B
buffalo
Guest
greg_b - there are probably 10,000 posts on these matters. It is a bot more complicated than it looks on the surface.
Of course, biologists generally agree that speciation in higher organisms takes a long time. But, here you go:I would like to see testable, repeatable and predictable evidence of speciation.
You will not be able to provide the evidence, so that leaves us with best fit theories. That is what evolution does with common descent. Let us take the pieces of the puzzle we do have and with an a priori vision put them together. Any materialist evolutionist will admit the a priori view that they cannot and will not allow the divine foot in the door. Therefore macro is not a valid truth.
What species are the evolved fuitflies?Of course, biologists generally agree that speciation in higher organisms takes a long time. But, here you go:
talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html
Again, I’m not a scientist, but the above article was pretty understandable. Makes sense to me that speciation is more easily observed in fruit flies, etc., with extremely short lifespans.
You know, I cannot for the life of me begin to understand why so many Catholics feel so threatened by evolution, when our own Church hasn’t a problem with it, as long as we acknowledge God’s role as Creator.
How many believe that?Iand believe that Jesus rode a Dinosaur into Jerusalem (And no, I did not make up that last part. Many actually believe that)
I agree.Well, you might be right, but personally, I think Joe Biden is the missing link. I think he’s right between the rat creature and the ape-guy on the scale.
greg_b;5226622:
Since the dinosaurs lived over 50 million years before even the first hominid, that’s a stretch.So who are you going to trust more… The Catholic Church and her scientists or a bunch of anti-Catholic fundamentalists who deny every piece of evolution and believe that Jesus rode a Dinosaur into Jerusalem (And no, I did not make up that last part. Many actually believe that)
buffalo;5226643:
According to TruthisBeauty7 & Buffalo, the tinfoil hat says that the dinosaurs probably lived on the Ark as wellSince the dinosaurs lived over 50 million years before even the first hominid, that’s a stretch.![]()
How big was the average dinosaur? Do you know?According to TruthisBeauty7 & Buffalo, the tinfoil hat says that the dinosaurs probably lived on the Ark as well![]()
They are simply piecing a puzzle together, nothing more, nothing less. Christians ascribing this sort of conscious, malevolent intent to scientists is discouraging.In my Humble Opinion The purpose of claiming this is the missing link is to weaken humanity’s faith in God .
You would do better to stick to the arguments rather than attacking the person.It’s people like Buffalo and their denial of simple reality that causes other Catholics to leave the church and prevents others from joining because we look like a bunch of conspiracy crackpots
You would do better to stick to the arguments rather than attacking the person.
Perhaps you could answer how evolution can be reconciled with the dogmas of the faith. What I have learned after a “more than a few” posts that most Catholics are not even aware of these dogmas.
Do you assent to all of them?
*] God keeps all created things in existence. (De fide.)
*] God co-operates immediately in every act of His creatures. (Sent. communis.)
*] God through His providence, protects and guides all that He has created. (De fide.)
*] The first man was created by God. (De fide.)
*] The whole human race stems from one single human pair. (Sent. certa.)
*] Man consists of two essential parts–a material body and a spiritual soul. (De fide.)
*] The rational soul is per se the essential form of the body. (De fide.)
*] Every human being possesses an individual soul. (De fide.)
*] Every individual soul was immediately created out of nothing by God. (Sent. Certa.)
*] A creature has the capacity to receive supernatural gifts. (Sent. communis.)
*] The Supernatural presupposes Nature. (Sent communis.)
*] God has conferred on man a supernatural Destiny. (De fide.)
*] Our first parents, before the Fall, were endowed with sanctifying grace. (De fide.)
*] The donum rectitudinis or integritatis in the narrower sense, i.e., the freedom from irregular desire. (Sent. fidei proxima.)
*] The donum immortalitatis, i.e., bodily immortality. (De fide.)
*] The donum impassibilitatis, i.e., the freedom from suffering. (Sent. communis.)
*] The donum scientiae, i.e., a knowledge of natural and supernatural truths infused by God. (Sent. communis.)
*] Adam received sanctifying grace not merely for himself, but for all his posterity. (Sent. certa.)
*] Our first parents in paradise sinned grievously through transgression of the Divine probationary commandment. (De fide.)
*] Through the sin our first parents lost sanctifying grace and provoked the anger and the indignation of God. (De fide.)
*] Our first parents became subject to death and to the dominion of the Devil. (De fide.) D788.
*] Adam’s sin is transmitted to his posterity, not by imitation, but by descent. (De fide.)
*] Original Sin consists in the deprivation of grace caused by the free act of sin committed by the head of the race. (Sent. communis.)
Then what are we arguing about? Case closed.Evolution does not contradict even one of those
Good, so you agree evolution is a scientific factThen what are we arguing about? Case closed.
very well then…so when human would have come to the very link of links of the darwin theory that would really establish it as a fact, i hope that the dead end of it would have led us humans to adam and eveMonkeys are dark furred.
Because a Lemur in a zoo isn’t a fossil.
Evolution is a scientific theory, and a dang good one too. I certainly believe it’s the way God created us. There’s lots of evidence in the Universe to support it, too, like how the Universe was created, how atoms work, how the human mind functions, and how God works slowly, never hastily.
With regard to this particular fossil, it seems to me that someone believed there was money to be made, given the huge hype. While I’m sure that some questions about the relationship of this creature to other very early primates may be answered, and the simple fact of its unusual completeness is exciting to scientists, there is a whole lot of overreaction going on.
The scientists wanted to preemptively beat the creationists to the press, because anytime a new fossil is found the creationist groups get in front of the mics and rant on about how this or that is just a hoax or lie or whatever, the scientific community probably has decided enough with this and decided to get to the finish line first this timeWith regard to this particular fossil, it seems to me that someone believed there was money to be made, given the huge hype. While I’m sure that some questions about the relationship of this creature to other very early primates may be answered, and the simple fact of its unusual completeness is exciting to scientists, there is a whole lot of overreaction going on.