C
Convert_in_99
Guest
Since I’m getting a hysterectomy soon, I’m just double checking. Even though there is 100% chance of not conceiving, it’s still okay to have marital relations, right? 
Thanks! I was pretty sure I read that somewhere but just double checking!Yes.
You remember wrong.Ummmm… if there is 100% chance of not-conceiving, then (if I remember correctly) it is not ok to have marital relations.
If there is even a slight chance, I would then think it is ok.
You may have to wait for someone smarter than myself to answer this, but this is just from what I remember.
Ok… Just two questions then.You remember wrong.
It is absolutely permissible to engage in normal marital relations even though the chance of conceiving is nil. This includes the elderly, the infertile, those who have had hysterectomies, AND surprise! those who intentionally and sinfully sterilized themselves.
Would you say a woman who is already pregnant shouldn’t have sex? She can’t get pregnant again.Ok… Just two questions then.
Also, the elderly and the infertile are not the same as hysterectomies because there is still a small chance of bringing forth life.
- What about the whole “open to children” statement during the Rite of Matrimony?
- Why don’t people just go get hysterectomies or the likes instead of being on contraceptives? A married couple is not supposed to have marital relations while using contraceptives because the option for life is not there. But this way they aren’t sinning gravely.
SorryOh brother. Why do my threads always end up bad. It was just a quick question, not an opening for a big debate.![]()
Thanks!You remember wrong.
It is absolutely permissible to engage in normal marital relations even though the chance of conceiving is nil. This includes the elderly, the infertile, those who have had hysterectomies, AND surprise! those who intentionally and sinfully sterilized themselves.
You’re funnyDude, I’m an old maid and even I know the answer is Yes, it is extremely okay for married people to have blessed marital union after the fact of those circumstances. You’re just happy (and a little hyper). Force yourself to relax!![]()
That’s why I asked. But it seems that it’s okay with the Church, so it’s okay by me.Ok… Just two questions then.
Also, the elderly and the infertile are not the same as hysterectomies because there is still a small chance of bringing forth life.
- What about the whole “open to children” statement during the Rite of Matrimony?
- Why don’t people just go get hysterectomies or the likes instead of being on contraceptives? A married couple is not supposed to have marital relations while using contraceptives because the option for life is not there. But this way they aren’t sinning gravely.
Good point!Would you say a woman who is already pregnant shouldn’t have sex? She can’t get pregnant again.
I don’t know. Should she?Would you say a woman who is already pregnant shouldn’t have sex? She can’t get pregnant again.
I thought I knew the answe, but being scrupulous I like to double check!Convert in 99,
You already know the answer!
And not surprisingly you’ve already been given misinformation by posting this question here. Posters on CAF will mean well but can be misinformed. You already know what the apologists on this site have to say, and you can contact the NCBC if you need further confirmation.
Now stop stressing about this and focus on the medical side of things. It sounds like you are heading towards a good resolution.
You do realize what’s involved in getting a hysterectomy right? :nope:Ok… Just two questions then.
Also, the elderly and the infertile are not the same as hysterectomies because there is still a small chance of bringing forth life.
- What about the whole “open to children” statement during the Rite of Matrimony?
- Why don’t people just go get hysterectomies or the likes instead of being on contraceptives? A married couple is not supposed to have marital relations while using contraceptives because the option for life is not there. But this way they aren’t sinning gravely.
Oh I’m not backing out of it that’s for sure!Convert in 99,
You already know the answer!
And not surprisingly you’ve already been given misinformation by posting this question here. Posters on CAF will mean well but can be misinformed. You already know what the apologists on this site have to say, and you can contact the NCBC if you need further confirmation.
Now stop stressing about this and focus on the medical side of things. It sounds like you are heading towards a good resolution.
Yes I do. Not in complete detail but in a general sense… yesYou do realize what’s involved in getting a hysterectomy right? :nope:
Because many people still have questions about the Faith that need to be answered. Your simple question is one that many people have and that some people actually struggle with or totally misunderstand.Oh brother. Why do my threads always end up bad. It was just a quick question, not an opening for a big debate.![]()
This ^Because many people still have questions about the Faith that need to be answered. Your simple question is one that many people have and that some people actually struggle with or totally misunderstand.