Stable gay relationship is better than a 'temporary' one, says Cardinal Schönborn [CH-UK]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catholic_Herald
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
My personal experience and that of LGBT Catholics says otherwise.
So your same sex partnered friends told you they converted from sexual to non-sexual or chaste relations? How many same sex couples do you personally know and of that, how many do you believe made such conversion?

,
 
If there are great numbers of persons living in sinful relationships who simply do not see them as sinful, that itself is a problem and one which will continue to grow more serious. Simply recognizing the good aspects of an inherently disordered relationship will probably not lead to further conversion but rather affirm them in a disordered lifestyle.
There are a great number of sinful people - period. I am one. I doubt that you are not one. I think that what is sinful is well established and will not change. How the sinner is treated can change and maybe should change. I honestly don’t know, but I would like to think that the Catholic Church could improve - could be more meaningful to more people. And I’m pretty sure that God does not want us condemning each other.
 
There are a great number of sinful people - period. I am one. I doubt that you are not one. I think that what is sinful is well established and will not change. How the sinner is treated can change and maybe should change. I honestly don’t know, but I would like to think that the Catholic Church could improve - could be more meaningful to more people. And I’m pretty sure that God does not want us condemning each other.
I’m sure He wants us to condemn evil when we see it. I don’t hear the Church saying that we should focus on the good of detraction or masturbation or lying even though many people sin in this way. More people sin in this way, I would say, than the 3% of people that have homosexual desires or the people living in adulterous “marriages”. But if the Church says there is good in all sins, then what is so bad about sins if there is so much good in it? This is how people will perceive it; they already are perceiving it this way.
 
No, not at all, a new norm. Morality does not evolve. Are we supposed to rewrite the Bible or take out the parts that don’t conform to political correctness? I am afraid not.
We rewrite the Bible all the time. Or perhaps I should rephrase that and say that we gloss over the parts that we have decided culturally, politically, or even morally do not apply any more.

Some examples are about the role of women especially. I haven’t really gone into the Hebrew Bible texts - some of which we as Christians keep and some we use the excuse that the Law is no longer valid. But know that we very much pick and choose our texts to follow.

Here are Scriptural verses that we have decided no longer apply:

Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church. I Cor 14:36

Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. ! Timothy 2:11

Slaves are to be submissive to their own masters in everything; they are to be well-pleasing, not argumentative, not pilfering, but showing all good faith, so that in everything they may adorn the doctrine of God our Savior. Titus 2:9

“No one of illegitimate birth shall enter the assembly of the Lord; none of his descendants, even to the tenth generation, shall enter the assembly of the Lord.” Deut 23:2

Likewise, I want women to adorn themselves with proper clothing, modestly and discreetly, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly garments. I Tim 2:9

Six days shall work be done, but the seventh day is a Sabbath of solemn rest, holy to the Lord. Whoever does any work on the Sabbath day shall be put to death. Exodus 31:15
 
I’m sure He wants us to condemn evil when we see it. I don’t hear the Church saying that we should focus on the good of detraction or masturbation or lying even though many people sin in this way. More people sin in this way, I would say, than the 3% of people that have homosexual desires or the people living in adulterous “marriages”. But if the Church says there is good in all sins, then what is so bad about sins if there is so much good in it? This is how people will perceive it; they already are perceiving it this way.
My mother converted to Catholicism when she married my father. I have a whole wing of my family, primarily in Texas, that are Baptists. They like to say, “Hate the sin; love the sinner.”
 
We rewrite the Bible all the time. Or perhaps I should rephrase that and say that we gloss over the parts that we have decided culturally, politically, or even morally do not apply any more.

Some examples are about the role of women especially. I haven’t really gone into the Hebrew Bible texts - some of which we as Christians keep and some we use the excuse that the Law is no longer valid. But know that we very much pick and choose our texts to follow.

Here are Scriptural verses that we have decided no longer apply:

Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church. I Cor 14:36

Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. ! Timothy 2:11

Slaves are to be submissive to their own masters in everything; they are to be well-pleasing, not argumentative, not pilfering, but showing all good faith, so that in everything they may adorn the doctrine of God our Savior. Titus 2:9

“No one of illegitimate birth shall enter the assembly of the Lord; none of his descendants, even to the tenth generation, shall enter the assembly of the Lord.” Deut 23:2

Likewise, I want women to adorn themselves with proper clothing, modestly and discreetly, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly garments. I Tim 2:9

Six days shall work be done, but the seventh day is a Sabbath of solemn rest, holy to the Lord. Whoever does any work on the Sabbath day shall be put to death. Exodus 31:15
First of all, who is “we”? You or Synods of Church fathers? You also forgot to bring in the shellfish prohibition. One thing those like you ignore is a hierarchy of values. God made them male and female goes through the WHOLE of the Bible with who begat whom. This is the basis of history, but also tracing the lineage of David.

