Salvation

  • Thread starter Thread starter oneseeker
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
So Adam and Eve, by their free will, had the power to ruin their union with God. They were, by your definition, already perfect as God had created them at that point. So we, who are not, don’t?
Yes, Adam and Eve truly had free will before they fell into sin, and they were created good–they had no evil nature before they ate the fruit…yet they sinned and lost their freedom. If Adam and Eve, who were created good, were not able to use their freedom wisely, how can you or I do better than them with a sinful will that is hostile toward God?
 
The herion users original choice to use herion was an act of free will, as was the smokers. Are you saying God predestined them to be this?
At what point did the heroin addict or the heavy smoker no longer have free will to stop using the stuff?
 
As** I’ve already pointed out**, it is not unusual for God to admonish or even command of us something that is impossible for mankind to do. See Mark 10:21 “Go, sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”
It **might be possible **for some people at certain times to be willing to sell all of their possessions and give their money to the poor.
Does anybody else see this contradiction?

What is it Nick does God command of us something that is impossible or possible?
What do sinners want? They want to sin. What does God require of us for salvation? He requires absolute perfection in all righteousness. But we are all sinners. How can we be saved? Can we change ourselves so that we can begin to love what (who) is truly good? Jesus said, “you must be born again.”
YOU want to sin?

I can tell you up front I DO NOT WANT TO SIN

Nick you need to surrender your disordered desires to Christ and let him transform them.”

YOU DONT have to SIN and YOU SHOULD not WANT to sin.
I’m quite capable in my flesh, of becoming extremely worldly, and following after worldly things instead of following Jesus.
WE all know where scripture says this will get you. and you might need the shades :cool:
 
If we can “obey” our way out of sin and into righteousness, doesn’t this make us our own saviors? Isn’t this living under the law and not under grace?
Does this make us our own saviors? Well… think about this: Jesus said, “I am the vine, you are the branches.” “Without Me, you can do nothing.” Of course with Jesus, we can do much.
Jesus said, “A branch that does not produce fruit will be cut off, it will dry up, and be cast into the fire.”

So, Christians MUST produce fruit in order to not be cast into the fire. Of course a branch does not produce fruit by itself, it does it by union with the vine. Christians produce fruit, therefore, by union with Jesus.
 
It might be possible for some people at certain times to be willing to sell all of their possessions and give their money to the poor. As it turned out, this rich man (in Mark chapter 10) was not willing to do so. And are you any better than him? I know I’m not. Although I may never struggle with a love of money or an unhealthy sexual attraction, or a drug addiction, there are numerous other ways that I can, and DO, fail to seek first the kingdom. I’m quite capable in my flesh, of becoming extremely worldly, and following after worldly things instead of following Jesus.
It might be possible for some people to be willing to? Or it is possible that they do it? Please understand here that I’m not talking about whether or not they should, or if God is requiring it, etc. You said that it was not possible, so now you’re saying it is?
 
Yes, Adam and Eve truly had free will before they fell into sin, and they were created good–they had no evil nature before they ate the fruit…yet they sinned and lost their freedom. If Adam and Eve, who were created good, were not able to use their freedom wisely, how can you or I do better than them with a sinful will that is hostile toward God?
My question is this: If Adam and Eve, who had no evil nature as you claim etc., could lose their salvation by an act of their free will, then why can’t we?
 
Originally Posted by Nick Jones
As I’ve already pointed out, it is not unusual for God to admonish or even command of us something that is impossible for mankind to do. See Mark 10:21 “Go, sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Jones
It might be possible for some people at certain times to be willing to sell all of their possessions and give their money to the poor.

Does anybody else see this contradiction?

:yup:
 
Jesus came to save people from the ditch. Through the spilling of his blood, Jesus rescues us from the ditch. You can be assured that when Jesus rescues someone from the ditch, they are rescued from the ditch.

That is the good news. Though we have fallen into a ditch, Jesus’ work on the cross brings our rescue to completeness. Jesus’ rescue is complete.
Yes, we are rescued from the ditch, but that doesn’t mean we won’t go and get hit by a truck while crossing the street.

It’s like the little girl who fell down the well. She was completely incapable of getting out by herself. However, she looked up and saw her father looking down at her. And because of her faith in her father, she thought, “I"m saved!” even though as a matter of fact, she was still down at the bottom of the well. Her father, to save her, lowers a bucket down the well, and tells her to get in. She, being a little girl, can climb in. But, she has to climb in, herself. Her father cannot make her do it. She has to cooperate with the instructions of her father. He then raises her up. Did the little girl save herself? No. Her father did it. BUT, did she cooperate, did she contribute in some way? Yes. And that is the way with our Heavenly Father. He saves us, but we must cooperate. Works, if you want to call it that.
As a footnote, the little girl was saved, but it’s still possible she might get lost in the woods.
 
