J
jimmy
Guest
The church also says that it is good to fast on all fridays of the year, but that is not required. It is not disobedience to not fast on a friday in October.PS read the words of St Teresa in my signature.
The church also says that it is good to fast on all fridays of the year, but that is not required. It is not disobedience to not fast on a friday in October.PS read the words of St Teresa in my signature.
My understanding of the liturgical law in this case is as follows: the sign of peace is mandatory. Inviting the people to share the sign of peace with each other is optional. By that I mean that the priest may, for good reason, choose not to have the people share the sign of peace with each other. One reason I heard in San Francisco was that, in this particular church on weekdays, the people were spread out so far in the nave that it wasn’t practical (big church, small crowd). Another reason might be to avoid a free-for-all as people greet everyone in the church.So Deacon Ed, except for your corrections, can Jimmy’s premise below be considered correct?
You keep saying this, although many have shown that it is not optional.misericordie Maybe you forgot one point: The sign of peace at NO mass is optional according to the rubrics themselves. .
Fergal said:Sign of Peace
- According to IG 82 “The form for giving the sign of peace is left to the Conference of Bishops to determine”.
- The invitation to exchange the sign of peace may be omitted. According to IG 154 “the priest may add: *Let us offer one another a sign of peace”. *After the optional invitation, the instructions (to which I have added numbers) from IG 154 are:
- The priest may give the sign of peace to the ministers, always remaining with the sanctuary, lest the celebration be disrupted.
- He should do likewise if, for a good reason he wishes to offer the sign of peace to a few of the faithful.
- All, in accordance with the decisions of the Conference of Bishops, make a sign to one another that expresses peace, communion and charity.
- At least as translated, these instructions are confusing and seem to be contradictory. No 1 suggests exchanging the sign of peace is optional, No 3 that it is compulsory. No 1 requires the priest remain in the sanctuary, but No 2 allows him to exchange the sign of peace with the faithful, who would not normally be in the sanctuary.
replacesThe priest may give the sign of peace to the ministers, but always remains within the sanctuary, so as not to disturb the celebration. In the dioceses of the United States of America, for a good reason, on special occasions, (for example, in the case of a funeral, a wedding, or when civic leaders are present) the priest may offer the sign of peace to a few of the faithful near the sanctuary.
At the same time, in accord with the decisions of the Conference of Bishops, all offer one another a sign that expresses peace, communion, and charity. While the sign of peace is being given, one may say, Pax Domini sit semper vobiscum (The peace of the Lord be with you always), to which the response is Amen.The priest may give the sign of peace to the ministers but always remains within the sanctuary, so as not to disturb the celebration. In the dioceses of the United States of America, for a good reason, on special occasions (for example, in the case of a funeral, a wedding, or when civic leaders are present) the priest may offer the sign of peace to a few of the faithful near the sanctuary.
It is never an option for the congregation, if it is instructed by the Priest.Afterwards, when appropriate, the priest adds, Offerte vobis pacem (Let us offer each other the sign of peace).
I totally agree with you!!! Did mysty know that in the Archdiocese of St. Louis, recently Archbishop Burke (he is a great REAL Bishop) has recomended that the so called “sign of peace” be omitted during flu season??The sign of Peace is optional. It is not an abuse of the liturgy and it is not a sin to not participate in the sign of peace. It is not done in the Latin Mass or the eastern Liturgies.
This sign of peace was NOT even in the NO masses Immediately after V.II, it only came like around 1975.If I don’t want to shake someones hand at mass I don’t have to. There is no requirement in the GIRM or in the canon law or in the Catechism or anywhere that says I have to shake hands or hug or kiss or do anything. I have the choice to do it though.
Obviously if the preist can ommit it, it is not that important to follow.
You seem to confuse the obedience of a lay person with a consecrated religious. PLEASENot sure on that one—You are given an instruction. It is not up to you to decide whether or not it is a distraction. You were told to do it. Not major disobedience, but disobedience nevertheless.
Mysty101 said:
Here you go again! Would you like to just tell us who the fake bishops, priests, cardinals, catholics and religious orders are? You must apparently know of some since you are constantly deciding who the REAL ones are?I totally agree with you!!! Did mysty know that in the Archdiocese of St. Louis, recently Archbishop Burke (he is a great REAL Bishop) has recomended that the so called “sign of peace” be omitted during flu season??
