“He of course has to say the Saturday Vigil Mass so any other Mass would have to be a Wedding or funeral Mass.”
No, he doesn’t have to say the Vigil Mass. That is such a stupid name for it, by the way (not that you made it up, but it is just stupid). A Vigil is the MASS of the day before, not the next day’s Mass done early. I don’t even know when or why it was invented (I know it was sometime after the fabricated Novus Ordo). Moreover, a Priest is permitted to say more than one Mass in a day, if need be. Usually on Sunday he is allowed up to three Masses (I think). The Vigil counts as a Sunday Mass. I don’t see how he concludes that he cannot have a Saturday morning Mass with the Vigil. If anything, if he thinks he can only have one Mass, and if he chose the Vigil, THAT would be his only Mass, since it is a Mass of SUNDAY, not Saturday (this is based around the fact that all major feasts, including all Sundays, have two Vespers, the evening before the day, which would be Saturday, and the evening of the day, which would be Sunday. A feast begins with its FIRST Vespers, if it has one, so Vespers can be pushed as early as 4 PM, I suppose, since that is when the “Vigil” Masses can begin; however, the normative time for Vespers is 5 PM. Therefore, the day Liturgically has chnaged at Vespers, so the Vigil Mass is the first Mass of the Sunday.) Of course, the whole idea of using a Mass of the next day is bogus, and was one of the many fabrications of the NO.
As far as the Masses at my church: we have two on Saturday mornings. We have two everyday, since we have two Priests. Then again, I go to Traditional Latin Mass. I know most NO Priests will not say Mass on their “days off”–what a joke…