Seventh Day Adventists

  • Thread starter Thread starter Holly3278
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Richard: Here is plenty of Scriptural proof for you that the Word of the Lord is not limited to the written word. And that because of that, we cannot be saved by the written word or necessarily brought into communion with Christ only through the written word as you have suggested.

Oral Apostolic Tradition as taken from scripturecatholic.com :

Mark 13:31 - heaven and earth will pass away, but Jesus’ Word will not pass away. But Jesus never says anything about His Word being entirely committed to a book. Also, it took 400 years to compile the Bible, and another 1,000 years to invent the printing press. How was the Word of God communicated? Orally, by the bishops of the Church, with the guidance and protection of the Holy Spirit.

Mark 16:15 - Jesus commands the apostles to preach the Gospel to every creature. But Jesus did not want this preaching to stop after the apostles died, and yet the Bible was not compiled until four centuries later. The word of God was transferred orally.
Mark 3:14; 16:15 - Jesus commands the apostles to preach (not write) the gospel to the world. Jesus gives no commandment to the apostles to write, and gives them no indication that the oral apostolic word he commanded them to communicate would later die in the fourth century. If Jesus wanted Christianity to be limited to a book (which would be finalized four centuries later), wouldn’t He have said a word about it?
Luke 10:16 - He who hears you (not “who reads your writings”), hears me. The oral word passes from Jesus to the apostles to their successors by the gracious gifts of the Holy Spirit. This succession has been preserved in the Holy Catholic Church.
Luke 24:47 - Jesus explains that repentance and forgiveness of sins must be preached (not written) in Christ’s name to all nations. For Protestants to argue that the word of God is now limited to a book (subject to thousands of different interpretations) is to not only ignore Scripture, but introduce a radical theory about how God spreads His word which would have been unbelievable to the people at the time of Jesus.
Acts 2:3-4 - the Holy Spirit came to the apostles in the form of “tongues” of fire so that they would “speak” (not just write) the Word.
Acts 15:27 - Judas and Silas, successors to the apostles, were sent to bring God’s infallible Word by “word of mouth.”
Rom. 10:8 - the Word is near you, on your lips and in your heart, which is the word of faith which is preached (not just written).
Rom. 10:17 - faith comes by what is “heard” (not just read) which is the Word that is “preached” (not read). This word comes from the oral tradition of the apostles. Those in countries where the Scriptures are not available can still come to faith in Jesus Christ.
1 Cor. 15:1,11 - faith comes from what is “preached” (not read). For non-Catholics to argue that oral tradition once existed but exists no longer, they must prove this from Scripture. But no where does Scripture say oral tradition died with the apostles. To the contrary, Scripture says the oral word abides forever.
Gal. 1:11-12 - the Gospel which is “preached” (not read) to me is not a man’s Gospel, but the Revelation of Jesus Christ.
Eph. 1:13 - hearing (not reading) the Word of truth is the gospel of our salvation. This is the living word in the Church’s living tradition.
Col. 1:5 - of this you have “heard” (not read) before in the word of truth, the Gospel which has come to you.
1 Thess. 2:13 - the Word of God is what you have “heard” (not read). The orally communicated word of God lasts forever, and this word is preserved within the Church by the Holy Spirit.
2 Tim. 1:13 - oral communications are protected by the Spirit. They abide forever. Oral authority does not die with the apostles.
2 Tim. 4:2,6-7 - Paul, at the end of his life, charges Timothy to preach (not write) the Word. Oral teaching does not die with Paul.
Titus 1:3 - God’s word is manifested “through preaching” (not writing). This “preaching” is the tradition that comes from the apostles.
1 Peter 1:25 - the Word of the Lord abides forever and that Word is the good news that was “preached” (not read) to you. Because the Word is preached by the apostles and it lasts forever, it must be preserved by the apostles’ successors, or this could not be possible. Also, because the oral word abides forever, oral apostolic tradition could not have died in the fourth century with all teachings being committed to Scripture.
2 Peter 1:12, 15 - Peter says that he will leave a “means to recall these things in mind.” But since this was his last canonical epistle, this “means to recall” must therefore be the apostolic tradition and teaching authority of his office that he left behind.
2 John 1:12; 3 John 13 - John prefers to speak and not to write. Throughout history, the Word of God was always transferred orally and Jesus did not change this. To do so would have been a radical departure from the Judaic tradition.
Deut. 31:9-12 - Moses had the law read only every seven years. Was the word of God absent during the seven year interval? Of course not. The Word of God has always been given orally by God’s appointed ones, and was never limited to Scripture.
Isa. 40:8 - the grass withers, the flower fades, but the Word of our God (not necessarily written) will stand forever.
Isa. 59:21 - Isaiah prophesies the promise of a living voice to hand on the Word of God to generations by mouth, not by a book. This is either a false prophecy, or it has been fulfilled by the Catholic Church.
Joel 1:3 - tell your children of the Word of the Lord, and they tell their children, and their children tell another generation. Mal. 2:7 - the lips of a priest guard knowledge, and we should seek instruction from his mouth. Protestants want to argue all oral tradition was committed to Scripture? But no where does Scripture say this.

