C
Convert3
Guest
I’d worry about this country if women were limited on the education they could have.
Respectfully fact, truth and not to offend…but questioning and examining…this question …Should women be treated as equals?.Are there negatives in a woman earning a degree?
Years of being unknown …now finally recognized… made into a movie truth…Meet the woman who really took man to the Moon… Katherine Johnson NASA mathematician who computed the path from here to the moon…woman computers before computers?
I beg your pardon?Well that’s that then
…Next!
Respectfully …are there negatives in a woman earning a degree, not according to the long long historical documents on the women who changed the world through their discoveries, inventions since the beginning of time and all throughout history to this very day right?..Are there negatives in a woman earning a degree?
People say a lot of things that we shouldn’t waste time on.Aparently a degree is one of the most devastating contraceptives there are. Or so it was said.
Yes.Should women be treated as equals?
There are pros and cons to anyone earning a degree.Are there negatives in a woman earning a degree?
Unfortunately, that school of though is gaining a lot of ground in the UK at the moment. There is an increasingly prevalent belief that education is useless unless it serves an immediate utilitarian purpose. That is why funding is being withdrawn from undergraduate courses in arts, humanities, and social sciences and redirected towards STEM subjects. We are becoming a country in which expertise in fields such as languages, literature, history, and philosophy are regarded as a luxury for the rich with no value to the society or to the individual.Getting a degree is only helpful if you can do something with it.
As an American, I agree with you.Unfortunately, that school of though is gaining a lot of ground in the UK at the moment. There is an increasingly prevalent belief that education is useless unless it serves an immediate utilitarian purpose. That is why funding is being withdrawn from undergraduate courses in arts, humanities, and social sciences and redirected towards STEM subjects. We are becoming a country in which expertise in fields such as languages, literature, history, and philosophy are regarded as a luxury for the rich with no value to the society or to the individual.
Someone could have a hobby centered around and there are many resources on history that are probably less expensive than a degree.So, returning to your point, it depends what you mean by “do something with it”. Is a degree in history, for example, only “helpful” if you want to become a history teacher? If that were to be the case, one would have to wonder about the purpose of history in education, since its only immediately obvious benefit would appear to be the production of another generation of history teachers. I suppose you could somewhat broaden out the benefits of an education in history to include museum curators, tour guides, people who make history documentaries for TV, and authors of historical novels. But I would argue that a history degree (or a degree in philosophy or English) has much broader benefits both for the individual student and for society as a whole. As well as lawyers, doctors, engineers, and architects, we also need people who preserve and contribute to our culture, memory, and identity and who possess the skills of critical inquiry necessary to sustain thing like good governance and a free press