D
De_Maria
Guest
I’m out. Thanks for the discussion.
Judged by-or else the reconciliation doesn’t quite work.Indeed one of our desired trademarks, by which we will be known by.
So long as one doesn’t take the signs of reconciliation as the means of it.Judged by (love)-or else the reconciliation doesn’t quite work.
So long as one understands that Sola Caritas is the name of the game in defining man’s justice upon which he’ll be judged; then the gospel is understood. This is what faith is meant to achieve. The reconciliation I was speaking of, of course, involved reconciling teachings and statements found in Scripture. Reconciliation between man and God comes as man comes to know the true God, and enter communion with Him, via faith. Paul went to great pains to explain that without interior conversion to the living God, any outward show of righteousness was based on self; it was self-“righteousness”. To be “under the law” is to be made aware of God’s law, yet to still be operating under ones own efforts to fulfill it. To be “under grace” means to cohabit with God, to live by the Spirit as man was made to do, a relationship that Adam spurned, which enables us to fulfill the law by the righteousness that His presence accomplishes in us as we continue to abide in Him as opposed to the world, a righteousness most fully defined by the term love. So keeping in mind that love is to be the motive behind man’s authentic righteousness, as it is with Christ who’s the source of our love and the works that love naturally seeks to do, these statements are easily reconciled with each other:So long as one doesn’t take the signs of reconciliation as the means of it.
Throughout history, people have done things IN SPITE of Catholic Teaching. Not because of it.How can the catholic church not teach error in morals when it hides, covers up for, and protects the perverts within its own ranks?
No it doesn’t.It comes straight out of their catechism #969.
Show me where that says by Mary ALONE? Do you need for me to quote the statement that you claimed came directly from this teaching?[969] "This motherhood of Mary in the order of grace continues uninterruptedly from the consent which she loyally gave at the Annunciation and which she sustained without wavering beneath the cross, until the eternal fulfillment of all the elect. Taken up to heaven she did not lay aside this saving office but by her manifold intercession continues to bring us the gifts of eternal salvation . . . . Therefore the Blessed Virgin is invoked in the Church under the titles of Advocate, Helper, Benefactress, and Mediatrix."512
Wow, I thought I did answer it and am looking for clarification from you.Answer my question. You and your anti-Catholic friends like to misrepresent Catholic Teaching and then deny it. Where does the Cathechism say from “Mary’s love alone” as you assert and defend?