second question for our non-catholic brethern

  • Thread starter Thread starter PJM
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
God …. I am not sure how you know.
I will tell you, since you’re not sure. 🙂

You know that Hebrews is inspired because you defer to the authority of the Catholic Church, which told you that it is.
 
God …. I am not sure how you know.
Incidentally, we are agreed that God is who told us that Hebrews is inspired…but unless He came to you in a dream and told you that Hebrews is inspired and that the letters of Clement are not…then you know in the same manner that everyone else does…by giving tacit submission to the authority of the CC.

And, thank you for using the “quote” feature correctly. 👍
 
=Protestor;11473245]Randy Carson yes when they were still the universal church or faith. Do not take full authority as being authority over details of faith that do not matter.
Jmcrea ok just as an example I did a quick skim of the end of joshua and beginning of judges this is what I found. Moses had central power or authority and passed it on to Joshua he had central power or authority then the elders at the time of his death were given authority not so central and they were not given authority over everything. After their deaths no authority. Then God gives authority to judges. You see how this is not working in your favor or do I have to point it out? The whole OT is pretty much the same story over and over again God gives authority man messes it up usually one or two generations down the line and then it gets passed to someone else. Does the mosaic law reign as the authority yes but laws can be interpreted in many ways and man has a tendency to add superfluous things.
PJM I am not sure if you think that changing the color of your argument makes it stronger or easier to understand but it does not. Second just because you (put things in parenthesis does not mean that I had to inte)rpret something the same way. Even bible commentators do not normally do what you are doing “bible quote(what I think it means) bible quote” and it holds no weight in my book. So I guess God breaks his commitments and Christ does not(this is not what I think you are saying but definitely how I could interpret it). I think you are missing the point of John 17:20 -21 he is not only giving the disciples authority and unity with the father but he is also giving this to all christians.That is at least how i interpret it. These blessings are for the church as a whole not just the disciples.
May you bless God
That position is clearly NOT biblical:) Here’s why

begin with Mt 10:1-8

Then Mt. 16:15-19
Mt. 18:18
John 20:19-23
Mk. 14: 15-16
Mt. 28: 16-20
Eph. 4:4-8

AND their is even more, but in each case; and in every case it is Christ speaking exclusively to; directly to and precisely to His apostles THROUGH Peter.

Following Old Testament Tradition and example of Just “One Chosen People”
Exodus 6:7 “And I will take you to myself for my people, I will be your God: and you shall know that I am the Lord your God who brought you out from the work prison of the Egyptians”

EVERY reference to “church” in the bible was [and continues to be] meant ONLY “the Church” Mt 16: “MY CHURCH” singular"; that Christ founded and gave CONTROL of to Peter. TODAY’S Catholic Church. That my friend is the FIRST meaning of “binding and loosening”: TERMS of complete Power and Authority of Governance.

Just as in the OT God Choose ONLY One “people”; Christ followed suit with Only One Church.

One God
Can and does have ONLY One set of Faith beliefs AND he did not wait for Henry, Luther, Calvin, Smith:some 1,200 to 1,500 years to introduce His One Faith in One Church:)

Further: in John 17:18 And John 20:21 Christ is LIMITING to who he is granting ALL of His Powers and Authority: cf. as the Father has sent ME SO TO I [GOD] SEND YOU

This TRANSFER of Godly power simply cannot extend by some sort of proxy; more than 1,000 years later:shrug:

Thanks for your critique:thumbsup:
God bless you,
Patrick
 
I cleaned it up so that it was readable. I also erased all of your premises that were irrelevant.
That position is clearly not biblical here’s why begin with
Mt 10:1-8
Mt. 16:15-19
Mt. 18:18
John 20:19-23
Mt. 28: 16-20

This transfer of Godly power simply cannot extend by some sort of proxy; more than 1,000 years later

Thanks for your critique
God bless you,
Patrick
Why can the transfer not happen a 1000 years later?

I fear you may misunderstand my point. My point was that Christ asks God to give the same gifts that Jesus asked God to give to the apostles earlier in the chapter to be bestowed upon their disciples. I am not saying that these disciples then received all the same gifts as the apostles. Though I do believe that God reserves the right to bestow these gifts on whomever he wills.

