LeafByNiggle
Well-known member
How about inaction? Does that have a moral component? Because that is what we have now. It seems to me that while recommending some specific actions, the main thrust of the statement is to raise the importance of the issue for those who are content to do nothing.LeafByNiggle:![]()
The question of what specific actions will help quell gun violence has no moral component.Once again you rely on your private definition of “moral,” which allows you to classify statements about killing with a gun as having no moral component, while killing with a scalpel does. Most people would consider any statement about killing as having a moral component.
(As to the analogous issue, I could just as well say that specific politicians and their policies on abortion, or which specific law should be passed has no moral component. That is entirely a prudential matter.)