H
hoosierdaddy
Guest
All that eventually became the New Testament. It hadn’t all been written down yet. But now it has been.funny. He said either by an oral statement or by a letter of ours. What does oral statement mean?
All that eventually became the New Testament. It hadn’t all been written down yet. But now it has been.funny. He said either by an oral statement or by a letter of ours. What does oral statement mean?
(Edited by Moderator)If you manage to convince anyone it says more about their gullibility than the glory of God, the work of the Holy Spirit or any ability on your part either!
In the words of “Philthy”, thank you for showing us the fruit of salvation by your words.So the Catholic faith is the Holy Spirit-led truth for those of us who choose to be Catholic and your - whatever-the-heck you are - is the Holy-Spirit-led truth for those who listen to it?
Seems your idea of the Holy Spirit is about as wishy-washy and useless as the rest of your ‘knowledge’.
I love the LordOriginally Posted by lak611
How do you know that you have the Holy Spirit dwelling inside of you? What are the signs?
This is just not true. You will ALWAYS have the Holy Spirit within you if you ARE saved. The Holy Spirit never leaves you. I’m a bit upset that you said “you can have the Holy Spirit again if you return (to the Church and confess your sins to a priest)”. That is unbiblical and false. Much as you seem like a nice person I could not let this go unchallenged.I received the Holy Spirit in my Baptism, and was given the increase and deepening of His grace in Confirmation. I know that I will always have the Holy Spirit in me as long as I am free from mortal sin. If I do commit mortal sin, all I need to do is receive absolution from a priest in the Sacrament of Penance, and I will have the Holy Spirit dwelling in me again. You said that you were a Catholic. You can have the Holy Spirit again if you return to the Church and confess your sins to a priest.
This is not directed at me but I wanted to comment on your question.Please consider the way I word this question…
Is it possible for more than one church to be completely correct? In other words, can there be more than one “TRUTH”?
2 tim 3:16 says ALL Scripture, NOT only Scripture. He doesn’t say that ONLY Scripture is God breathed.2tim3:16
And the canon was closed with the death of the apostle john in 100ad.
No, not agreed, since this is a false dichotomy. Catholics do not believe that it is Oral Tradtions vs. The Bible. It is BOTH Oral Traditions AND The Bible.Again, if you would like be be under oral statements fine. I will be guided by epistles. From what we are discussing it seems that you can be led by oral traditions or sacred traditions and I could be lead by epistles and the bible. So according to the bible you are perfectly fine with your oral traditions and I am fine with my bible, agreed?
That isn’t the point. The point is that the action is taken based on the faith of the child’s parents. Same thing with baptism. Your doctrine of not baptizing infants is actually extrabiblical.Infants do not have to be circumsized.Rom 2:25
Not so. See, the Bible nowhere COMMANDS us to baptize infants. I am different than the normal Baptist though where I don’t believe it matters. I was baptized again but even if I hadn’t been it would not matter. The fact is I was baptized when I was an infant and I came to faith when I was older. Both “requirements” so to speak were fulfilled. Baptism is a good thing but does the timing of it REALLY matter in the overall scheme of things? I don’t think so.That isn’t the point. The point is that the action is taken based on the faith of the child’s parents. Same thing with baptism. Your doctrine of not baptizing infants is actually extrabiblical.
I wouldn’t call it hostile, but I would say that I will never be Catholic again. I may change in my views about the Catholic Church, and depending on what I have learned and will learn, may choose the Orthodox faith, or some Protestant faith. But I will not be Catholic again.You are entitled to your opinion. I am not open to discuss this with you because I know you have a total disagreement with the Catholic Church, which I see is very hostile. I may want to discuss this issue on a later time.
Am I missing something because I haven’t read some earlier posts?So I have not decided anything yet, except a few groups I will not be part of (Catholic, Calvinist, United Pentecostal, any group that cannot say the Nicene Creed).
As has been pointed out, we do say it, … NEXT !!!So I have not decided anything yet, except a few groups I will not be part of (Catholic, Calvinist, United Pentecostal, any group that cannot say the Nicene Creed).
This thread was originally a discussion about Fatima, but it goes beyond that - there are probably more than 10 topics being discussed in this thread. Starting out “Catholics worshiping Mary”…Am I missing something because I haven’t read some earlier posts?
We (Catholics) say the Nicene Creed at Mass so why do you include us in your grouping of those who do not say it.
So if St. Paul can refer to something that hasn’t been written down, why can’t we do the same? Also, Tradition (with a big T) was just proven by this statement. Sacred Tradition is what preserved the sayings of Jesus, and the Acts of the Apostles until they were written down well after Jesus rose again. Jesus rose c. 29-33 AD, and the Gospel of Mark, the earliest Gospel to be written, was not written till c. 70 AD. That’s a 40 year gap. How were they preserved if only by mouth? (bell dings). That’s right, it’s the Holy Spirit! The Holy Spirit not only inspires writers, but speakers as well. How did the early Church between 30-70AD function without the New Testament? BTW, where did we get the idea of the Trinity? Not in the Bible. So how did we arrive at the Trinity?All that eventually became the New Testament. It hadn’t all been written down yet. But now it has been.
There should be a big deal about the Nicene Creed, or any creed for that matter. Catholic Church came up with them. The Creeds mention the Trinity, which is not found anywhere in the Bible, but because of Sacred Tradition, we believe in it. Also, the Apostle’s Creed talks of Purgatory and praying for the dead and praying to the living saints. So yes, you should have a huge problem as a protestant with this.I myself say creeds but they are not Scripture. They are statements summarized from Scripture but they are not Scripture. So what’s the big deal about creeds?
New thread and topic. But maybe you could make one and show me where in scripture it tells you it has all been written down now?All that eventually became the New Testament. It hadn’t all been written down yet. But now it has been.
Maybe I could. Forgive me if I don’t though. I’ll think about it. I don’t understand though, why you guys haven’t come across that concept in reading the Bible. If we have, how come you haven’t?New thread and topic. But maybe you could make one and show me where in scripture it tells you it has all been written down now?