J
JamesTheJust
Guest
How cool! I had wondered why your posts were always blue, but I never bothered to ask.I use a slightly larger font and it’s always blue in honor of my devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary.
How cool! I had wondered why your posts were always blue, but I never bothered to ask.I use a slightly larger font and it’s always blue in honor of my devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary.
How cool! I had wondered why your posts were always blue, but I never bothered to ask.![]()
Our Blessed Mother sure is wondrous, isn’t she?It’s all her “fault” I reverted. See My Testimony .
Gotta say Great Post!!!The issue here is authority to insure that doctrine is correct and scripture is not misinterpreted. We have a scripturally documented establishment of that authority that has functioned for some 2,000 years. Protestants seek to replace that with their appeal to a Sola Scriptura based view of the Bible, which has resulted in a wide variety of (mis)interpretations that has led to even more errant doctrines that no one in any of the n-C communities has any authority to even begin to correct, which has created tremendous confusion among people who sincerely seek the truth of Christianity. If, as I pointed out before, God is not a god of confusion (as plainly stated in the New Testament), then how can that system be of God? It doesn’t make sense, and it doesn’t work well at all.
Something to note about his usage of the term Catholic Church. He wrote this in the early 100’s. And note how he uses the term. He uses is casually, with absolutely NO explanation or illumination as to what he means by the term. So he is VERY confident that his audience is very familiar with the term and what he means by it. So this term must have been in use and familiar for a LONG time before he wrote this letter.It doesn’t matter what modern men define the church as, but we know for a fact that the early church defined the church as the Catholic Church because we have Ignatius of Antioch, (their bishop no less and a disciple of St. John the Evangelist) plainly saying so in his Epistle to the Smyrnaeans where he says, "Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude[of the people] also be; by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude[of the people] also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church."
2 Peter 1:19 So we have the prophetic word made more sure, to which you do well to pay attention as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star arises in your hearts. 20 But know this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one’s own interpretation, 21 for no prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God.Each person is free to read and interpret Scripture on their own.
It means that Peter is in authority in a special way distinct from the other Apostles. Also look to the prayer that Jesus prays for Peter that he will strengthen his brethren. And Jesus also commands him individually to feed, tend, and feed His sheep.Matthew 16:18-19 "And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”
What does it mean for Peter to have the keys of the kingdom of heaven? Jesus also gave the authority to bind and loose to the other apostles (Matthew 18:18), so concerning Peter, what is the difference between having the keys of heaven and having the authority to bind and loose?
(I looked at Wikipedia and the Catholic encyclopedia and haven’t got much help, so I would appreciate any response.)
Thanks,
icamhif
I am glad that you are.Yup – I AM still here – .
Read the rest of the article here Catholic EncyclopediaThe term church (Anglo-Saxon, cirice, circe; Modern German, Kirche; Swedish, Kyrka) is the name employed in the Teutonic languages to render the Greek ekklesia (ecclesia), the term by which the New Testament writers denote the society founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ. The derivation of the word has been much debated. It is now agreed that it is derived from the Greek kyriakon (cyriacon), i.e. the Lord’s house, a term which from the third century was used, as well as ekklesia, to signify a Christian place of worship. This, though the less usual expression, had apparently obtained currency among the Teutonic races. The Northern tribes had been accustomed to pillage the Christian churches of the empire, long before their own conversion. Hence, even prior to the arrival of the Saxons in Britain, their language had acquired words to designate some of the externals of the Christian religion.
2 Peter 1:20 says otherwise.All I’m doing is presenting ‘my’ interpretation to who ever is listening on this thread – That Hardly constitutes Me trying to share my view with the ‘world’. Each person is free to read and interpret Scripture on their own.
Yes, the Church is run by the Pope.And in response to ‘whomever’ – of course, every club, group, organization has a leader. That’s a given. A person in charge, another person to take that person’s place if they can’t be there and a secretary to keep track of business. And obviously a church group is the same way.
The Moderator is the one who decided to take your off topic subject and make a new thread. It isn’t so much about him but about his and evidently your thoughts on what the Keys given to Peter are and who holds them.Another comment – Trying to clear up a Big misunderstanding - Again. As for Mike Gendron – I found One article from him – No Clue as to who he is – I’m NOT a ‘follower’ of him. I’d found the same article from other research. There was really No need to start a side thread regarding him – Don’t know him – don’t Plan to. Okay? Thank you![]()
Correct!The Moderator is the one who decided to take your off topic subject and make a new thread. It isn’t so much about him but about his and evidently your thoughts on what the Keys given to Peter are and who holds them.
However, it is obvious that there was only one church, not the thousands that exist today. So that doesn’t help you much.Yup – I AM still here – Trying to establish what the Church is. When it came into being…
All of this was After Jesus Christ had ascended back to His Father in heaven. The ‘church’ being referred to Here is at Jerusalem. But due to the persecution – the people were scattered to those other regions vs 4 says they continued to ‘preach the word’
You messed up here. How much Greek do you know? Let me just show you this verse in the Greek because it’s important and relevant. h men oun ekklhsia kaq olhV thV ioudaiaV kai galilaiaV kai samareiaV eicen eirhnhn oikodomoumenh kai poreuomenh tw fobw tou kuriou kai th paraklhsei tou agiou pneumatoV eplhqunetoActs 9:31 – after Sauls conversion he was speaking boldly in the name of the Lord Jesus …vs 31 “Then the churches throughout all Judea, Galilee, and Samaria had peace and were edified. And walking in the fear of the Lord and in the company of the Holy Spirit they were multiplied.”
Again, doesn’t help you much. In fact, as I said before, there was only the eon church, and it was the early church bishop of that same church who wrote the letter to Smyrna calling it “the Catholic Church”, so you should probably consider that as well.Acts 13 " Now in the church that was at Antioch there were certain prophets and teachers…"
That would be the apostles and their successors which one can see from early church writings had direct ties to them.So - there have been various mention of the ‘church’ in several different geographical areas. And later in the book there are Paul’s missionary jorneys where many other ‘churches’ are formed. So - - What are these ‘churches’ and under Who’s authority are they being ‘formed’. And who is the Head of these bodies of believers / the churches that are formed of believers.
Yet you cited his article as indicative of your own beliefs did you not? Or do you not agree with what he says? You won’t find us citing sources that we do not agree with…except as I sometimes do in order to examine and refute their errors…Another comment – Trying to clear up a Big misunderstanding - Again. As for Mike Gendron – I found One article from him – No Clue as to who he is – I’m NOT a ‘follower’ of him. I’d found the same article from other research. There was really No need to start a side thread regarding him – Don’t know him – don’t Plan to. Okay? Thank you![]()
In what sense is Peter distinct for having the keys? What can he do that the other apostles can’t?It means that Peter is in authority in a special way distinct from the other Apostles. Also look to the prayer that Jesus prays for Peter that he will strengthen his brethren. And Jesus also commands him individually to feed, tend, and feed His sheep.
The bishops collectively have the authority known as the Magisterium. The Pope is a bishop as well, but has authority distinct from this as well.
The keys give him supremacy over the Church, just like the keys gave the Steward supremacy over the Kingdom in Isaiah 22.In what sense is Peter distinct for having the keys? What can he do that the other apostles can’t?
Right. It’s like each individual Catholic Church (i.e., St. Martha’s parish, St. Barnabas parish, etc.) are different churches in the physical sense, but all belong to the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. The only one built by Jesus.The Churches (plural) being established were all Catholic. They were not multiple denominations, if that’s what you’re getting at.