It appears that you still haven’t come to terms with the nature of fallen unregenerate mankind, and hence, the nature of saving grace. I’ll make another attempt to explain it.
We have come to terms, but it is on the basis of what the Apostles taught, rather than what Calvin taught. 🤷
We sin because we are sinners. Sinners DO only what is in their nature to do. God, being goodness itself, DOES only what is in His nature to do.
The problem is that our nature is fallen, but not destroyed. The gifts and the call of God are irrevocable, therefore, when He created man in His image, and called him “good”, this capacity for goodness is not “taken back” by God. In fact, Jesus points out that, in spite of the fact that they are fallen men, they can still want good gifts for their children.
Now if sinners cannot change their very nature–if we can’t transform ourselves into something other than what we already are, then we are, as Scripture says, “prisoners of sin.”
Ahh, but being a “prisoner” by defintition means that someone is held against their will. That in us that longs for God does not stop longing just because we are fallen.
What do sinners want? They want to sin. What does God require of us for salvation? He requires absolute perfection in all righteousness. But we are all sinners. How can we be saved? Can we change ourselves so that we can begin to love what (who) is truly good? Jesus said, “you must be born again.”
Indeed! except that I will also add that some sinners want salvation. 👍
How would you characterize “spiritually dead” if not by being incapable of anything other than transgressions and sins?
We can clearly see in the case of Cornelius that persons can engage in actions that are pleasing to God before they are born again. This is grace. The scripture says “your alms have gone up to heaven”. Jesus is talking to the spiritually dead when He tells them that they want to feed their children well. This proves that even fallen men are capable of doing something besides transgression an sin.
I agree. To be hostile to God, you have to be in at least some sort of relationship with Him, and the relationship dead unregenerate sinners have with God is that they (unregenerate sinners) are objects of wrath in God’s sight.
Hence, their need for a saviour. 👍
How would you characterize “spiritually dead” if not by being incapable of anything other than transgressions and sins?

I agree. To be hostile to God, you have to be in at least some sort of relationship with Him, and the relationship dead unregenerate sinners have with God is that they (unregenerate sinners) are objects of wrath in God’s sight.
How would you characterize “spiritually dead” if not by being incapable of anything other than transgressions and sins?
Nick Jones;3532015:
The nature of fallen unregenerate mankind is such that the only kind of free gift that can possibly save him is one that is not in any way
dependent upon his own goodness in making the gift effectual, for the unregenerate sinner has no goodness with which to accept or cooperate with God’s grace.

I agree with this entirely. I think you are making a mistake when you say that choosing to accept the grace God pours out has anything to do with man’s innate “goodness”. In fact, I think the opposite is true. One is much more likely to see that one needs a saviour if one is drownding in sin.
 
Yes, Adam and Eve truly had free will before they fell into sin, and they were created good–they had no evil nature before they ate the fruit…yet they sinned and lost their freedom. If Adam and Eve, who were created good, were not able to use their freedom wisely, how can you or I do better than them with a sinful will that is hostile toward God?
Thats what Christ came for my friend. He wants us to change our hearts. He wants us to Love as he. And he came to show us how to truly be MAN. Because Jesus was fully MAN indeed.

Simple answer He gives us the Grace to do it
 
It might be possible for some people to be willing to? Or it is possible that they do it? Please understand here that I’m not talking about whether or not they should, or if God is requiring it, etc. You said that it was not possible, so now you’re saying it is?
What God requires of ALL of us (to inherit eternal life) is perfect righteousness. Jesus told the rich man, “Go, sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”

The rich man apparently loved his wealth too much to do what Jesus told him to do. The moral of this story would have been no different if an alcoholic would have asked Jesus, “Good teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” Jesus might have said, “throw out all of your wine, quit drinking, and help those who are enslaved to alcohol. Then come, follow me.”

Is it really that hard to see that, what is possible for some people is impossible for others, and that Jesus, who knows you intimately, could be asking you (right now, if you can hear Him) to do what you find impossible to do? How are you any better off than the rich man?
 
What is it Nick does God command of us something that is impossible or possible?
If you are able to keep ALL of the commands, then you have nothing to worry about…which ones can you keep?
 
The problem is that our nature is fallen, but not destroyed.
It is for God alone to judge whether or not a fallen and sinful nature is “destroyed.” Since God is HOLY and He cannot even look upon sin, you might want to ask yourself this question:

if having a mind that is hostile to God doesn’t mean our nature is destroyed, what would it take for our nature to be destroyed in God’s sight?
The gifts and the call of God are irrevocable, therefore, when He created man in His image, and called him “good”, this capacity for goodness is not “taken back” by God.
It wasn’t God who made them evil, it was their own fault. If Adam and Eve didn’t become evil, then why were Adam and Eve banned from the garden after they fell?
 
Then why don’t you tell a heroin addict that he is just as FREE to not use heroin as anyone is. Try telling a heavy smoker that he is
just as FREE to do without cigarettes as anyone is. Go ahead! Don’t be shy! If you really are a humanist, (we all have perfect control of our own will) then take your message out to those who need to hear it! Tell everyone that:
Because Catholicism is not humanism. We also, (those of us trained in the field of addictions) know that herion and nicotine change the brain chemistry, thwarting the ability to choose. Sin does not take away our ability to choose. Our fallen state causes us to tend toward making choices that go against God’s plan for our lives.
Yes. Death is a complete change of the person, and God warned Adam and Eve not to eat the fruit or they will surely die.
I agree about physical death, but the text clearly shows that this was not what happened. Why, in Deut. Do we see God placing a choice before the people, and asking them to choose life, if this is not possible?
When Jesus told the rich man to sell all of his possessions and give the money to the poor, is it because Jesus wanted the rich man to be poor too? No, Jesus wasn’t troubled by the rich man’s wealth, He was troubled by the rich man’s love of his wealth.