Care to move on to some SDA stuff now?

Blessings,

HC
 
I don’t think that I have been anti anything, please give me the post # of anything that I have said that is anti-Catholic and lets see if I need to rectify it.
And it’s “veiled”. K?
K
Look, I’m the least of the least here, but I don’t like it when someone claims arrogance on my part when you’ve been judging an ENTIRE FAITH and saying things like satan is behind the things we believe.
I stand by my statement that in my opinion you were being a little arrogant by your “stay with me” crack. I don’t think that you can show by anything I’ve said that I am being jugmental of your faith or any faith and I certainly have not said that Satan is behind the things you believe.
[/QUOTE]
 
I don’t think that I have been anti anything, please give me the post # of anything that I have said that is anti-Catholic and lets see if I need to rectify it.
Okay, let’s start with this:

First of all Jesus is not talking about some blasphemous Catholic rite called the eucharist. Post # 154
I stand by my statement that in my opinion you were being a little arrogant by your “stay with me” crack. I don’t think that you can show by anything I’ve said that I am being jugmental of your faith or any faith and I certainly have not said that Satan is behind the things you believe.
And that comment of yours I just posted isn’t arrogant? All I said was, “stay with me”. I’m not really sure how that can be construed as arrogant, but okay. I’m sorry.

And here’s one for being judgemental of my faith:

We receive grace through faith, not through the receiving of any sacrament. Post # 135

As for the comment about satan, I have mistakenly attributed that to you. It was not you, but ern. I’ll get him later. 🙂 (just kidding)

I apologize for that one.

Blessings,

HC
 
Let God be God! Don’t limit God. God created heaven & earth, he created you and me, he created the pope and he created pastors alike. He created everything we understand and everything we don’t, he has the power and authority to inspire holy men that do his will, to write his inspired words.
It’s true Jesus did describe the relationship with his church as a relationship between a bride and groom, but I would like add… That the bride (church) should remain faithful to her groom (Jesus). The church and Christ cannot be one, if the church doesn’t keep the commandments and have the faith of Jesus Christ, as mentioned in Rev.
Thanks for the suggestion of what I should do, but since I have a free mind given to me by God, the only source that I will continue reading and continue studying isn’t “Google” or anything else but the Word of God. In the Word of God I have all the information I need. Again, why I’m I going to limit his power, he inspired it! By the way nowhere in the Bible does it say that Paul, Peter, John, or any of the other apostals were Catholic, SDA, Baptist, Lutheran, ect, ect…
Savation is available to anyone who truely accepts Jesus Christ. Not if you become a member of a church. No church sacrificed itself for me on calvery, only Jesus Christ. That is why I choose to do his will, follow his commandments and have faith in him. 👍
 
HC - In post #194 I said the following: “No the fact is, that if SATAN working through Constantine and the POPE (538A.D.) were the ones that tried to change God’s Holy day.” and I also stated… “So I would argue that your if it wouldn’t have been for SATAN you might be faithful worshipers of God’s true day.”

