Christ. We are indeed in the most loving, sublime, anticipatory relationship to Him. Knowing that “perfect love casts out all fear,” is another thing to remember. In a frightening world, we know we have a most loving God, who is “closer than a brother.”

Without an understanding of this* special relationship*, we could not comprehend the fullness of His desire to commune with us on every level or be calmed in times of distress. Every bride knows this feeling of delightful anticipation, instead of mere existence or fear. We know Whose we are, and that we are His beloveds in the most sacred covenant, united in His love.

In Christ’s love,
Kathryn Ann
 
If it hasn’t already been responded to, The CCC was given the Imprimi Potest in 1994 by then Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger. The pope in 1994 as you know was JPII.
The exhortation work of Pope Benedict XVI to which I meant to refer is Verbum Domini, part I, Interpretation of Sacred Scripture in the Church, The Bible and Ecumenism, paragraph 46, which encourages ecumenism. This is a “must read” document from end to end. I think I had improperly referred to this Exhortation as an Encyclical.
 
I believe it is necessary to reflect on the different contexts in which Christ taught on a particular issue, when they appear to conflict. When he spoke generally, it seems that he always spoke in extreme terms. I don’t believe that that is overstating it. He did so, of course, as is to be expected, for the best of reasons, namely, our inveterate determination to find the thin end of a wedge, to water down his teaching, to find some recourse that will enable us to backslide. The Church understands this when she teaches us the Act of Contrition. ‘I resolve never to sin again.’

On the other hand, when within a particular context, or addressing a particular context, Christ appeared to revert to his teaching concerning the aim of all religion worthy of the name, namely, charity, love, as the absolutely paramount, overriding consideration. And perhaps nowhere is this contrast between Christ’s uncompromisingly stern, general precepts and those adverting to the Charity, to God’s loving forgiveness (yes, sometimes tough love is necessary, as well, I know), than when he states God’s priority in judging us at the Last Judgment, as described by himself in Matthew’s Gospel.

It was in relation to this, that Vatican II sought to remedy the grievous imbalance created by the legalists of the Tridentine church. There will, indeed, be a terrible judgment of those who took no account of our humanity, “setting loads on people’s backs they would not have lifted a finger to bear, themselves”. Encyclicals aside, in the context, academic treatises, it did precious little to render political support to any remedying of the massive, structural injustice in our putatively Christian societies, thereby enabling ambitious atheists the opportunity to use the second commandment as a political front, to create Communism, and enable militant atheists also to take over the Labour party, after Keir Hardie’s day (a Methodist lay-preacher), while themselves living in a very comfortable symbiosis with the fascist ‘beasts of the earth’ of the Iberian Peninsula and South America. Franz Jaegstetter’s bishop told him he was being proud for opposing Hitler, Franz, imo, being arguably the greatest saint and martyr of the 20th century.

The tragedy - if it makes any sense to talk in such terms, when we know that God’s providence is never derailed – is that liberals (a strange designation, since freedom demands responsibility) within the Church have sought to use Vatican II to garner cheap popularity, at the expense of the indispensable bedrock, the unchangeable teachings of scripture and Catholic tradition on the most fundamental issues. And while the Church’s ‘throne-room’ mindset has, to an extent, been superseded by inculcation of an awareness of the nature of every human-being as an only-begotten of the Father, (celebrating the Mass does not confer superiority in that regard to the celebrant), it is said by people who used to attend Mass in those days, that there has been a decrease in prayerful piety – again, the baby being thrown out with the bath-water).

It is clearly implied by Christ’s own description of the Last Judgment, the only such description in the whole of scripture, that while formal religious commitment is an aid, a priceless aid, like the scripture and tradition that informs it, it is not the ‘sine qua non’ that he taught when speaking in general terms. Selfless love, alone, is the sine qua non, which he expressly reiterated on a few occasions.

Another example of this apparent ambiguity is to be found in Christ’s attitude to the woman caught in adultery. The fact is that those draconian Mosaic sanctions, such as stoning for adultery, were instituted for a people who had seen God’s performance of major miracles on their behalf. By Christ’s day, The Synagogue had evidently deteriorated badly, and it had been a long time since they had seen a prophet with the public status of those of olden times, and it accordingly met with Christ’s fury.

