SPLIT: The Eucharist in Scripture and Catholic teaching.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Linda_Marie
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Many possibilities:
-he actually was baptized and included in the term “households”
-his desire for baptism was sufficient
-his suffering on the cross was a baptism of desire
-we are bound by baptism, but Jesus is not and can draw anyone to him by any means he wishes
I’ll go along with that, PR.

P.S. Does “PR” stand for “Public Relations”? 🙂
 
That’s good, but if you say such and such is essential, and someone says “I have not done that,” aren’t you saying that person is going to hell unless they do such and such?
I cannot and will not ever say that someone is “going to hell”.

If someone ever asks me, “I am a Christian and I did , am I going to hell?” I say, with the words of Christ, “Strive to enter.”
I’m ignorant. :doh2:
Purgatory: think about your soul at this very moment–is it pure and clean?
Now think about the verse in Revelation which says, “Nothing unclean can enter heaven.”

How do you, a Christian who embraces Christ but are not quite cleaned up, face the Eternal Godhead before the Throne of Heaven?

Through the atoning blood of Christ, to be sure, but how do you get cleaned up?

Answer: purgatory!
 
I’m talking about what I call the first stage of salvation, when we enter the kingdom of God on this earth, when we are born-again, when we are first justified or forgiven, when we become a child of God, when we are first covered by the blood of Jesus, when we start our journey of following the Lord.
Ah, so you’re talking about when someone gets baptized. :yup:
 
We all have the same goal - to spend eternity with God in heaven. Discussing this with you has been a pleasure. It has not been an adversarial confrontation but a genuine desire to understand. . . .
Thank you for that testimony, Linda. Much of this time in discussion has been a pleasure for me as well.
I’d like to tell you my testimony and how God led me into interdenominationalism. But it’s getting late. Maybe later. . . .

God bless you all. I feel a kinship with you.

We serve the best—and only—God in the universe!
 
Not really. Is that because of the doctrine of pergatory?
No; it’s because of the commandment that we are not to pass judgement on our brothers and sisters.

To identify a particular individual as “going to Hell” is to pass a final judgement on their soul that only God is allowed to pass - and that God has not yet passed, since obviously they are not yet in Hell.

We will know soon enough who is going to go to Hell and who isn’t, when we get there. 😉

There is no need to rush the process.

Those who go to Purgatory are already on their way to Heaven - there are no “second chances” in Purgatory for those who are in the state of mortal sin. If a person dies in the state of mortal sin, he goes straight to Hell; there is no stop-over in Purgatory.
 
That’s good, but if you say such and such is essential, and someone says “I have not done that,” aren’t you saying that person is going to hell unless they do such and such?
Not that they are definitely going to hell, but that they are at risk of going to hell.

As a charismatic Catholic, and having fooled around with the occult before coming to faith, I have had some experience with the denizens of hell. Just that small peek was more than enough to convince me I did not want to make a closer acquaintance.

Jesus said that if we don’t eat His Body and drink His Blood, we will have no life within us. He also said, “Take this, ALL of you and eat it. This is My Body which will be given up for you”. In the same way He took the cup, (the fourth cup of the Sedar meal). He gave the cup to his disciples and said, “Take this ALL of you and drink from it. This is the cup of My Blood, the Blood of the New and Everlasting Covenant.” This makes receiving the Eucharist essential. We must partake of the sacrifice to be part of the New Covenant.

EUCHARIST AND PASSOVER


PESACH

Jesus and the Passover Seder
As a liturgical memorial of the exodus, the Seder was central to Jesus’ religious life and his religious identity. In celebrating the Seder, Jesus affirmed and embraced the exodus as foundational and formative for the Jewish people; he expressed his fidelity to God’s command (Exodus 12.1-20) to celebrate one of the most important festivals; he recommitted himself to membership in the Jewish people - for not to celebrate the Seder was to cut oneself off from the people. In celebrating Passover, Jesus renewed - communally - the covenant between God and Israel that was established in the course of the exodus.

