Steubenville axes Catholic chapel from logo

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zosimus41
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted by grannymh forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_khaki/viewpost.gif
The foundation goal is to destroy Catholicism. A major step, in their eyes, is to destroy religious liberty for all.
You give them too little credit. Why stop at Catholicism? The goal is to end all forms of religion and make us a nation of atheists.
I can understand what you are implying. However, the foundation goal remains to destroy Catholicism because it is the one main obstacle to a variety of secular agendas. One does not really have to end all forms of religion. All that has to be done is to get religious people to cave regarding basic truths. The movement to change Catholic doctrines so that they comport with secular views is a good example.

But I digress. Essentially you are correct. The goal is to end all forms of religion and make us a nation of atheists.
 
Cross on city card scares atheists
Catholic League president Bill Donohue comments on efforts by atheists from Wisconsin to intimidate officials from Steubenville, Ohio into banning a proposed new city logo that includes a chapel and a cross; the symbols represent the Franciscan University of Steubenville:
Nothing scares atheists more than religion, and no religion scares them more than Catholicism. That is why atheists from the Freedom From Religion Foundation are threatening to sue Steubenville over a proposed new city logo: the design shows the cross and a silhouette of the campus chapel, along with such landmarks as Fort Steuben and the Veterans’ Memorial Bridge.
As is commonplace, city logos reflect the people and institutions associated with the municipality, and in the case of Steubenville, this means including symbols that represent the Franciscan University of Steubenville. Because of its national reputation as a first-class Catholic university, any depiction of the school that does not reflect its Catholic identity would be dishonest. Indeed, it would be like nixing the “Fighting Irish” leprechaun-figure from a logo representing the University of Notre Dame.
Initially, city officials were wary of the costs involved (if the city loses it has to pick up court-ordered legal fees), so they opted for a new logo: the university would be featured without a depiction of the cross and chapel. But after a groundswell of support for the initial logo, experienced pro-bono lawyers have stepped forth. Everything is now on hold.
It is entirely constitutional to have religious symbols outside City Hall at Christmastime, provided they are accompanied by secular symbols. It should also be constitutional to have religious symbols accompany secular ones on a city logo, especially when the former clearly represent an institution that is integrally associated with the municipality.
Tell Mayor Domenick Mucci, Jr., who is on our side, not to buckle to the forces of censorship: mayor@cityofsteubenville.us
catholicleague.org/cross-on-city-logo-scares-atheists
 
🤦

How long before these fruit loops start trying to sue individual Christians for being Christians?
Or when will they start demanding every city, town and community in the US that has a religious name change it? From Providence, Rhode Island and St. Paul, Minn. to the hundred or so cities in California that start with the words “San” or “Santa.” Even Los Angeles will have to change it’s name!! I look forward to that day…that will be quite a fight!! And a futile one (for the atheists) at that!!;):D:)

-Chris
 
Or when will they start demanding every city, town and community in the US that has a religious name change it? From Providence, Rhode Island and St. Paul, Minn. to the hundred or so cities in California that start with the words “San” or “Santa.” Even Los Angeles will have to change it’s name!! I look forward to that day…that will be quite a fight!! And a futile one (for the atheists) at that!!;):D:)

-Chris
Pardon me.

It will only be a fight if today, each one of us commits ourselves to defending American religious liberty today. Today is imporrtant. If we lose today in today’s battle for American religious freedom, then the battle over “city names” will have already been won by the opposition. Today is the day to mail a letter to our representatives, local, state, and national.
 
If the Catholic identity of the school is offensives.
Why not change the school name to something moreCatholic
Why give free publicity to a town that rejects them.
How much benifit have names like Boston College Dayton Faifield and dozens more given these cities.
 
If the Catholic identity of the school is offensives.
Why not change the school name to something moreCatholic
Why give free publicity to a town that rejects them.
How much benifit have names like Boston College Dayton Faifield and dozens more given these cities.
 
If the Catholic identity of the school is offensives.
Why not change the school name to something moreCatholic
Franciscan University of Steubenville seems pretty Catholic already.
 
And not “one nation under Obama” nor “one nation under Dawkins”. 😉
Before 1955 it was just “One Nation” I guess by then there were too many people who couldn’t figure out that this nation was “under God” so they had to add it as a reminder!🤷
 
Before 1955 it was just “One Nation” I guess by then there were too many people who couldn’t figure out that this nation was “under God” so they had to add it as a reminder!🤷
Seems to me that it is time to remind our elected government that we are still a nation under God which means that religious liberty is meant for all people. By the way, is our election process still free? If so, why are so many people afraid to tell their elected represenatives the truth about religious freedom? Does Steubenville still have freedom?
 
Drop the steubenville
Perhaps if the image is dropped from the logo, that would be an appropriate change. Why associate the institution with a town from which it has been disassociated?
 
News Update

The City of Steubenville is now considering its options, according to an article in the local newspaper (dated August 3rd)
City Manager Cathy Davison said Thursday the city administration has received several offers of pro-bono legal representation and will continue to discuss the issue with City Council.
“The city’s mayor, City Council and administration are reviewing all options that pertain to the city logo and the effect it may have on our residents, businesses and visitors,” noted Davison.
An FFRF attorney sent a letter to Law Director S. Gary Repella on Wednesday warning against accepting legal help to oppose the Freedom from Religion Foundation.
A standing-room-only crowd attended Tuesday night’s City Council meeting with several speakers urging council to officially adopt the city logo and to oppose efforts to change the logo.
heraldstaronline.com/page/content.detail/id/576479/City-logo-debate-continues.html?nav=5010
 
Proud of my alma mater for their response. 👍
My oldest niece graduated from FU; her little sister is a senior. God bless this wonderful University! Check this out from the FFRF website:

“The Freedom From Religion Foundation has been found eligible for inclusion on the National Part of the 2010 Combined Federal Campaign (CFC) Charity List. FFRF has been a CFC charity since 2007. Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. will appear in the listing of “National/International Independent Organizations” which is published in each local campaign charity list. The CFC code donors should use to designate their contribution to FFRF is 32519. The Foundation received over $40,000 from CFC donors in 2009.”

This group is a charity? So charitable of them to attack Steubenville for showing pride in an important landmark. The local citizen, representing a miniscule minority segment of the Steubenville population, successfully demonstrated how the politically correct can tyrannize the majority by feigned insult.
 
My oldest niece graduated from FU; her little sister is a senior. God bless this wonderful University! Check this out from the FFRF website:

“The Freedom From Religion Foundation has been found eligible for inclusion on the National Part of the 2010 Combined Federal Campaign (CFC) Charity List. FFRF has been a CFC charity since 2007. Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. will appear in the listing of “National/International Independent Organizations” which is published in each local campaign charity list. The CFC code donors should use to designate their contribution to FFRF is 32519. The Foundation received over $40,000 from CFC donors in 2009.”

This group is a charity? So charitable of them to attack Steubenville for showing pride in an important landmark. The local citizen, representing a miniscule minority segment of the Steubenville population, successfully demonstrated how the politically correct can tyrannize the majority by feigned insult.
There always seems to be someone who can spoil things for everyone else!😦
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top