Christ’s merciful perspective, warranted by the larger picture, was not something that filled the hard-hearted gate-keepers of their orthodoxy, who had perverted it with the more mean-spirited, often entirely gratuitous and selective traditions of men. But it seems to be a common theme throughout Christ’s ministry, particularly in relation to the religious authorities. But he never yielded an inch in his general teaching, whether it concerned, sex, ambition, riches, turning the other cheek, etc. Not an inch.

Had Vatican II taken place and been embraced in the twenties, the fascist regimes in Europe would would almost certainly not have risen to power, nor those in the Americas and elsewhere. WWII would have been avoided, and of course, the Holocaust.
 
If water baptism saves us then Paul made a strange statement in 1 Cor. 1:17. The Lord Jesus Christ sent him, but “not to baptize…” In Eph. 4:4 Paul mentions “one baptism” in the Body of Christ. He tells us what this baptism is in 1 Cor. 12:13 where he notes that, “By ONE [Holy} Spirit we were all baptied into ONE Body.” Here the [Holy} Spirit is the baptizer and the Body of Christ is the element we are baptized into. This is plainly Holy Spirit [not water] baptism. It is quite different from the baptism at Pentecost where the Lord Jesus Christ is the baptizer and the Holy Spirit is the element. BTW, the Bible speaks of at least 12 different baptisms. Most are not water. Now Israel is to become a “kingdom of priest” in the future [Ex. 19:4,5 cf 1 Peter 2:9] and the initatory rite into this priesthood was water baptism [Ex. 29:4].
QC
Baptism does not save anyone.
Baptism is necessary for salvation but not sufficient. You must be baptised, Catholic, and die in a state of grace to be saved.
 
I have been trying to convert my mom (and she’s starting RCIA in the fall:D). I was explaining that no one can be saved outside of the Catholic Church, not to scare her but to let her know how serious it is to be a part of Christ’s true Church.
It’s my understanding that we do not know who is saved by invincible ignorance so teaching outside of the Church there is no salvation is not wrong…which the Church teaches so it can’t be wrong anyways. I truly believe that we need to try our best to convert Protestants. I think they are more open now that in the past, at least the ones I have talked to. Protestants teach heretical things and why would we not want to help them and bring them to Christ’s Church? I think not doing that is a travesty, now days we seem to be so keen on being PC we don’t want to share the truth.
 
Baptism does not save anyone.
Baptism is necessary for salvation but not sufficient. You must be baptised, Catholic, and die in a state of grace to be saved.
You are right - [water] baptism does not save us. But you fail to mention that the only way to salvation is to “believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved.” There is no denial that Peter and the eleven were sent to baptize in order to prepare the nation of Israel to become a kingdom of priests in the coming earthly kingdom. But Paul says that he wasn’t sent to baptize. Why? Becasue he is the apostle to us Gentiles - Romans 11:13.
QC
 
You are right - [water] baptism does not save us. But you fail to mention that the only way to salvation is to “believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved.” There is no denial that Peter and the eleven were sent to baptize in order to prepare the nation of Israel to become a kingdom of priests in the coming earthly kingdom. But Paul says that he wasn’t sent to baptize. Why? Becasue he is the apostle to us Gentiles - Romans 11:13.
QC
Obviously, Paul believed in Baptism:
But about midnight Paul and Silas were praying and singing hymns to God, and the prisoners were listening to them, and suddenly there was a great earthquake, so that the foundations of the prison were shaken; and immediately all the doors were opened and every one’s fetters were unfastened. When the jailer woke and saw that the prison doors were open, he drew his sword and was about to kill himself, supposing that the prisoners had escaped. But Paul cried with a loud voice, “Do not harm yourself, for we are all here.” And he called for lights and rushed in, and trembling with fear he fell down before Paul and Silas, and brought them out and said, “Men, what must I do to be saved?” And they said, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household.” And they spoke the word of the Lord to him and to all that were in his house. And he took them the same hour of the night, and washed their wounds, and he was baptized at once, with all his family. Then he brought them up into his house, and set food before them; and he rejoiced with all his household that he had believed in God. (Acts 16:25-34)
 