Which I still stand by… You see the Bible tells me NO MAN ONE HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CHANGE GOD’s LAW (commandments), and the Bible also tells me in Daniel 7:25 “And he shall think to change the times and the law.” it also states in Mathew 15:6 “Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.” “In vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.”
and the Bible continues saying…
“Her priests have violated my law, and have profaned mine holy things: they have put no difference between the holy and profane … and have hid their eyes from my sabbaths, and I am profaned among them.” “Therefore have I poured out my indignation upon them.” Ezekiel 22:26, 31.

We all understand that their is ONLY Good (God) & evil (devil-satan-dragon, ect, ect.). So if it’s not from God, then it’s from the devil.

Though Satan hates God and His Son, he rarely admits it openly. In fact, he and his demons will pose as holy angels and as devoted Christian clergymen (2 Corinthians 11:13-15). What he presents as evidence for his side will seem so righteous, spiritual, and Jesus-like that nearly everybody on earth will be deceived and follow him (Matthew 24:24). He will doubtless use the Bible, as he did when tempting Jesus in the wilderness (Matthew 4:1, 11). Satan’s logic is so persuasive that it deceived one-third of the angels of heaven, Adam and Eve, and (at the time of the Flood) everybody on earth except eight people.

“To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.” Isaiah 8:20.

If I offended you I’ very sorry, but as I mentioned in past posts…Their can be NO SUBSTITUTION for TRUTH. The WORD of GOD is extremely CLEAR.
 
HC - In post #194 I said the following: “No the fact is, that if SATAN working through Constantine and the POPE (538A.D.) were the ones that tried to change God’s Holy day.” and I also stated… “So I would argue that your if it wouldn’t have been for SATAN you might be faithful worshipers of God’s true day.”
Which I still stand by… You see the Bible tells me NO MAN ONE HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CHANGE GOD’s LAW (commandments)
 
Let God be God! Don’t limit God.

You are the ones limiting God. You claim He can’t change the Law, do away with it or make a New Covenant with mankind. You are the ones limiting God to the Sabbath, not the Church. The Church lets the Holy Spirit move as He wills.
God created heaven & earth, he created you and me, he created the pope and he created pastors alike. He created everything we understand and everything we don’t, he has the power and authority to inspire holy men that do his will, to write his inspired words.
 
ern42 said to HappyCatholic: "Thanks for the suggestion of what I should do, but since I have a free mind given to me by God, the only source that I will continue reading and continue studying isn’t “Google” or anything else but the Word of God. In the Word of God I have all the information I need. Again, why I’m I going to limit his power, he inspired it! By the way nowhere in the Bible does it say that Paul, Peter, John, or any of the other apostals were Catholic, SDA, Baptist, Lutheran, ect, ect… "

I believe he is referring to a suggestion that I made to him regarding knowledge, and understanding of the Christian faith. Researching and studying various sources outside the confinement of the SDA, the Bible, or even the Catholic Church. He is apparently afraid to look up the history of the Christian church, and the history of how the bible he claims to believe in came into existence. The bosses in the SDA tell their victims that the real History of Christianity has been suppressed by the Catholic Church. It makes their fabrications much easier to swallow. He ignored my post, and I don’t blame him too much, he’s been brainwashed and is no doubt fearful of what he might find if he were to seek the truth.
Here is the link I posted for a secular and relatively unbiased article on how the Bible was put together in 382 AD at the council of Rome. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Rome
 
ern42 said to HappyCatholic: "Thanks for the suggestion of what I should do, but since I have a free mind given to me by God, the only source that I will continue reading and continue studying isn’t “Google” or anything else but the Word of God. In the Word of God I have all the information I need. Again, why I’m I going to limit his power, he inspired it! By the way nowhere in the Bible does it say that Paul, Peter, John, or any of the other apostals were Catholic, SDA, Baptist, Lutheran, ect, ect… "

