M
Mannyfit75
Guest
newbie, John died in 101 A.D.So to be a Christian, I don’t have to espouse any revelation given to anybody after the canon was closed after Johns death in 99ad.?
newbie, John died in 101 A.D.So to be a Christian, I don’t have to espouse any revelation given to anybody after the canon was closed after Johns death in 99ad.?
mea culpa.John, the Apostle died in 101 A.D. in Ephesus.
There is no new revelation. I said the accounts of the saint is a private revelation, which is not new revelation.So to be a Christian, I don’t have to espouse any revelation given to anybody after the canon was closed after Johns death in 99ad.?
I’ll just stick to my bible and let the Holy Spirit fill in the blanks. thanks thoughnewbie,
The movie the Passion of Christ was based on St. Anne Catherine Emmerich
If you want to take a look at it go ahead.
sacred-texts.com/chr/pjc/index.htm
I read a the book and finished it. It helps with spiritual grow but overall, it does contain a lot of Catholic themes. I believe some of it but not all of it.
I question some of the details of the Last Supper which much doubt.
Not so fast there grasshopper :ehh:So actually we believe the same thing.
As a Christian:
I do not have to have statues in my house or church.
I do not have to kneel or pray to statues.
I do not have to pray to mary or ask for her intervention.
I do not have to ask saints for intervention.
When my church shares communion we are partaking in the body and blood of Christ.
I do not have to go to a confessional to repent of my sins. I can go directly to God.
We are in accord. Problem solved!
So if there is no new revelation since John, does that include what the popes have to say also?There is no new revelation. I said the accounts of the saint is a private revelation, which is not new revelation.
Let’s not be mixing, and adding, and attempting to put words into my mouth, newbie.So actually we believe the same thing.
As a Christian:
I do not have to have statues in my house or church.
I do not have to kneel or pray to statues.
I do not have to pray to mary or ask for her intervention.
I do not have to ask saints for intervention.
When my church shares communion we are partaking in the body and blood of Christ.
I do not have to go to a confessional to repent of my sins. I can go directly to God.
We are in accord. Problem solved!
So can I or can’t I confess my sins to God and ask for forgiveness alone in my room?Not so fast there grasshopper :ehh:
What makes you think you don’t have to go to a confessional?
When you want to be baptised do you go by yourself and jump into the nearest river or pool? Or do you make sure a minister of the Lord is present to confer the sacrament upon you?
When you want communion do you simply grab the Wonderloaf out of your fridge and the wine out of your bar and get stuck into them? Or do you again receive this sacrament in the presence and through the intermediary actions of the minister, who usually (in my experience anyway) is the one to recite the Lord’s words over the bread and wine?
When you want to marry do you just take your intended by the hand and carry her over the threshold with no further ceremony, or do you again go into the presence of a minister of the Lord who as his agent pronounces the words of blessing upon your marriage?
Why then do you think God’s forgiveness is a solo act between you and God alone? What makes you think that, in the same way, it ALSO is not conferred through the words and agency of a minister of the Lord?
So when I celebrate communion and remember Jesus death and resurrection it is somehow false.And I am somehow LESS blessed than you because I pray directly to God The Father and I don’t have Mary or a saint speaking for me.And God will not forgive my sins if I pray directly to Him and ask forgiveness. Is this what you believe?Let’s not be mixing, and adding, and attempting to put words into my mouth, newbie.
You don’t need statues, nor do I. We have already established that Catholics don’t pray to statues. But you can, of course, have them–unless you’re an iconoclast who cannot tell the difference between a work of art (a ‘representation’ or image, not a 'real thing) and an idol.
Catholics do not pray to, or kneel to, statues. If we did, why wouldn’t we say so, and be proud of it, and give reasons to justify it? Are there any other religions around who practice something and aren’t both secure in their practice and perfectly willing to explain why they do it? Why do you think Catholics would be any different, especially when it comes to things we really DO PRACTICE–like saying a rosary–we come out PROUDLY and give reasons for saying it.
You don’t have to pray to Mary but why you would neglect talking to the Mother of God is beyond me, when you certainly have respect for His Father. . .And you don’t have to ask anybody for intercession. It’s your choice–your loss, though.
Ditto for the saints. Here are people like Peter, Paul, etc. whose words we listen to in Scripture, yet you don’t apparently want to make any further acquaintance of them–it’s a puzzle but hey, if you want to go it alone. . .
Sorry, but unless your church has priests who have valid orders and apostolic succession, you don’t have “body and blood” but only crackers and grape juice. You have a ‘memorial’ but not the True Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity. 2000 years of Catholics and Orthodox are united in this teaching from the apostles.
You can repent of your sins (I hope we all do) but you can only hope that your repentence “to God” instead of “to God through a priest who acts for God in accordance with SCRIPTURAL MANDATE” is a perfect contrition. Especially since you are, still, a Catholic, and claim that you were thoroughly and properly taught. Ignorance does not appear to be a valid excuse in your case although only God can say for certain.