The point of the story is that all of us love certain worldly things more than we should. Jesus wasn’t trying to teach that rich people are evil, or that rich people need to become poor in order to be saved. Jesus was teaching that none of us can do what is required for salvation. Every person has worldly desires and worldly attachments that are keeping us from following Christ. For the rich man, it happened to be his wealth.
I agree entirely. And the rich man chose not to accept the grace Jesus was offering.
It might be possible for some people at certain times to be willing to sell all of their possessions and give their money to the poor. As it turned out, this rich man (in Mark chapter 10) was not willing to do so. And are you any better than him? I know I’m not. Although I may never struggle with a love of money or an unhealthy sexual attraction, or a drug addiction, there are numerous other ways that I can, and DO, fail to seek first the kingdom. I’m quite capable in my flesh, of becoming extremely worldly, and following after worldly things instead of following Jesus.
I agree. It is only by cooperating with God, whose grace is at work within us to will and to do his good pleasure, can we be confromed to the image and likeness of God. What you describe as the tendency to follow worldly things Catholics call “concupiscence”, which is the result of the fall. It does not mean we can’t choose, it just means that our choices tend to be “hostile to God”.
 
What God requires of ALL of us (to inherit eternal life) is perfect righteousness. Jesus told the rich man, “Go, sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”

The rich man apparently loved his wealth too much to do what Jesus told him to do. The moral of this story would have been no different if an alcoholic would have asked Jesus, “Good teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” Jesus might have said, “throw out all of your wine, quit drinking, and help those who are enslaved to alcohol. Then come, follow me.”

Is it really that hard to see that, what is possible for some people is impossible for others, and that Jesus, who knows you intimately, could be asking you (right now, if you can hear Him) to do what you find impossible to do? How are you any better off than the rich man?
I don’t think I’m any better than the rich man. YOU said that it is impossible for man to do this. I said it was not impossible. I did not say I would, or would be able to find the strength to. And I don’t think Jesus is using His commands as examples of what “some” people are not capable of doing in order to show them that it is impossible for them to please God in any way. I think He very clearly states that you must be born again (in WATER) and I think that He, then, commands what we must cooperate with in His grace that He freely gave us when we were born again.

I have to say that I’m really starting to get offended that you keep asking me if I think I’m better than so and so. I’m offended that you’re not even attempting to comprehend what I’m saying. And when we come so close that you almost have to, b/c you’re faltering so much in your arguments (throwing out false definitions of words like free that fit your meanings, and when we prove otherwise, going back to your blanket statements about the Church, claiming it’s impossible to do something and when we say otherwise, saying that we think we’re better than others just b/c we think it’s possible, which you just admitted above that it is), you completely shut off any reasoning and start slinging accusations at us and the Church.
 
Yes, Adam and Eve truly had free will before they fell into sin, and they were created good–they had no evil nature before they ate the fruit…yet they sinned and lost their freedom. If Adam and Eve, who were created good, were not able to use their freedom wisely, how can you or I do better than them with a sinful will that is hostile toward God?
This is a misunderstanding about the nature of man. If man was not capable if evil in the first place, he could not make an evil choice!

However, I agree with you that we cannot hope to do better with a mind hostile toward God. The will, in itself, however, is neither good or bad. It is the human faculty that enables us to make choices. What makes the outcome good or bad is the nature of what is chosen. As ST. Paul says, “I can will what is right to do, but I cannot do it.”
At what point did the heroin addict or the heavy smoker no longer have free will to stop using the stuff?
This is kinda off topic, but I think you are trying to liken sin to addiction. Once the chemistry of the brain is sufficiently altered, the person becomes physically dependent. This is called “loss of control” and is what medically defines addiction.
What God requires of ALL of us (to inherit eternal life) is perfect righteousness. Jesus told the rich man, “Go, sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”

The rich man apparently loved his wealth too much to do what Jesus told him to do. The moral of this story would have been no different if an alcoholic would have asked Jesus, “Good teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” Jesus might have said, “throw out all of your wine, quit drinking, and help those who are enslaved to alcohol. Then come, follow me.”

Is it really that hard to see that, what is possible for some people is impossible for others, and that Jesus, who knows you intimately, could be asking you (right now, if you can hear Him) to do what you find impossible to do? How are you any better off than the rich man?
True, but you seem to leave grace out of the story. If either the rich man or the addict are obedient to God’s command, he will pour His grace into their lives and make it possible for them to accomplish what He has commanded. 👍
 
I’ve never said that he had to start.
No, you claimed that once he was fully addicted, he lost his free will. Even if that is true, my point is that the original decision, that got him into addiction, was an act of his free will. So it’s not a loss, really, but a willful relinquishing of his will!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top