I believe he is referring to a suggestion that I made to him regarding knowledge, and understanding of the Christian faith. Researching and studying various sources outside the confinement of the SDA, the Bible, or even the Catholic Church. He is apparently afraid to look up the history of the Christian church, and the history of how the bible he claims to believe in came into existence. The bosses in the SDA tell their victims that the real History of Christianity has been suppressed by the Catholic Church. It makes their fabrications much easier to swallow. He ignored my post, and I don’t blame him too much, he’s been brainwashed and is no doubt fearful of what he might find if he were to seek the truth.
Here is the link I posted for a secular and relatively unbiased article on how the Bible was put together in 382 AD at the council of Rome. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Rome
greggy:

On this subject, I was raised Southern Baptist, but never Baptized in that faith. I wasn’t actually Baptized until I was 37 years old. I always felt like I should really be careful of what faith education I was getting. I went to church but I never felt like I was getting “the whole truth”, not even the big “T” truth, just the little t truth. I felt just like I do here, that those in the Protestant churches were parroting the same things over and over just to get me to believe one thing or another.

First of all they scared me to death with talk about Revelation. (another story)

Anyhoo, this is where I’m going with this:

A person discerning their faith should always study all Christian faith. I really researched the catholic Church. I read till my eyes just about popped out of my head. At the time, I had some SDA friends and I started reading what they gave me about their fundemental beliefs and I was astounded that educated folks could actually be led to believe some of what they gave me.

I could easily discount it on my own, without guidance from another church.

That is why neither ern nor Richard will answer my questions or yours. They don’t have answers. When they don’t have answers they do what Protestants do, they ignore you. They do this because it is what they are taught. Where catholics are taught to study and go into the den of sinners, Protestants (especially SDAs) are taught to avoid them at all cost. Heck, my SDA mother-n-law told me my priest was not allowed on her property for my son’s (her grandson) wedding.

Now what in the world could a priest do to her? Convert her on the spot?

It’s fear. Fear of what they don’t know. They are spoon-fed portions that are supportive of the persons feeding them. They are quite happy to use their cut and paste parroted Bible passages to refute our faith, but get them to talk about theirs. They won’t. They don’t have Scripture to back it up because we can prove them wrong about 99% of it.

Edit: One more thing: Protestants might claim to “know” their Bibles and be Bible believing Christians, but the fact of the matter is, I’ve read and understood more of my Bible since becoming catholic. I see more of the Bible and less talkie talkie in Mass than I did in Protestant churches.

The thing is being catholic or Protestant doesn’t make you a scholar. Reading gives you knowledge and the correct guidance gives you assurance that you are going in the right direction. The thing is, if we believe we know it all then we’re less likely to ask for directions. :o

I welcome any answers to any of my questions.

Blessings,

HC
 
To Happycatholic: That is a great testimony. My wife and are cradle Catholics although we wandered away from Christianity when we were young. What you said about researching, and studying our faith reminded me of something Alexander Pope once wrote: “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
Drink deep or taste not the pierian spring.”
 
To Happycatholic: That is a great testimony. My wife and are cradle Catholics although we wandered away from Christianity when we were young. What you said about researching, and studying our faith reminded me of something Alexander Pope once wrote: “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
Drink deep or taste not the pierian spring.”
I wish I was a cradle catholic. That would mean I’d devoted more of my life to Christ’s Church. :o

I love the quote. 🙂

Thank you.

HC
 
… [cricket chirping]

Where did they go?

:onpatrol:

God Bless 'em!
 
They are probably trying to give me a hint:shrug:
BOO!! Ha ha. Hi you all a real in the flesh…wooooo Seventh-day Adventist Christian!! Yeah me, real flesh and blood bona fide Adventist!! Hi greetings to all Romans on this blog.

I am known as brother2 but I also sign Michael to be more personal…I love Roman Catholic Christians and am reasonably clear on what you believe…not only from the perspective of Adventism…ok…um an open minded Adventist…is there any such thing? Yeah…me…brother2!!

