P
PaulDupre
Guest
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/201e7/201e7f2a0c1da9182cb66c40762d3eb6dd376741" alt="40.png"
Thanks, Todd. I appreciate your insights as well.One of the best descriptions I’ve read. I’m glad you, and others like you that write with eloquence are here. Nice work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dd6/a0dd67a17ec8b6e6bcb45d7047f3d9bfe87084bb" alt="Slightly smiling face :slight_smile: 🙂"
God bless you,
Paul
Thanks, Todd. I appreciate your insights as well.One of the best descriptions I’ve read. I’m glad you, and others like you that write with eloquence are here. Nice work.
if you follow your feelings and not reason founded on natural law, you’ll be lead to your doom. feelings are what make people sin.Ignore the evidence, damn the contradictions, it’s all about my feelings.
I’m not certain this is authentic Roman Catholic teaching–nor has it been for at least a couple of hundred years. The theory of 'Incincible Ignorance" has prevailed at least so far back as the apologetics of Cardinal Newman, so far as I recollect. This assumes sincere and good-hearted belief, sincere and perfect contrition for sin as one understands one’s sins, and an absolutely invincible antipathy towards the Roman Catholic institution, even though one would indeed become a Catholic if one could somehow come to the knowledge that Catholicism were true. All this is so deeply rooted in the interior predisposition of the individual that even the individual cannot know his/her status before God.if you follow your feelings and not reason founded on natural law, you’ll be lead to your doom. feelings are what make people sin.
either way, i love those crazy mormons.
“Unless you become as little children ye cannot enter the Kingdom of God” . . .“Unless ye have faith as a little child, ye cannot be saved”. Very bad paraphrases I’m sure but these are the justification for the practice. Almost everyone tortures their kids with some sort of obligatory and premature affirmation of faith. Mormons aren’t unique. Think of the words “Christmas Play”.Off topic here but I wanted to add to this my own experience. I have witnessed this also at their fast and testimony meetings many times. The mom brings up her todler, puts him on the microphone, then kneels down next to him and whispers into his ear the “testimony” he has her repeat to the congregation. This is how their kids learn about bearing testimonies. I can’t fathom why this is condoned. A testimony is a personal thing and cannot be dictated, and bearing one is certainly voluntary. Mormons don’t think twice about this practice. I’m not sure if this is also done with the kids at the primary classes.
Really?One other thing about the bearing of testimonies at LDS sacrament meetings. I have never seen a Mormon get up and bear their testimony that they know the Bible is true.
flameburns623 said:“Unless you become as little children ye cannot enter the Kingdom of God” . . .“Unless ye have faith as a little child, ye cannot be saved”. Very bad paraphrases I’m sure but these are the justification for the practice. Almost everyone tortures their kids with some sort of obligatory and premature affirmation of faith. Mormons aren’t unique. Think of the words “Christmas Play”.![]()
animals follow their feelings or instinct. we use reason to test our feelings. but always reason first, not emotion or feelings. if we let our feelings run our life, we behave as animals and forfeit our inheritance as children of God. the church still teaches this. it is all about concupiscence, something which only the catholic church seems to recognize.I’m not certain this is authentic Roman Catholic teaching–nor has it been for at least a couple of hundred years.
That’s a nice attitude and I salute you for it. I agree that most rank-and-file Mormons are simply deceived and don’t know any better.To Paul D. and others: we don’t disagree that Mormonism is a deception. I simply wish, in Christian charity, to ascribe to individual Mormons the best possible interpretation of their motivations, since I cannot know their hearts. Like Oat Soda I love Mormons, just not Mormonism.