Same sex arrangements go against not only the letter of the Law but its Spirit. They are sterile so cannot go out and multiply. What a woman wears, yes, does change over time. The same with blood sacrifice that is not needed anymore in the New Testament, and in fact, the Jews stopped after the 2nd Temple was destroyed. Murder, stealing, blasphemy, sexual immorality, etc., all the important stuff hasn’t changed.
 
First of all, who is “we”? You or Synods of Church fathers? You also forgot to bring in the shellfish prohibition. One thing those like you ignore is a hierarchy of values. God made them male and female goes through the WHOLE of the Bible with who begat whom. This is the basis of history, but also tracing the lineage of David.

Same sex arrangements go against not only the letter of the Law but its Spirit. They are sterile so cannot go out and multiply. What a woman wears, yes, does change over time. The same with blood sacrifice that is not needed anymore in the New Testament, and in fact, the Jews stopped after the 2nd Temple was destroyed. Murder, stealing, blasphemy, sexual immorality, etc., all the important stuff hasn’t changed.
The ‘we’ of Biblical interpretation continues throughout history. There has never been a static exegesis. We interpret and re-imagine how Scripture is understood and prayed and applied in our lives to this day. That’s why we are a living community of faith.

I didn’t forget shellfish or pork nor did I forget the ban on using leather. There are many things in the Torah that Orthodox Jews still observe and other Jews and Christians do not. I mentioned that already.

You speak of values and that being unchangeable. I disagree. Values change all the time. And we can disagree about how they are changing and how the new values may not be as wise as the old values but they still change. Women no longer belong to their husbands as a purchased commodity. Slavery is no longer morally ethical. And sexual morality has also changed. And all these things will continue to change as our culture changes.
 
…sexual morality has also changed. And all these things will continue to change as our culture changes.
Says you, but not the Bible and Christian morality as much as some people want to water it down. Culture doesn’t make the rules, in particular, perverse politically correct culture. Children do not have two daddies or two mommies. You can dilute the definition of marriage until it is meaningless but that is not going to change the way children are brought into the world, barring the Frankenstinian manipulations of nature.
 
Says you, but not the Bible and Christian morality as much as some people want to water it down. Culture doesn’t make the rules, in particular, perverse politically correct culture. Children do not have two daddies or two mommies. You can dilute the definition of marriage until it is meaningless but that is not going to change the way children are brought into the world, barring the Frankenstinian manipulations of nature.
I understand what you are saying, and we respectfully disagree. Families come in all forms these days - as they have for millennia - but even more so now. We must recognize that and honor each situation for what it is. Some families have one parent, or a grandparent, or a foster parent. Some families have two mothers or two fathers. The thing that we must value above all else is stability and love and how children are taken care of and nurtured. And that is done when there is love between partners first. I believe that is what the Cardinal was exemplifying.
 
I understand what you are saying, and we respectfully disagree. Families come in all forms these days - as they have for millennia - but even more so now. We must recognize that and honor each situation for what it is. Some families have one parent, or a grandparent, or a foster parent. Some families have two mothers or two fathers. The thing that we must value above all else is stability and love and how children are taken care of and nurtured. And that is done when there is love between partners first. I believe that is what the Cardinal was exemplifying.
The Cardinal is misrepresenting Church teaching. This is not the first time some clergy think they are better. In all cases, the teaching trumps the person. There may be some people play acting family with same sex parents but they do not fit the time honored definition of marriage that they are dragging into the mud.
It may be that a relative has to pinch hit for the loss or one or two parents but this does not negate the fact that children even when adopted are vitally interested in knowing their biological parents. If their dad comes from a pool of DNA samples and a mother is just a paid baby incubator, then this situation is appalling.
From the get go, same sex families already deprive a child of one or two parents. Children are not puppies just to be fed and cared for. They have deep psychological needs for the proper imprinting and modeling that only a stable man and a woman can give them. This doesn’t even begin to deal with the disordered sexuality that usually comes from trauma, abuse and/or neglect. Problems become compounded with new generations, not solved. go ahead and read about the anguish that adult children of same sex couples have finally come out of the closet to admit. One woman recounted the promiscuity of her father and his multiple partners who also tried to molest her. The fact that pederasty is very high among homosexuals is a big reason not to let them adopt boys. There are plenty reports of abuse by such couples already. Please, don’t try to whitewash the monumental dysfunction unleashed by changing cultural norms to fit the selfishness of a few.
 
We rewrite the Bible all the time. Or perhaps I should rephrase that and say that we gloss over the parts that we have decided culturally, politically, or even morally do not apply any more.