Got an interesting Video for you to start us off…amazingdiscoveries.tv/media/431/Angels_and_Demons_The_Vatican_Agenda/

It probably an Adventist video so I apologise in advance for any offensive content…but it explains an interesting point about Angels and Demons, the film…I did a blog on this forum contending it was a good recruiting film for the Vatican…tho I was kinder about it that the persons on this video…I include it only for discussion purposes…as I say sorry for offensive content…

Shalom. May God bless all here. Michael.😉
 
BOO!! Ha ha. Hi you all a real in the flesh…wooooo Seventh-day Adventist Christian!! Yeah me, real flesh and blood bona fide Adventist!! Hi greetings to all Romans on this blog.

I am known as brother2 but I also sign Michael to be more personal…I love Roman Catholic Christians and am reasonably clear on what you believe…not only from the perspective of Adventism…ok…um an open minded Adventist…is there any such thing? Yeah…me…brother2!!

Got an interesting Video for you to start us off…amazingdiscoveries.tv/media/431/Angels_and_Demons_The_Vatican_Agenda/

It probably an Adventist video so I apologise in advance for any offensive content…but it explains an interesting point about Angels and Demons, the film…I did a blog on this forum contending it was a good recruiting film for the Vatican…tho I was kinder about it that the persons on this video…I include it only for discussion purposes…as I say sorry for offensive content…

Shalom. May God bless all here. Michael.😉
Hi Brother,

Why would we discuss a random movie having nothing to do with SDAism on this thread? And incidentally, considering its source, it probably has very, very, very, very, very, very, very, little (did I say very?) to do with catholicism.

Again, sigh. Another SDA who would rather talk about catholicism than SDAism.

:o
 
brother,

I’ve reported your video to the mods. Please do us all a kindness and don’t post such rubbish here again.

If you have something beneficial or even debatable to discuss, I’m open to that.

Blessings,

HC
 
BOO!! Ha ha. Hi you all a real in the flesh…wooooo Seventh-day Adventist Christian!! Yeah me, real flesh and blood bona fide Adventist!! Hi greetings to all Romans on this blog.

I am known as brother2 but I also sign Michael to be more personal…I love Roman Catholic Christians and am reasonably clear on what you believe…not only from the perspective of Adventism…ok…um an open minded Adventist…is there any such thing? Yeah…me…brother2!!

Got an interesting Video for you to start us off…amazingdiscoveries.tv/media/431/Angels_and_Demons_The_Vatican_Agenda/

It probably an Adventist video so I apologise in advance for any offensive content…but it explains an interesting point about Angels and Demons, the film…I did a blog on this forum contending it was a good recruiting film for the Vatican…tho I was kinder about it that the persons on this video…I include it only for discussion purposes…as I say sorry for offensive content…

Shalom. May God bless all here. Michael.😉
I’ve been to SDA websites and viewed your propaganda before…Tell you what, I posted ern42 a link to a secular encyclopedia with a very short article on the council of Rome held in 382 AD. The council decided on what writings were considered scriptures, inspiried by God, and should be included in the cannon (that’s the Bible to you folks).But, he doesn’t seem interested in expanding his horizons. If you talk him into reading that short article then I’ll hold my nose and view your nonsense. Deal? If you guys want us to read your stuff, you should be ready to read ours too…It’s only fair don’t you think?
 
Hi Brother,

Why would we discuss a random movie having nothing to do with SDAism on this thread? And incidentally, considering its source, it probably has very, very, very, very, very, very, very, little (did I say very?) to do with catholicism.

Again, sigh. Another SDA who would rather talk about catholicism than SDAism.

:o
Greetings to you ‘happily catholic’!
😉
See Angels and Demons…a good recruiting film for the Roman Catholic Church…proud of a blog I started!!..many of your friends did discuss the film…😛

Glad you are happily catholic!! I am happily Adventist Christian…and have talked about Adventism at length on this forum and happy to do again, though I would refer you to Questions for Adventists blog, to save me some trouble rewriting all I wrote there…but aside from that…‘sigh’…ASK AWAY…

Shalom. May God bless all here. Michael.:cool:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top