From Jewish Passover to Christian Eucharist: The Story of the Todah
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRmerger View Post
Do you understand what the Church teaches about purgatory?
Perhaps we need another thread to discuss purgatory. At first, I had a bit of trouble with it. I had some idea that it was a third possible destination after death, but this is not the case. Purgatory is part of heaven.

I have come to view it as the ablution block of heaven, so to speak, where we are cleansed of every last remnant of sin and attachment to sin and put on our pure clothing before entering heaven, just like a bride bathes herself and puts on a white dress in preparation for marriage. No bride presents herself with dirty hair, smelly body or in a tattered filthy dress for marriage. Venial sin does this to our souls. If we die with unforgiven venial sins on our souls, we must be cleansed before we can enter the Presence of God. God and sin, even venial sin, cannot coexist.
 
I had said, “When Pope John Paul II was in Cameroon one time, he asked twenty-six leaders of several denominations, ‘Indeed, is it not the duty of every follower of Christ to work for the unity of all Christians?’”

Wisdomseeker responded, “Why then do you reject the calling of the Church found by Christ and submit yourselves to One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church? just like we Catholics do?”

I guess we’re interpreting the Pope differently. I had taken the Pope’s statement as an indication that he recognized the leaders of the non-Catholic denominations as Christians. If he didn’t think they were Christians, he would have suggested that they convert, not unify with Catholics. Right? Darkness and light can’t unify.

I’m confused. :whacky: I need a second & third opinion on this. PR? jm?
Oh my. The pope calls for unity. where is the unity? there is only one place which unity can happen. It is in the CC. He is telling them to work towards unity in the CC.

But i am not surprised that you cannot grasp this one either. It is the desire of the Holy Church of God that should enter in her.

The Church also says that those who knows the Church and rejects her is in danger of losing their souls.
 
I watched the last part of a powerful movie on Joan of Ark last night and saw a part that fits into our discussion.
An older Catholic woman is dying. Just before her last breath she tells Joan, whom she knows is headed toward inquisition and possible burning at the stake, to remember these words: “So long as our Lord is first served.”

Later, when Joan is under interrogation, one of the Catholic priests—I presume he was a priest—asks Joan, “Will you submit to the judgment of the church as the voice of God on earth?”
She responds, “Yes.”
A few moments of silence follow.
Then, as the priest is turning away, and as if she remembers the older woman’s advice, she adds, “so long as our Lord is first served.”

Joan was eventually judged a heretic and burned to death, although witnesses say her heart didn’t burn.
500 years later the Church made her a Saint.

I agree with Joan—the Church moves in God’s authority only as long as our Lord is first served.
Maybe I’m the real Catholic here. 😉
 
I agree with Joan—the Church moves in God’s authority only as long as our Lord is first served.
Maybe I’m the real Catholic here. 😉
As soon as you join the Catholic Church, you will be, Cal! 🙂 And then you will enjoy the most sublime and intimate union that exists this side of heaven: the One Flesh Union between us and The Beloved called the Eucharist.

Regarding the Church moving in God’s authority only as long as our Lord is first served: don’t judge the Church by its sinful members who do not follow her teachings.

It’s the difference between orthopraxy (right practice) and orthodoxy (right teaching). One is prone to sin and error (orthopraxy) and one is not (orthodoxy). IOW: people can *practice *the faith incorrectly, but that does not make the teaching incorrect.
 
The invincibly ignorant can be saved, but that does not mean that they will be saved, Miguel.

Not to mention that having “an explicit faith” is not a Biblical term.

Jesus is the Eternal Logos, “the true light, which enlightens everyone” (John 1:9) and thus even those who have an “implicit faith” or knowledge of Him may be saved. Which is why Socrates, who never knew the man Incarnate, can be saved.
Hello, PR.

Please elaborate.
What’s the difference between explicit faith and implicit faith? In my understanding, you either have a saving faith that shows up outwardly, or you don’t have any saving faith at all.
 
No one is saved until he dies, Miguel.
Huh?
The Bible speaks of 3 stages of salvation.
We are saved from spiritual death and enter spiritual life when we repent, believing (living by faith) in Jesus Christ (according to 1 John).

We are saved from condemnation and declared forgiven (pardoned, justified, made ready to enter God’s presence during this life) immediately after we decide to live by faith in Jesus.