What I do is CLOSE my eyes and KNEEL as soon as the priest says: “let us offer each other the sign of peace” :crying: . Or I take out a tissue and blow my nose.
which would be the priests jurisdiction. The priest says, “let us offer one another a sign of peace” and misericordie chooses to ignore. Do you also ignore the priest when he offers you peace? It would seem to follow your logic that this would also be optional since the whole sign of peace is!optional invitation
Gee all, I wonder what the word OPTIONAL means??? As to the 1975 peace sign: Every blue moon when I attend a NO Mass, a little before the point where fr. says Sign of peace: I grab a tissue out of my pocket and blow my nose as if I had the flue, not many want to shake my hand after this.:dancing: Well, as to your question, well the parish i DO go to when i DO ever decide to attend a NO Mass the order which runs it is very orthodox and well, out of the four young priests there, not ONE goes into the peace sign ritual: they Omit.Here you go again! Would you like to just tell us who the fake bishops, priests, cardinals, catholics and religious orders are? You must apparently know of some since you are constantly deciding who the REAL ones are?
It’s well within Archbishop Burke or even a priest to omit the sign of peace. The quesion here is are you free to ignore him if he chooses not to omit it? Where does it say it’s optional for the laity? In fact, I think it says which would be the priests jurisdiction. The priest says, “let us offer one another a sign of peace” and misericordie chooses to ignore. Do you also ignore the priest when he offers you peace? It would seem to follow your logic that this would also be optional since the whole sign of peace is!![]()
Hello! The word “OPTIONAL” is for the priest! He may, or may not, after having said “Peace be with you” and we respond “And also with you” - he MAY continue, “Let us offer each other a sign of peace”. That is where the option is, it is not for us. We are supposed to be obedient to the priest, and then offer each other a sign of peace. Blowing your nose is not being obedient to the priest, nor is it a sign of peace. It is a sign of rebellion!Gee all, I wonder what the word OPTIONAL means??? As to the 1975 peace sign: Every blue moon when I attend a NO Mass, a little before the point where fr. says Sign of peace: I grab a tissue out of my pocket and blow my nose as if I had the flue, not many want to shake my hand after this.:dancing: Well, as to your question, well the parish i DO go to when i DO ever decide to attend a NO Mass the order which runs it is very orthodox and well, out of the four young priests there, not ONE goes into the peace sign ritual: they Omit.![]()
Hey—thanks for popping inI am HOME!!
P.s. to all who don’t want to give the peace sign (reminds me of the 1960’s woodstock) and you DON’T have too, (OPTIONAL) my and MANY, MANY of my friends we are all in our twenties and thirties, is: WE ATTEND THE LATIN TRIDENTINE MASS: no hand shaky there. I remember when I atttended a NO mass once and during the peace sign the coir and fr. sang : “all we are saying, is give peace a chance.”![]()
![]()
:tsktsk:
:bigyikes:
(UMMM PEACE SIGN???).
Hmmm…I have yet to go to a mass where a priest has said “The peace of the Lord be with you always”. He is offering you peace. Somehow I think you answer “Et cum spiritu tuo.” Do you refuse the priest too? This part falls under the sign of peace. So, we’re back to you choosing which part you will do and which part you will not. The ONLY optional part about it is the “optional invitation” to the public. Note the word invitation. Last time I checked, the laity doesn’t do the invitation, the priest does. Once he chooses to give the invitation, can you tell me where it says the sign of peace is optional?Gee all, I wonder what the word OPTIONAL means??? As to the 1975 peace sign: Every blue moon when I attend a NO Mass, a little before the point where fr. says Sign of peace: I grab a tissue out of my pocket and blow my nose as if I had the flue, not many want to shake my hand after this.:dancing: Well, as to your question, well the parish i DO go to when i DO ever decide to attend a NO Mass the order which runs it is very orthodox and well, out of the four young priests there, not ONE goes into the peace sign ritual: they Omit.![]()
Actually (oh yes, you love all the words uttered by this pope even wheb he talk about hockey) the POPE HIMSELF has RECENTLY!!! Recomended the WIDER use of latin, IN THE NO MASS!! No, at the point where the priest (is he infallible in your opinion too?) says: The Lord be with you, do to the Horrible english translation, while some other say: “and also with you”, I (with all the rights I have as a Confirmed catholic age 33, and WELL EDUCATED in theology/degrees) say: AND WITH YOUR SPIRIT. When there is a bluse moon and I attend a NO mass that is. In other words: I literally translate from the Latin which is: Et Cum Spiritu Tuo=And with you spirit. Now When I go to THE Mass in Latin: and fr, says “Dominus Vobiscum” I say “Et Cum Spiritu Tuo” After all, yes, the POPE allows me too.:tiphat:Hmmm…I have yet to go to a mass where a priest has said “The peace of the Lord be with you always”. He is offering you peace. Somehow I think you answer “Et cum spiritu tuo.” Do you refuse the priest too? This part falls under the sign of peace. So, we’re back to you choosing which part you will do and which part you will not. The ONLY optional part about it is the “optional invitation” to the public. Note the word invitation. Last time I checked, the laity doesn’t do the invitation, the priest does. Once he chooses to give the invitation, can you tell me where it says the sign of peace is optional?