You are right - [water] baptism does not save us. But you fail to mention that the only way to salvation is to** “believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved.”** There is no denial that Peter and the eleven were sent to baptize in order to prepare the nation of Israel to become a kingdom of priests in the coming earthly kingdom. But Paul says that he wasn’t sent to baptize. Why? Becasue he is the apostle to us Gentiles - Romans 11:13.
QC
NO. Believing is not sufficient. Faith alone does not save you.
 
I have been trying to convert my mom (and she’s starting RCIA in the fall:D). I was explaining that no one can be saved outside of the Catholic Church, not to scare her but to let her know how serious it is to be a part of Christ’s true Church.
It’s my understanding that we do not know who is saved by invincible ignorance so teaching outside of the Church there is no salvation is not wrong…which the Church teaches so it can’t be wrong anyways. I truly believe that we need to try our best to convert Protestants. I think they are more open now that in the past, at least the ones I have talked to. Protestants teach heretical things and why would we not want to help them and bring them to Christ’s Church? I think not doing that is a travesty, now days we seem to be so keen on being PC we don’t want to share the truth.
What a blessing for you. Keep encouraging her and study your Bible with her showing her how the Bible and Christ pointed to his organization, the Catholic Church. My wife is not a Catholic and I am afraid, not open to it at all, but time will tell. God Bless you and your efforts with your Mother.
 
What a blessing for you. Keep encouraging her and study your Bible with her showing her how the Bible and Christ pointed to his organization, the Catholic Church. My wife is not a Catholic and I am afraid, not open to it at all, but time will tell. God Bless you and your efforts with your Mother.
Thank you:thumbsup: I really appreciate that, I will be praying for your wife that she “sees the light” lol.
Along with my mom, two of my friends and my younger brother are all starting RCIA in the Fall, and one of my friends who is a non-practicing Catholic is planning on coming back, as well as another friend who has started looking into the Church. The thing that I have found is that people want the truth, but they don’t seem to know what it is. the way that I worded it to my mom was that she has all this faith that she places in the government and in the man-made world, yet she doesn’t have the faith that Christ established ONE Church (this really got her thinking). I also think its very important to know about your faith so that people will see you truly believe and you truly know, and not that its just your opinion that you believe the Catholic Church is the true Church, but you have 2,000 years of history and teachings to prove it.
If I can get my mom who is/was a hardcore church of Christ (cabellite) to come to RCIA through truth, then ANYONE can do it haha. So good luck and i’ll be praying for you!
 
Thank you:thumbsup: I really appreciate that, I will be praying for your wife that she “sees the light” lol.
Along with my mom, two of my friends and my younger brother are all starting RCIA in the Fall, and one of my friends who is a non-practicing Catholic is planning on coming back, as well as another friend who has started looking into the Church. The thing that I have found is that people want the truth, but they don’t seem to know what it is. the way that I worded it to my mom was that she has all this faith that she places in the government and in the man-made world, yet she doesn’t have the faith that Christ established ONE Church (this really got her thinking). I also think its very important to know about your faith so that people will see you truly believe and you truly know, and not that its just your opinion that you believe the Catholic Church is the true Church, but you have 2,000 years of history and teachings to prove it.
If I can get my mom who is/was a hardcore church of Christ (cabellite) to come to RCIA through truth, then ANYONE can do it haha. So good luck and i’ll be praying for you!
Maybe you can give me some pointers. I think I know most of the teachings of the Church quite well, but handling these issues with someone that is violently (or mildly) opposed to the Catholic Church just starts arguments. I think your point about the Government and this system is quite good for most people but my wife, a Jehovah’s Witness, has no faith in government or this man-made world. They just have faith in the Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Any ideas?

By the way, maybe a little more on this reasoning. I have some family that have left and I am encouraging to come back.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top