L
Lou2U
Guest
No, they are not real spells. They’re made up, mashed-together bits of Latin.
Hon, you have every right not to read these books. You have every right to tell others that you don’t think they should read these books. What you do not have a right to do, is spread falsehoods.The spells contained in the books are actual spells that have been used by witches, satanists etc.
Ont the contrary, I have learned invaluable lessons on spiritual growth and the interior life as well as many other things from listening the Fr. Ripperger’s sermons.Fr. Ripperger seems to appeal to Catholics who want to find fault with others; it’s no way to grow in holiness but gives the illusion that one is because they are avoiding something he declares evil.
This is actually false, I won’t link to any, for obvious reasons, but a simple google search will show that such schools do in fact exist.Claim of witch schools - these do not exist. Lie number one.
Again, this is not true. Spells are basically asking demons (fallen angels) to do things for you. It appears as though the person saying the spell actually has magic powers, but it really is demons doing it. I would recommend searching up Zachary King, a former satanic high wizard who converted to Catholicism. He was literally the best in the world at magic for over a decade.Spells are real - they are made up bits of Latin. Lie number two.
I can’t find anything either. I’ll give you this one. However, that doesn’t mean that people still don’t do magic. I point back to Zachary King.Claim that woman burnt her house down after using the spell - proof?
I don’t see any evidence to back this up, and it also depends on what you mean by “witch.”Claims JK Rowling is a witch - Lie number three.
He’s saying that a fellow exorcist told him this.“Case of possession of five demons inspiring Rowling” again not something he was witness to or involved in so that can be dismissed