F
fin
Guest
Agree. Besides, BXVI said something before about HP being not okay. Of course I can claim to be better than him, but I am not. And yes, I used to read HP, I regret to say that.
Well, yes. Like you, I also like books that build worlds I can immerse myself in. I like The Count of Monte Cristo, I like the Sherlock Holmes stories, and I’m a fan of John le Carré’s spy thrillers. When I was a kid I immersed myself in the Tarzan books and in C. S. Forester’s Hornblower books. But there were other writers whose books somehow never grabbed me, either then or later, including both Tolkien and C. S. Lewis, who have already been mentioned on this thread.I like books which build worlds I can immerse myself in.
And this is why under 18 should not post on CAF.I take your point. I guess using the same line of thinking we could say it’s ok to read “The 50 Shades of Grey” too.
On a more serious note though, as the video in Seagulls post states, there are many Christians who have tried different aspects of what they have read to great detriment.
Thank you again!Happy cake day again
Really? A book about a boy going to a school of witchcraft has nothing to do with witchcraft?Harry Potter has little to nothing to do with actual witchcraft or wiccanism. The only questionable content is his divination class in later years, which is largely played for laughs. It’s a fun childrens/YA story, and if you are sound in yiur faith you’re fine.
Nope.Really? A book about a boy going to a school of witchcraft has nothing to do with witchcraft?
I think it should inspire one to research for oneself instead of relying on scaremongers.That alone should make people stop and think, hey…maybe this is a tad dangerous.
If you did the research yourself you would discover that the books and movies are not about Wicca, or the Craft; the children have an innate ability to do magic. They go to school to learn how to use it appropriately. Without it they would grow up and blow things up unintentionally.Also to another above poster…just because you were not personally encouraged to delve further into the occult does not mean another person who is more susceptible to such temptations may not be at a higher risk.
It is acceptable so children can read HP books and many others.There is just way too much in the Bible and God explicitly telling us NOT to even dabble in this kind of behavior.We need to separate the “fun” factor out of this and be realistic…why would you put yourself or child at risk when there are soooo many other acceptable fantasy themed fiction books out there to read?
No he didn’t. As Cardinal Ratzinger replied to a woman who sent him the book she wrote about the dangers of Harry Potter. He basically thanked her for the book and said it was good that the faithful be enlightened. One cannot be enlightened about a subject after being presented with misleading information. Also, note he did not say not one should read it. I doubt even ** after all this time** (please someone get that) the Pope Emeritus has read the books and is able to comment on on them knowledgeably.Besides, BXVI said something before about HP being not okay.
No witchcraft so no occult.The fact people so adamantly defend occultism is also a flag on the play for me…
Yes you are, albeit mildly.I am in no way fear mongering
True.I am just being realistic. Words do mean something. I do not think you know me well enough nor my background to know what research I may or may not have done nor my relation to the literary world…
False.I have posted nothing that is not true.
Do you actually think people like this exist? They aren’t Wiccan-wannabes dabbling using their mum’s spice rack.I will take the Word of God over the defense of a secular book about wizards and witches…
I am not sure who this Fr. Ripperger is but that was a weird clip…