Scientists are growing organs from aborted babies

  • Thread starter Thread starter epower
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Disgusting.Praying that they are shut down, it’s the only way to end their evil.
 
I can’t help wondering what happens to the soul of a human being if their biological presence is kept and grown.

It doesn’t bear thinking about, poor little baby boys and girls. 😦
 
ephesians4 said:
I can’t help wondering what happens to the soul of a human being if their biological presence is kept and grown.

It doesn’t bear thinking about, poor little baby boys and girls. 😦
Click to expand...
What happens to the soul of a fetus who turns into a parasitic or vanishing twin? Their biological presence is also kept and grown.
 
SuperLuigi said:
Maybe there’s Nazis somewhere are kicking themselves for not using “women’s health” and other semantics for their experiments…
Click to expand...
I don’t think it would be a maybe. Hitler learned a lot from the United States. He admired our eugenics programs and even got the idea for the gas chambers from the American Eugenicists. You may already know all of this but I just found out about it recently and I was a bit shocked.

sfgate.com/opinion/article/Eugenics-and-the-Nazis-the-California-2549771.php
 
So we kill a baby to harvest her organs, so we can grow them and transplant them to save a different baby.

Instead, why don’t we just leave the healthy baby alone?
 
zz912 said:
So we kill a baby to harvest her organs, so we can grow them and transplant them to save a different baby.
Click to expand...
This is a bit misleading. Nobody is roping women in, impregnating them, and forcing them to have abortions in order to drive the fetal tissue trade. It’s merely the aftereffect of a dubious (yet legal) procedure.
 
The Vatican of course, has spoken out against abortion but I wonder, if it is going to speak out on this specific issue at some point.

Pope Francis and Obama seem to be in good relations to each other, of course, Obama is a firm backer of Planned Parenthood. Obama will surely welcome the Pope when he comes to Philadelphia.

Just observations.

Normally, I would think we might have heard some sort of comment on this situation. Naming Planned Parenthood specifically would not need to be done.
 
Darryl_Revok said:
This is a bit misleading. Nobody is roping women in, impregnating them, and forcing them to have abortions in order to drive the fetal tissue trade. It’s merely the aftereffect of a dubious (yet legal) procedure.
Click to expand...
This isn’t misleading. Its disgusting and beyond. Certainly there is nothing “mere” or “dubious”, nor an “aftereffect” of butchering infants.
 
Darryl_Revok said:
This is a bit misleading. Nobody is roping women in, impregnating them, and forcing them to have abortions in order to drive the fetal tissue trade. It’s merely the aftereffect of a dubious (yet legal) procedure.
Click to expand...
👍
 
Darryl_Revok said:
This is a bit misleading. Nobody is roping women in, impregnating them, and forcing them to have abortions in order to drive the fetal tissue trade. It’s merely the aftereffect of a dubious (yet legal) procedure.
Click to expand...
I understand pointing out that it’s a repercussion, but in this translation you have changed killing a baby to a dubious procedure. Why?
 
grotto said:
This isn’t misleading. Its disgusting and beyond. Certainly there is nothing “mere” or “dubious”, nor an “aftereffect” of butchering infants.
Click to expand...
It implies that the doctors who conduct fetal tissue experiments are part of a factory system which farms fetuses for medical use. Since that is not the case, it’s misleading in that implies a moral culpability which I don’t think is apparent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top