B
Back2Church
Guest
It is a relevant statement, you simply missed the point.This latest statement of yours seems somewhat off-topic to the point we were discussing, which was whether it was likely that the boy himself preferred the backpack.
I asked:
To which you replied:Can you imagine a nine year old kid that would rather stick with his backpack choice to the point of being so scared of going to school that he didn’t even want to get out of the car, rather than ask his parents for a new one?
Your “Yes, quite easily” statement points to a situation that is far more grave than a simple case of being bullied over a backpack, but entails a child who has no joy in anything in life other than a single material object. That’s a much larger problem. Such a “quite easily” imagined scenario would be so rare it’s actually quite difficult to imagine it being plausible.Yes, quite easily. That backpack could be the one thing that gives him happiness in his otherwise miserable life. Certainly his life while at school was miserable.
What I’m saying is that your objection to my point does not hold.
So if suicide can be about being true to oneself, does that mean such a person had lived his or her entire life not being true to his or her self? I’m sorry, but that just doesn’t make sense. Suicide is not a personality trait. People who don’t fit in can still live in the world. They don’t have to kill themselves to be true to themselves. It’s the suffering and hopelessness of never being able to fit in or be accepted that drives them to suicide. Not because they feel the only way they can be true to themselves is to kill themselves.Suicide can be about escaping suffering and hopelessness, and also about being true to oneself. The two are not contradictory.