Anyone know if Pelosi has publicly commented? I wonder what she’s going to say about the Archbishop’s reply?Exactly! I just can not believe that Pelosi.
s3.amazonaws.com/aktest-2011/images/ArchbishopLetter_06102014_Final_2_pm.pdfNOM has a long and well-documented history of publishing material that connects homosexuality with pedophilia and incest and falsely suggests that gays and lesbians are trying to “inculcate children.” Likewise, the Family Research Council, which is co-sponsoring the event, has been designated a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center because of their vitriolic rhetoric; recently, a spokesperson for FRC blamed the growing acceptance of marriage for same sex couples for the Isla Vista mass shootings.
Sorry - I don’t buy your words of caution. That’s an old tactic of the gay lobby and the left to stifle debate: label opposition as a “hate group.” How does one prove they don’t “hate”? It’s an unfair smear of an organization that is trying to defend traditional marriage. As others have pointed out, there are numerous other organizations who are co-sponsors - it’s unfair to defame the entire event because of the dubious belief that one of the sponsors is “paranoid.” Wouldn’t gay parents seek to inculcate their children in the values of the gay agenda? Just like traditional parents might inculcate their children into believing in traditional values? I don’t see the controversey there. In any case, this story is about the resolute steadfastness of an archbishop in the face of pressure from pelosi and the gay left agenda. Sorry to see any catholic be sympathetic to the gay lobby and it’s smears.Amid all the clapping and high-fiving, we should also remember why folks have publicly asked Archbishop Cordileone not to attend the NOM rally:
s3.amazonaws.com/aktest-2011/images/ArchbishopLetter_06102014_Final_2_pm.pdf
There may be many things wrong with the arguments given by those asking the archbishop not to speak – but the above universally should be seen as ignorant and in the realm of paranoia. When an organization ultimately supports the Church’s position but champions it through assertions like these, it may be wise to step away from it.
I would suggest that the real reason they don’t want the Archbishop to attend is that they oppose the idea of traditional marriage only and to get the Archbishop to boycott the rally would be tantamount to getting the Church to agree with their position. I personally think that all the fuss about the FRC is just a smoke screen.Amid all the clapping and high-fiving, we should also remember why folks have publicly asked Archbishop Cordileone not to attend the NOM rally:
Agreed. I wouldn’t attend the rally.Amid all the clapping and high-fiving, we should also remember why folks have publicly asked Archbishop Cordileone not to attend the NOM rally:
s3.amazonaws.com/aktest-2011/images/ArchbishopLetter_06102014_Final_2_pm.pdf
There may be many things wrong with the arguments given by those asking the archbishop not to speak – but the above universally should be seen as ignorant and in the realm of paranoia. When an organization ultimately supports the Church’s position but champions it through assertions like these, it may be wise to step away from it.
So legalized same-sex marriage and God’s wrath against it are responsible for a mass shooting?Sorry - I don’t buy your words of caution. That’s an old tactic of the gay lobby and the left to stifle debate: label opposition as a “hate group.” How does one prove they don’t “hate”? It’s an unfair smear of an organization that is trying to defend traditional marriage. As others have pointed out, there are numerous other organizations who are co-sponsors - it’s unfair to defame the entire event because of the dubious belief that one of the sponsors is “paranoid.” Wouldn’t gay parents seek to inculcate their children in the values of the gay agenda? Just like traditional parents might inculcate their children into believing in traditional values? I don’t see the controversey there. In any case, this story is about the resolute steadfastness of an archbishop in the face of pressure from pelosi and the gay left agenda. Sorry to see any catholic be sympathetic to the gay lobby and it’s smears.
Ishii
Agreed.Agreed. I wouldn’t attend the rally.
The comments from event supporters in the letter in the link are not the sort of thing that will change hearts and minds toward the Catholic position (comparison to drug use and incest; gays want to put us in jail; gays “recruit” young people; comparison to dog marriage). In fact they could make the situation worse. The minute a “traditional marriage” supporter brings up the dog marriage argument they get labeled as an idiot.