The second stage is the gradual process of purification—becoming more and more like Christ by the power of his indwelling Spirit—which we received at the first stage. First John says those who have a hope (anticipation) of heaven purify themselves daily.

The last stage is when we receive our glorified, immortal bodies and enter heaven.

(For the sake of simplifying the discussion, I’ll skip mention of the time in between our physical death and resurrection.)

Does our difference have only to do with semantics or is there a real difference?

Have a great day, my friend.
 
I had asked WisdomSeeker, “How does the Catholic Church interpret, ‘My sheep listen to my voice’ (John 10:27)?”

He responded, “How can you prove that HS [Holy Spirit] is guiding you and not the Church Jesus found?”

I’ll answer your question as soon as you answer mine.

Happy Christmas shopping to you, WisdomSeeker!
 
Hello, PR.

Please elaborate.
What’s the difference between explicit faith and implicit faith? In my understanding, you either have a saving faith that shows up outwardly, or you don’t have any saving faith at all.
An explicit faith is the Christian faith. An implicit faith is somehow apprehending Him who is the “true light which enlightens everyone”. So Socrates, who never met the man Jesus or knew of him, may be in heaven because he knows the Eternal Logos, the Word who exists in Eternity.
 
Huh?
The Bible speaks of 3 stages of salvation.
We are saved from spiritual death and enter spiritual life when we repent, believing (living by faith) in Jesus Christ (according to 1 John).

We are saved from condemnation and declared forgiven (pardoned, justified, made ready to enter God’s presence during this life) immediately after we decide to live by faith in Jesus.

The second stage is the gradual process of purification—becoming more and more like Christ by the power of his indwelling Spirit—which we received at the first stage. First John says those who have a hope (anticipation) of heaven purify themselves daily.

The last stage is when we receive our glorified, immortal bodies and enter heaven.

(For the sake of simplifying the discussion, I’ll skip mention of the time in between our physical death and resurrection.)

Does our difference have only to do with semantics or is there a real difference?

Have a great day, my friend.
It’s just a question of semantics. In the end, we are only saved when we die. Either God says to us, “Welcome, good and faithful servant!” or “Depart from me!”

However, salvation is also a continuum. We were saved, we are being saved, and we hope to be saved.

I am already saved: (Rom. 8:24, Eph. 2:5-8)
I’m also being saved (1 Cor. 1:8, 2 Cor. 2:15, Phil. 2:12)
and I have the hope that I will be saved (Rom. 5:9-10, 1 Cor. 3:12-15).
Have a great day, my friend.
Right back at 'cha! :flowers:
 
In the same way that the Jews re-presented and made present the original Passover sacrifice, we also make present and are united in the sacrifice of the lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world.
Nice to meet you, brother Church Militant! 🙂

I also recognize a connection between Communion and Passover. Jesus is the Lamb of God, as you yourself probably said.
We’d all be out in the cold—actually, I should say “in the hot”—without the Lamb “who takes away the sins of the world,” as John the Baptist put it.
 
When God sends a new revelation (as He has done twice in history, now) He accompanies it with public signs and miracles.
This is a good answer, and close to what I was looking for.
Signs, wonders, and miracles (that set people free from bondages of sin, disease, and yes, even physical death) are taking place in many Protestant circles today as well as in Catholic circles.
I agree with you that these are demonstrations-proofs that the true church of Christ is here!
Good going, jm! 👍

Much of what you said about the Mormon Church is inaccurate, but I won’t go there.
 
Jesus appointed shepherds over His One Flock. Those who are in unity with Him obey the shepherds He has appointed. He speaks through His Aposltes, and their successors. We can hear His voice in the infallible Teaching of the Church.
Jesus is the Chief Shepherd.
 
Jesus is the Chief Shepherd.
This is quite Catholic of you to say, Cal! 👍

Jesus is the Chief Shepherd, and He has a visible shepherd, or chief steward, here on earth.

From our Catechism:

You are the eternal Shepherd
who never leaves his flock untended.
Through the apostles
you watch over us and protect us always.
You made them shepherds of the flock
to share in the work of your Son. . .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top