Problem solved? No indeed, my friend. Your problems are very dire indeed and you have my fervent prayers for a renewal of the True Faith and your return to it. May God be with you.
What the Pope say in his Ecyclicals or when he addresses Ex-Cathedra does not contradict Scripture.So if there is no new revelation since John, does that include what the popes have to say also?
So do I have to follow the revelation given to men after the canon was closed or not? Can I be a good Christian by following the canon of the bible and disregard anything that came after?What the Pope say in his Ecyclicals or when he addresses Ex-Cathedra does not contradict Scripture.
You forgot that in Catholicism, the Word of God was revealed to us in orally (word of mouth), and written (scripture). The Scripture used by the Apostles was the OT, and the NT didn’t came until 50 -125 A.D.
You follow the revelation of Jesus Christ who gave Peter, the Keys to built his Church, which is the Catholic Church. The CC gave us the Bible we see today.So do I have to follow the revelation given to men after the canon was closed or not? Can I be a good Christian by following the canon of the bible and disregard anything that came after?
I am just looking for scriptural foundation in these posts.
For bible studies I go to non denominational sources. Thanks for chiming in though.
Yet you only rely on non-denominational sources for the interpretation of Holy Scripture?I’ll just stick to my bible and let the Holy Spirit fill in the blanks. thanks though
As James says in his Epistle, ‘the prayers of a righteous man availeth much’. Mary and the saints are those of God’s followers who are already in heaven - of their surpassing righteousness we can be absolutely certain because of this. It’s madness not take advantage of their aid which is so powerful.So when I celebrate communion and remember Jesus death and resurrection it is somehow false.And I am somehow LESS blessed than you because I pray directly to God The Father and I don’t have Mary or a saint speaking for me.And God will not forgive my sins if I pray directly to Him and ask forgiveness. Is this what you believe?
You follow the revelation of Jesus Christ who gave Peter, the Keys to built his Church, which is the Catholic Church. The CC gave us the Bible we see today.
Timeline of the Canon of Scripture. The Church got its authority from the Apostles, and the Apostles got their authority from Jesus, and Jesus got his authority from God, the Father.
The Church is the only authorized one who can interpret Scripture
Do you really feel that if you read the scripture you cannot interpret what it means?
In the case of believing in the Trinity, you would in fact be required to believe in the Trinity to be a Christian at all.So do I have to follow the revelation given to men after the canon was closed or not? Can I be a good Christian by following the canon of the bible and disregard anything that came after?
Let me quote Peter himself in 2 Peter Chapter 3 verse 15-18.You follow the revelation of Jesus Christ who gave Peter, the Keys to built his Church, which is the Catholic Church. The CC gave us the Bible we see today.
Timeline of the Canon of Scripture. The Church got its authority from the Apostles, and the Apostles got their authority from Jesus, and Jesus got his authority from God, the Father.
The Church is the only authorized one who can interpret Scripture
Do you really feel that if you read the scripture you cannot interpret what it means?
Most of What I read can be interpreted easily. I take it all literally.Prophecy and the parables are very figurative and I need help there. But the Gospels, epistles, and OT historical accounts can be taken literally for the most part. No need for much interpretation.Yet you only rely on non-denominational sources for the interpretation of Holy Scripture?
So you are not in fact “sticking to your bible” and letting the Holy Spirit fill in the blanks. You are relying on the interpretation of someone else.
I actully don’t have a problem with you sticking with your non-denominational bible studies, but respectfully, you are not relying on your bible and the leading of the Holy spirit to fill in the blanks if you choose to only use non-denominational studies. Clearly you are relying on the interpretation espoused by “nondenominational” people if you only choose to do those studies.
Respectfully,
Maria
Mannyfit75;1820569:
We can try, just as we can read an Ernest Hemingway book and try to figure out from reading it what he meant.You follow the revelation of Jesus Christ who gave Peter, the Keys to built his Church, which is the Catholic Church. The CC gave us the Bible we see today.
Timeline of the Canon of Scripture. The Church got its authority from the Apostles, and the Apostles got their authority from Jesus, and Jesus got his authority from God, the Father.
The Church is the only authorized one who can interpret Scripture
Do you really feel that if you read the scripture you cannot interpret what it means?
But Ernest Hemingway has children and grandchildren alive today with whom he discussed his work. If THEY tell us what they know he meant by it, surely we should trust their interpretation over our own ideas?
Why do you think the Ethiopian in Acts went to the Apostle Philip for Philip’s interpretation of Isaiah rather than simply reading it on his own? Why did the Disciples on the road to Emmaus not understand the scriptures properly until Christ himself went thoroughly through them ‘from Moses onward’ with them?
Why did Christ stay with the Apostles for 40 days after his resurrection to continue teaching them instead of just handing them a copy of the Scriptures and saying ‘here they are, now that you’ve been blessed with my Holy Spirit you don’t need to be taught anything further by me - figure it out on your own!’