If you want to support the Catholic position, how about instead an event with a Catholic theme? Maybe an event to celebrate Catholic couples, Catholic parents, Catholic families? A “pro-marriage” rally like this is not going to do a lot for public opinion.
What’s wrong with marrying a dog? I’m being serious. My wife told me that she knew a woman who had sex with her dog.Agreed. I wouldn’t attend the rally.
The comments from event supporters in the letter in the link are not the sort of thing that will change hearts and minds toward the Catholic position (comparison to drug use and incest; gays want to put us in jail; gays “recruit” young people; comparison to dog marriage). In fact they could make the situation worse. The minute a “traditional marriage” supporter brings up the dog marriage argument they get labeled as an idiot.
If you want to support the Catholic position, how about instead an event with a Catholic theme? Maybe an event to celebrate Catholic couples, Catholic parents, Catholic families? A “pro-marriage” rally like this is not going to do a lot for public opinion.
A dog can not give consent, either to marriage or to sex. That is why bestiality is a criminal offense. It is considered animal abuse.What’s wrong with marrying a dog? I’m being serious. My wife told me that she knew a woman who had sex with her dog.
First off, gracepoole - you might actually get the story right. Then have the discussion. Who on the Family Research Council actually said the shooting in California were caused by God’s wrath against gay “marriage” ? Lay out the facts, and let’s discuss. Quit with the innuendo and talking points by the Southern Poverty Law Center and get the real facts.So legalized same-sex marriage and God’s wrath against it are responsible for a mass shooting?
Take it down a notch, Ishii. It’s a friendly discussion. And here – a quick web search turned up an audio clip of FRC’s Ken Blackwell:First off, gracepoole - you might actually get the story right. Then have the discussion. Who on the Family Research Council actually said the shooting in California were caused by God’s wrath against gay “marriage” ? Lay out the facts, and let’s discuss. Quit with the innuendo and talking points by the Southern Poverty Law Center and get the real facts.
Ishii
So where did NOW or Ken Blackwell claim that the shooting was God’s wrath against gay marriage? (that was implied in your previous post). And what does James Dobson have to do with the marriage rally which is the topic of this thread? Like I said, stick to the facts, gracepoole and lose the distortions.Take it down a notch, Ishii. It’s a friendly discussion. And here – a quick web search turned up an audio clip of FRC’s Ken Blackwell:
huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/28/isla-vista-shooting-gay-marriage-_n_5405028.html
And then there’s James Dobson, who linked gay marriage with Newtown and God’s judgement:
newsmax.com/TheWire/dobson-shooting-gay-marriage-abortion/2012/12/18/id/468249/
Initially, I assumed that the FRC was claiming that gay marriage caused God’s wrath, which in turned caused mass shootings – I couldn’t imagine another explanation for the link being made. But for Blackwell, it turns out the claim is just another brand of ignorance: gay marriage = complete breakdown of morality throughout society = mass shootings. I really hope an explanation of the invalidity of this claim is unnecessary. I also hope it’s unnecessary to explain why this kind of claim is as baseless as the “God’s wrath” judgement.So where did NOW or Ken Blackwell claim that the shooting was God’s wrath against gay marriage? (that was implied in your previous post). And what does James Dobson have to do with the marriage rally which is the topic of this thread? Like I said, stick to the facts, gracepoole and lose the distortions.
Ishii
Taking from the bolded above. I would argue that so-called SSM is most certainly a symptom of complete breakdown of morality throughout society.But for Blackwell, it turns out the claim is just another brand of ignorance: ***gay marriage = complete breakdown of morality throughout society ***= mass shootings. I really hope an explanation of the invalidity of this claim is unnecessary. I also hope it’s unnecessary to explain why this kind of claim is as baseless as the “God’s wrath” judgement.