Brigham Young Discourses, 19:38
PaulCode:"Oliver Cowdery went with the prophet Joseph when he deposited these plates. Joseph did not translate all of the plates; there was a portion of them sealed, which you can learn from the book of Doctrine and Covenants. When Joseph got the plates, the angel instructed him to carry them back to the hill Cumorah, which he did. Oliver says that when Joseph and Oliver went there, the hill opened and they walked into a cave, in which there was a large and spacious room. He says he did not think, at the time, whether they had the light of the sun or artificial light; but that it was just as light as day. They laid the plates on a table; it was a large table that stood in the room. Under this table there was a pile of plates as much as two feet high, and there were altogether in this room more plates than probably many wagon loads; they were piled up in the corners and along the walls. The first time they went there the sword of Laban hung upon the wall; but when they went again it had been taken down and laid upon the table across the gold plates; it was unsheathed, and on it was written these words: "This sword will never be sheathed again until the kingdoms of this world become the kingdom of our God and his Christ." I tell you this as coming not only from Oliver Cowdery, but others who were familiar with it, and who understood it just as well as we understand coming to this meeting enjoying the day, and by and by we separate and go away, forgetting most of what is said, but remembering some things."
I don’t think you’ll get much response. It seems the LDS people here have disappeared.Speaking of BOM evidence, what do present-day Mormons make of the claim that the Hill Cumorah (where Joseph found the gold plates) is full of “wagon loads” of metal plates, swords and other stuff? Why haven’t they ever excavated the hill?
If they found all that stuff, it would be proof positive that Joseph’s claims were true. If they don’t want to disturb the site (which I believe is now owned by the LDS Church), I suggest using ground-penetrating radar to establish that the hill is indeed hollow and contains ancient human artifacts.
Here is one of many accounts of this:
Paul
Tums, Father, you want Tums.Santa isn’t real? But I have a burning in my bosom that he is real. The milk and cookies disappear every year. There is even chiasmus in the poem The Night Before Christmas. You infidel!
We have no reason to believe that an excavation would be successful. The New York hill is geologically not the type to support caves. Current mormon thinking places the* real* Hill Cumorah somewhere else, contrary to what many past generations of mormons have assumed.Speaking of BOM evidence, what do present-day Mormons make of the claim that the Hill Cumorah (where Joseph found the gold plates) is full of “wagon loads” of metal plates, swords and other stuff?
Paul
They have their hill(s), we have ours. Ours is blessed by the Cross and the Incarnate Savior Who died there. Their’s is blessed by endless JWian changes and revisions.The real one is somewhere else? Other then where Smith originally found the alleged plates? How utterly convienent. But I will be fair. Pick any hill in New York that you like and dig up something that shows there were Hebrew civilizations, ala BOM, in the new world. Then I will call and have the missionaries come to give me the lessons. But if you don’t find anything then I get to give you our lessons.
Yes, and this idea has been kicked around for awhile, at least since '81. The LDS church has never had an official geography for the Book of Mormon so a close reading of the text allows us to revise our thinking.The real one is somewhere else? .
I will have to respectfully decline your invitation to dig up New York, since I don’t believe that is where the action is. Furthermore I lack archaeological skills, governmental digging permits, or funding. And finally even if convincing evidence is found for Book of Mormon people and places, we are still free to treat the Book’s teachings as mythology.Other then where Smith originally found the alleged plates? How utterly convienent. But I will be fair. Pick any hill in New York that you like and dig up something that shows there were Hebrew civilizations, ala BOM, in the new world. Then I will call and have the missionaries come to give me the lessons. But if you don’t find anything then I get to give you our lessons.
Nice to see you back again. Thought you had disappeared on us. This statement of yours baffles me. Are you saying that you believe the BoM to be mythology? As in, that the contents are not actually true? If this is the case WHY would you remain LDS???And finally even if convincing evidence is found for Book of Mormon people and places, we are still free to treat the Book’s teachings as mythology.
The day the archaeologists dig up indisuputable evidences of the Nephite or Lamanite civilization–there will be a mad rush of conversions to Mormonism which will simply overwhelm the LDS missionary program. Remember how the Book of Mormon was revealed: a semi-litterate young man from hicksville, New York, claimed to translate the book by the power of God. NO matter what other goofy things Joseph Smith said or did in his lifetime, if his word on this issue alone would be confirmed–you simply couldn’t hold back the crowds who would flock into the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.I can take you to Jerusalem. In fact I am going there soon. It is mentioned in our Bible. Please find one hill, some hill, any hill, where you can dig up something, anything, that proves BOM archeology. It would have to be accepted by non-mormon archeologists. It is so little to ask. I am sure New Yorkers would be happy to have a new tourist attraction, so start digging.