Sean Hannity rails against James Comey, Hillary Clinton and “deep state crime

  • Thread starter Thread starter MonteRCMS
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
and, of course, we owe those unverified
allegations to Hillary who must pride herself on finding salacious comments to
smear her opponent.
i don’t believe these allegations for a second, but others obssessed with deviancy seem to enjoy repeating them.
i am a little confused as to why Catholics find it charitable to repeat UNVERIFIED
allegations which were paid for by an opponent of President Trump.
 
**
Comey is more like Eliot Ness and Trump is more like Al Capone.
http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2018/04/17/shows-dc-bookstore-buy-comeys-book/

But on hand were more photographers, reporters and salespeople, all working the night shift, than customers.

i like the book title used in the article
“I Have Higher Morals Than You” which seemd to fit in with Comey’s giant ego.
there were some good comments left at the end of the article. i hope Americans are smart and won’t be buying his book.
the bargain bins should fill up quick with this book.
 
Dershowitz is a PROMINENT left-winger but lately has been taking the right-wing side.
I wouldn’t call him “right wing” in any respect. He’s a civil libertarian, which is the basis for his critique of Mueller and the whole special prosecutor institution. He thinks the whole thing is a violation of constitutional rights.
 
There’s a fair number of occasions whereas I was critical of some of Obama’s moves, so instead of stereotyping me, maybe it would be better if you dealt with facts instead of manifesting maybe your own “projection”.
 
Is this mean to sound like getting fined is the same as murder or something? 💪
A violation of the law can be handled with different potential punishments, and “fines” are one of those possible punishments.
 
And why are people so concerned about what HRC 17 months later?

Because they apparently have no effective counter argument?
And I have no doubt, the same people will be bringing up HRC 2 years from now because they apparently have no effective counter argument.
 
Yeah, yeah we know. You’ve been very desperate to find something…ANYTHING to get Trump on now for 2 years and haven’t been able to even with the full backing the globalists, mainstream media, late-night talk shows and academia.
 
Yeah, yeah we know. You’ve been very desperate to find something…ANYTHING to get Trump on now for 2 years and haven’t been able to even with the full backing the globalists, mainstream media, late-night talk shows and academia.
Yeah, yeah we know. You’ve been very desperate to find something…ANYTHING to get Hillary Clinton on now for 6 years and haven’t been able to even with the full backing of the alt-right, mainstream media-wannabe bloggers, Internet talk shows and deep state Illuminati/Masons.
 
Last edited:
now the DNC resorts to a lawsuit against the Trump campaign. they must be getting
desperate. if any campaign should be filing a lawsuit it should be the Bernie Sanders campaign against Hillary and the DNC.
 
Yeah, yeah we know. You’ve been very desperate to find something…ANYTHING to get Hillary Clinton on now for 6 years and haven’t been able to even with the full backing of the alt-right, mainstream media-wannabe bloggers, Internet talk shows and deep state Illuminati/Masons.
😀🤣😂

Cut’n’paste response.
  1. I don’t have the full backing of the alt-right
  2. I don’t know what a “wannabe mainstream media” blogger is, but a lot of media outlets from Ben Shapiro to Philip de Franco are very successful and a big threat to the anti-Trump, anti-Catholic establish media.
  3. I know next to nothing about Illuminati or masons, much less have their support.
Donald J. Trump is still kicking and still winning.
 
And that gives me no information on why I should care about his views.
Harvard professor of Constitutional Law. Has published a number of books. Well regarded nationally, and has been for years. Like you, he’s very much a liberal.


But you’re free to reject what he says just because they don’t fit what you prefer to believe.
 
Hillary didn’t appear in public on election night because she was scheduled to become president and then she was into the chardonnay [her words].
 
Last edited:
Yeah, yeah we know. You’ve been very desperate to find something…ANYTHING to get Trump on now for 2 years and haven’t been able to even with the full backing the globalists, mainstream media, late-night talk shows and academia.
When one resorts to stereotyping people and/or groups, they’ve lost the debate.
 
That’s not stereotyping.

Also, don’t be so sensitive or toss around buzz-words. That’s how you lose a debate. 😏
 
That’s not stereotyping.
Maybe you should look up the definition of the word because you actually use stereotyping quite often. It is a form of lying, which is why good parents teach their children not to use it. So, maybe actually try to deal with what’s being discussed without making blanket accusations.
 
Last edited:
I don’t find anything he says liberal at all, so I doubt he is very much a liberal like me. Furthermore, it seems that those on the right freely reject views of supposed experts, so what makes Dershowitz special that you keep bringing him up over and over again (don’t make me search). Why you do you think he is an especially great man that you listen to his point of views and why do you reject others with similar qualifications?
He is a lifelong democrat who voted for Hillary Clinton. But he has recently been criticized by the left for defending Israel; something that’s out of fashion for most liberals now even though Chuck Schumer does too. It did, however, cost Joe Lieberman his position with the party.

Dershowitz’ big problem with the Dems and other liberals at present is that he is a pretty radical civil libertarian. Liberals used to be as well, but anymore seemingly it’s now only in the narrow issue of sex. Privacy, for example, is only revered when it comes to abortion.

I don’t particularly love Dershowitz. After all, he really is a liberal and always has been. I’m not even as big on civil liberties as he is. But I do agree with him that what we’re seeing now in American law enforcement is a serious decline in its fairness and even-handedness. Apparently some other legal scholar has written a book entitled “Three Times a Day” in which he maintains that federal laws are so vague every person in America commits a federal felony three times a day without knowing it.

I don’t want my grandchildren to grow up in a banana republic in which political parties try to gain or retain power by jailing their opponents. I’m afraid we’re very close to that right now.

Dershowitz says the same thing. I have believed it for years and years, ever since I had occasion (just to do it) to read the federal criminal statutes. At the time, I was inclined to think more in terms of once/week, but I’ll buy three times/day if the experts say it.

Dershowitz is certainly a prominent American and has been for years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top