Second thoughts about the sexual revolution

  • Thread starter Thread starter ATraveller
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
ATraveller said:
40.png
Alex337:
They were ignored not by the sexual revolution but by old privilege. The same that protected Chaplin.
Click to expand...
The description of the process is in the article and in other posts. You just don’t want to listen. That’s not my problem. Reread it.
Alex337 said:
Sorry, the sexual revolution didn’t invent skeazy men. Nor did it claim it could get rid of them. But we are making progress through other branches of feminism.
Click to expand...
Seriously, are you just ignoring the article and what I’ve been repeating over and over again? If you want a serious discussion, try to be serious.
Click to expand...
I think you may be forgetting the fact I’ve told you the link won’t work on my phone. So, does the article acknowledge that none of this is new?
 
ATraveller said:
It’s one less suicide not 9. But again, can you demonstrate how many of the 10000 marriages were forced?
Click to expand...
I’ve already told you it’s impossible and provided stats on how suicide dropped and older people took advantage of divorce as soon as they could. I doubt you’ll accept any evidence that goes against your world view. So, conversely; how many forced marriages is acceptable?
 
Alex337 said:
So, does the article acknowledge that none of this is new?
Click to expand...
Yes. If you didn’t read it, don’t discuss it.
Yes, cads and brutes have always been with us; yes, accusations shouldn’t be lodged cavalierly and need to be assessed carefully; and yes, as the examples of Fox News and other workplaces have revealed, harassment and accusations of harassment aren’t just a progressive thing. Even so, it is undeniable that a disproportionate number of the prominent men brought down by these scandals have been identified with—and sometimes indistinguishable from—a political worldview that enthusiastically embraces the tenets of the sexual revolution. Indeed, many proudly wore their feminist credentials on their sleeves.
Click to expand...
 
Alex337 said:
I doubt you’ll accept any evidence that goes against your world view.
Click to expand...
The same can be said about you. I provided my evidence but you ignored it or in fact, didn’t read it but went on discussing an article without actually knowing the content.
 
Last edited:
It’s almost like in the day and age of true mass media it’s harder to hide such scandals or something 🤔 she doesn’t deny that these have always happened. Seems a bit pointless.
 
Because mass media was birthed by the revolution?
I’m sorry but you are mixing correlation with causation.
Look, if you didn’t read it why are you commenting?
 
Last edited:
ATraveller said:
40.png
Alex337:
I doubt you’ll accept any evidence that goes against your world view.
Click to expand...
The same can be said about you. I provided my evidence but you ignored it or in fact, didn’t read it but went on discussing an article without actually knowing the content.
Click to expand...
I’m happy to discuss the content you show in a means I can access though 😊 how many forced marriages are okay?
 
What exactly does Marxism have to do with the Sexual Revolution?
 
Alex337 said:
40.png
deMontfort:
40.png
JanSobieskiIII:
I’m amazed that the sexual revolution is being defended on a Catholic forum.
Click to expand...
Well, lots of Marxists running around here: The sexual revolution is near and dear to the Commie heart I’m afraid 🤯
Click to expand...
The thing I love is that shouting Marxist, and in particular “cultural Marxist” began life primarily as a white nationalist dog whistle as it referenced the Frankfurt school, who had no opinions on the sexual revolution. Nor does classical Marxism. But they were Jews, so the term became a popular way of covertly hating them. It’s now been picked up by people who don’t seem to know the history or ideology of either it or what it claims to represent.
Click to expand...
Flagged for making a false accusation of anti-Semitism. Conversation is over. If you EVER address a post to me again I will flag it for harassment. EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. YOU. DO. IT.
 
ATraveller said:
Because mass media was birthed by the revolution?
I’m sorry but you are mixing correlation with causation.
Look, if you didn’t read it why are you commenting?
Click to expand...
She admitted that sexual harassment is not new. That covering it up is not new. Sorry but the reason we hear about it more is mad media.
 
Go talk about it on a college campus and you’ll find out real quick.
 
It’s in the article if you didn’t read it, then why are you discussing it?
 
I’m not allowed to copy and past whole articles. That would be a copyright violation.
 
Alex337 said:
And how is discussing forced marriage “lowering” myself?
Click to expand...
Because you are assuming people actually want people to be abused. You’re not discussing but borderline smearing.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top