Some examples are about the role of women especially. I haven’t really gone into the Hebrew Bible texts - some of which we as Christians keep and some we use the excuse that the Law is no longer valid. But know that we very much pick and choose our texts to follow.

Here are Scriptural verses that we have decided no longer apply:

Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church. I Cor 14:36

Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. ! Timothy 2:11

Slaves are to be submissive to their own masters in everything; they are to be well-pleasing, not argumentative, not pilfering, but showing all good faith, so that in everything they may adorn the doctrine of God our Savior. Titus 2:9

“No one of illegitimate birth shall enter the assembly of the Lord; none of his descendants, even to the tenth generation, shall enter the assembly of the Lord.” Deut 23:2

Likewise, I want women to adorn themselves with proper clothing, modestly and discreetly, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly garments. I Tim 2:9

Six days shall work be done, but the seventh day is a Sabbath of solemn rest, holy to the Lord. Whoever does any work on the Sabbath day shall be put to death. Exodus 31:15
Exactly
 
I understand what you are saying, and we respectfully disagree. Families come in all forms these days - as they have for millennia - but even more so now. We must recognize that and honor each situation for what it is. Some families have one parent, or a grandparent, or a foster parent. Some families have two mothers or two fathers. The thing that we must value above all else is stability and love and how children are taken care of and nurtured. And that is done when there is love between partners first. I believe that is what the Cardinal was exemplifying.
It may be that a relative has to pinch hit for the loss or one or two parents but this does not negate the fact that children even when adopted are vitally interested in knowing their biological parents. If their dad comes from a pool of DNA samples and a mother is just a paid baby incubator, then this situation is appalling.
From the get go, same sex families already deprive a child of one or two parents. Children are not puppies just to be fed and cared for. They have deep psychological needs for the proper imprinting and modeling that only a stable man and a woman can give them. This doesn’t even begin to deal with the disordered sexuality that usually comes from trauma, abuse and/or neglect. Problems become compounded with new generations, not solved. go ahead and read about the anguish that adult children of same sex couples have finally come out of the closet to admit. One woman recounted the promiscuity of her father and his multiple partners who also tried to molest her. The fact that pederasty is very high among homosexuals is a big reason not to let them adopt boys. There are plenty reports of abuse by such couples already. Please, don’t try to whitewash the monumental dysfunction unleashed by changing cultural norms to fit the selfishness of a few.
 
The ‘we’ of Biblical interpretation continues throughout history. There has never been a static exegesis. We interpret and re-imagine how Scripture is understood and prayed and applied in our lives to this day. That’s why we are a living community of faith.

I didn’t forget shellfish or pork nor did I forget the ban on using leather. There are many things in the Torah that Orthodox Jews still observe and other Jews and Christians do not. I mentioned that already.

You speak of values and that being unchangeable. I disagree. Values change all the time. And we can disagree about how they are changing and how the new values may not be as wise as the old values but they still change. Women no longer belong to their husbands as a purchased commodity. Slavery is no longer morally ethical. And sexual morality has also changed. And all these things will continue to change as our culture changes.
I agree. But then I’m not comfortable with human beings not being open to changes in how Scripture and God are understood. And I agree about the many Scripture passages not followed by Christians today. And in regard to families, I agree as well. I had 1 parent for most all of my life and honestly never missed not having 2 of opposite genders. Maybe that is testimony to the great job my one parent did. But I never really gave not having one father and one mother even a thought.
 
My mother converted to Catholicism when she married my father. I have a whole wing of my family, primarily in Texas, that are Baptists. They like to say, “Hate the sin; love the sinner.”
If you love the sinner, you won’t let them stay in sin.
 
If you love the sinner, you won’t let them stay in sin.
Honestly, more than my neighbors’ failings, I am concerned with my own lack of virtue - specifically my own lack of charity towards others and the difficulty that I have being truly humble.
 
MODERATOR NOTE

Just a general note not aimed at anyone in particular

When discussing issues of theology avoid attacking individual clerics or groups of clerics or theologians. Personal attacks such as “he is a heretic” or “he is teaching what the world wants to hear, not what Christ taught” are uncharitable attacks and against forum rules.

Instead charitably present your argument, why you feel the teaching is incorrect and how you would teach differently.

All discussions here are to be charitable at all times. Even controversial ones.

Finally, double check your post for charity before clicking submit.
 
Honestly, more than my neighbors’ failings, I am concerned with my own lack of virtue - specifically my own lack of charity towards others and the difficulty that I have being truly humble.
Then ask God for more strength in those areas. It helps.

We can’t let our own failings prevent us from helping as appropriate.

Ed 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top