Again, one can feel sorry for Judas, and indeed for all, who have sinned. Actually, this means we can and should feel sorrow for all of us, since all have sinned.
The Catholic Church does not teach that any person (even Judas) is known to be in hell, whereas it does teach that certain individuals are known to be in heaven. True.
But, feeling sorrow, and compassion, do not mean that we make assumptions (due to those feelings) that particular beings (like Judas) can somehow
not be in hell, because it would make us feel too bad to think of people being damned for reasons we think are inadequate, any more than we make assumptions that certain beings (like Hitler) can somehow
not be in heaven, because it would make us feel too bad that somebody so evil would ever be capable of being forgiven.
We are not more compassionate than God. Neither are we more just than He.
It is one thing to hope that Judas repented (and posters have noted correctly that there is indeed a difference between repentence and remorse. In repentence, one is sorry for the offense against another; in remorse, one is sorry for oneself instead of, or to a higher degree than, being sorry for the offense), although there is no real biblical evidence that he did so. Repudiation of one’s actions does not indicate that one fully repents those actions. Confession to the pharisees is not confession to God, and Judas did not ask the pharisees to absolve him.
True compassion, like true love, does not attempt to deny reality. If Judas died in a state of mortal sin (and this we do not know), then he is in hell, and no amount of compassion or sorrow can change this. And certainly trying to rehabilitate him into
argued that Judas was a lesser Chosen One??
seems to me not a matter of feeling compassion for Judas so much as it seems a questioning of God’s justice** if** Judas is indeed damned, based on the feeling that Judas’ actions somehow were not only not worthy of damnation, but were indeed not only necessary but almost praiseworthy. This is not only not Catholic teaching, but indeed seems to me to verge on near blasphemy, in attempting to make an action of treachery into an action of honor.
Like true love for those in particular sins (homosexuals who are sexually active, heterosexuals who are sexually active outside a valid marriage, those seeking or aiding abortion, those who lie, cheat, steal, bear false witness, etc.), the acknowledgment of the sin’s gravity does not mean that we
hate the sinner by pointing out that gravity.
Some would say that calling sins
sins is not loving, because it hurts peoples’ feelings, and that God loves us no matter what we do. This is more a non sequiter. Yes, God loves us no matter what. But no, God will not save us if we choose to damn ourselves.
Yes, God loves the sinner, but He does not give the sinner a free pass
because He has compassion on them. The sinner has to acknowledge his sin and to atone for the sin.
Making it appear that God will let any sin go by, because
He is compassionate ignores the fact that He is just as well.