On a seperate note you may not see the way you act on this forum as being bullying, but it is. So I am going to ask you once more do not underline, bold, and spam caps. I see that as you being verbally aggressive. On another note it does not help to get your point across. What you do when someone disagrees with you is not the way that you change anyones opinion. You only make people search for the flaws in your arguments which I will assure you that there are many. A little joking is fine I have a tough skin. Do not mistake this as a cry for help I am telling you for other people who will not speak up and then they will just stop posting on this site. If you do not stop I will no longer respond to your comments, because you are not worth my time.
 
Incidentally, we are agreed that God is who told us that Hebrews is inspired…but unless He came to you in a dream and told you that Hebrews is inspired and that the letters of Clement are not…then you know in the same manner that everyone else does…by giving tacit submission to the authority of the CC.

And, thank you for using the “quote” feature correctly. 👍
So I have no word on the letters of clement though I have read parts of them. Let me read all of them and get back to you if I receive a word from God.
 
So I have no word on the letters of clement though I have read parts of them. Let me read all of them and get back to you if I receive a word from God.
:confused:

You aren’t really advocating the position that you are free to read some ancient manuscripts and discern for yourself whether they are the Word of God, are you? :eek:

Remember, if you permit yourself this right, then you will not be able to object to others doing the same. And when you are trying to evangelize, say, Bahais, who believe that the writings of their prophets are the inspired Word of God, they will simply say, “I have done what you have done–read some texts and received inspiration from God that my prophets’ writings are sacred.”

Also do you then believe that if God tells another Christian that the writings of Paul are not inspired, but, rather, are demonic, that this means he is correct?
 
You aren’t really advocating the position that you are free to read some ancient manuscripts and discern for yourself whether they are the Word of God, are you?
(divine revelation)<(personal opinion)
 
(divine revelation)<(personal opinion)
I don’t know what you’re saying. Did you mean that divine revelation* is greater than* personal opinion? (because you actually used the “is lesser than” symbol)

The point that I am making is that you believe that Hebrews is inspired through **one route only: ** through the Catholic Church.

Unless you want to say that God came to you in a vision and told you that Hebrews is inspired, and that the Gospel of Mark is inspired, etc etc etc??
 
Oh yes; I think my brain-eye coordination was just running a little slow earlier. I’ve definitely heard of her, although not so much in the last 20 or 25 years.

Maybe I should watch that movie again (was it just called “Joni”?)
-yes she sings.She is on Mars Hill network radio stations ,5:30 PM. marshillnetwork.org/
Well, I guess I can forgive her that. 😃
 
I mean greater than

are visions and dreams the only way God can communicate us? we are getting slightly off topic it would be nice to travel back to the topic of the authority of the church
 
So, how is it that you know that Hebrews is inspired? How did God reveal this fact to you?
 
=PRmerger;11474155]But how do you know that, say, Hebrews, is the inspired Word of God? Who told you?
And who told that person? And who told that person?
The answer is: the Catholic Church told you.
You would not know it any other way.
GOD [Christ] DID Personally

PLEASE READ: 2nd. Tim 3:16
John 17:18-20
Mt. 16:18-19
Mt. 28:18-20:)

God Bless you and THANKS for asking
Patrick
 
GOD [Christ] DID Personally

PLEASE READ: 2nd. Tim 3:16
John 17:18-20
Mt. 16:18-19
Mt. 28:18-20:)

God Bless you and THANKS for asking
Patrick
Hebrews is **not **mentioned in any of those verses, PJM.

Nor do you know that the writings of John, Paul, Matthew are God’s Word…except for the Catholic Church telling you so.
 
=PRmerger;11475834]Hebrews is **not **mentioned in any of those verses, PJM.
Nor do you know that the writings of John, Paul, Matthew are God’s Word…except for the Catholic Church telling you so.
OK:D

BUT it’s included in the Original Canon of the Bible right?

So what I shared does and MUST apply [no option here] its a Doctrine of our Faith and has been for about 1600/1700 years

God Bless you.

Consider this point:

Either the Bible IS the Inspired [does not mean dictated] Word of God or Christianity is a hoax and the bible is useless. [ALL of the bible] inferred.👍
 
Oh yes; I think my brain-eye coordination was just running a little slow earlier. I’ve definitely heard of her, although not so much in the last 20 or 25 years.

Maybe I should watch that movie again (was it just called “Joni”?)
Yes, thanks for reminding me .I did see it way back when.
 
The books of sacred scripture are sacred because they were the only books that were transmitted by God as it were from hand to hand.
Catholic hand to Catholic hand - that’s how they were preserved.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top